World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 96 9687 9091 338 323 687 32929

Angelo Vacca publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Angelo Vacca between 1964 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Angelo Vacca published across 62 years, from 1964 to 2025, averaging 14 papers a year. Output peaked at 88 publications in 2023. 41 of the 868 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60 80
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1964 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 88. Peak 88 publications in 2023. 1964: 1 publication 1965: 1 publication 1966: 3 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 1 publication 1969: 0 publications 1970: 2 publications 1971: 6 publications 1972: 9 publications 1973: 1 publication 1974: 2 publications 1975: 3 publications 1976: 1 publication 1977: 1 publication 1978: 2 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 2 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 4 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 4 publications 1989: 5 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 7 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 10 publications 1996: 12 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 13 publications 1999: 19 publications 2000: 15 publications 2001: 28 publications 2002: 28 publications 2003: 22 publications 2004: 27 publications 2005: 19 publications 2006: 25 publications 2007: 27 publications 2008: 27 publications 2009: 27 publications 2010: 20 publications 2011: 26 publications 2012: 24 publications 2013: 23 publications 2014: 33 publications 2015: 30 publications 2016: 34 publications 2017: 22 publications 2018: 31 publications 2019: 28 publications 2020: 29 publications 2021: 35 publications 2022: 21 publications 2023: 88 publications 2024: 18 publications 2025: 23 publications
1964 2025

868 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Angelo Vacca: publications per year, 1964 to 2025
Year Publications
1964 1
1965 1
1966 3
1967 0
1968 1
1969 0
1970 2
1971 6
1972 9
1973 1
1974 2
1975 3
1976 1
1977 1
1978 2
1979 0
1980 2
1981 0
1982 0
1983 4
1984 2
1985 3
1986 3
1987 1
1988 4
1989 5
1990 2
1991 4
1992 7
1993 4
1994 3
1995 10
1996 12
1997 7
1998 13
1999 19
2000 15
2001 28
2002 28
2003 22
2004 27
2005 19
2006 25
2007 27
2008 27
2009 27
2010 20
2011 26
2012 24
2013 23
2014 33
2015 30
2016 34
2017 22
2018 31
2019 28
2020 29
2021 35
2022 21
2023 88
2024 18
2025 23
Total 868
Download as CSV

Angelo Vacca publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Angelo Vacca sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 681–700 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 687 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336 687
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Angelo Vacca D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Angelo Vacca sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 96–97 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 96 D-Index — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779 96
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Angelo Vacca is affiliated with the University of Bari Aldo Moro in Italy and works primarily in the field of Medicine. Their research encompasses multiple interconnected subfields, including Molecular Biology, Immunology, Hematology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, and Rheumatology.

The scientist's research topics are centered on several focused areas:

  • Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
  • Immunodeficiency and Autoimmune Disorders
  • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
  • COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Vasculitis and related conditions
  • Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
  • Eosinophilic Disorders and Syndromes

Key recent papers authored or co-authored by Angelo Vacca include:

  • Neutrophil Extracellular Traps (NETs) and Damage-Associated Molecular Patterns (DAMPs): Two Potential Targets for COVID-19 Treatment, 2020, published in Mediators of Inflammation
  • Mepolizumab for Eosinophilic Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis: A European Multicenter Observational Study, 2021, Arthritis & Rheumatology
  • Mechanisms of Resistance to Anti-CD38 Daratumumab in Multiple Myeloma, 2020, Cells
  • Early Disease and Low Baseline Damage as Predictors of Response to Belimumab in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in a Real-Life Setting, 2020, Arthritis & Rheumatology
  • COVID-19 and the Endocrine System: A Comprehensive Review on the Theme, 2021, Journal of Clinical Medicine

Frequent collaborators of this researcher include:

  • Antonio Giovanni Solimando
  • Sebastiano Cicco
  • Roberto Ria
  • Vito Racanelli
  • Vanessa Desantis

Angelo Vacca has published extensively in several journals, with frequent contributions to:

  • Journal of Clinical Medicine
  • Cancers
  • Clinical and Experimental Medicine
  • Journal of Hypertension
  • International Journal of Molecular Sciences

Best Publications

  • Bone marrow angiogenesis and progression in multiple myeloma.

    Angelo Vacca;Domenico Ribatti;Luisa Roncali;Girolamo Ranieri

  • Bone marrow neovascularization, plasma cell angiogenic potential, and matrix metalloproteinase-2 secretion parallel progression of human multiple myeloma.

    Angelo Vacca;Domenico Ribatti;Marco Presta;Monica Minischetti

  • Human Erythropoietin Induces a Pro-Angiogenic Phenotype in Cultured Endothelial Cells and Stimulates Neovascularization In Vivo

    Domenico Ribatti;Marco Presta;Marco Presta;Angelo Vacca;Angelo Vacca;Roberto Ria;Roberto Ria

  • MHC Class I Antigen Processing and Presenting Machinery: Organization, Function, and Defects in Tumor Cells

    Patrizia Leone;Eui-Cheol Shin;Federico Perosa;Angelo Vacca

  • Chorioallantoic membrane capillary bed: a useful target for studying angiogenesis and anti-angiogenesis in vivo.

    Domenico Ribatti;Beatrice Nico;Angelo Vacca;Luisa Roncali

  • Bortezomib mediates antiangiogenesis in multiple myeloma via direct and indirect effects on endothelial cells.

    Aldo Maria Roccaro;Teru Hideshima;Noopur Raje;Shaji Kumar

  • TIMP‐2 over‐expression reduces invasion and angiogenesis and protects B16F10 melanoma cells from apoptosis

    Piera Valente;Gianfranco Fassina;Antonella Melchiori;Luciana Masiello

  • Expression of MAGE genes in primary and metastatic cutaneous melanoma.

    Francis Brasseur;Donata Rimoldi;Danielle Liénard;Danielle Liénard;Bernard Lethé

  • Antiangiogenesis Is Produced by Nontoxic Doses of Vinblastine

    Angelo Vacca;Monica Iurlaro;Domenico Ribatti;Monica Minischetti

  • The gelatin sponge-chorioallantoic membrane assay.

    Domenico Ribatti;Beatrice Nico;Angelo Vacca;Marco Presta

  • The history of the angiogenic switch concept.

    D Ribatti;B Nico;E Crivellato;A M Roccaro

  • Bone marrow angiogenesis and mast cell density increase simultaneously with progression of human multiple myeloma.

    D Ribatti;A Vacca;B Nico;F Quondamatteo

  • Tumor vascularity and tryptase-positive mast cells correlate with a poor prognosis in melanoma.

    D Ribatti;Maria Grazia Ennas;A Vacca;F Ferreli

  • Stephen Paget and the ‘seed and soil’ theory of metastatic dissemination

    D. Ribatti;G. Mangialardi;A. Vacca

  • The chick embryo chorioallantoic membrane as a model for in vivo research on angiogenesis.

    Domenico Ribatti;Angelo Vacca;Luisa Roncali;Franco Dammacco

  • Bcr-Abl stabilizes β-catenin in chronic myeloid leukemia through its tyrosine phosphorylation

    Addolorata Maria Luce Coluccia;Addolorata Maria Luce Coluccia;Angelo Vacca;Mireia Duñach;Luca Mologni

  • New Model for the Study of Angiogenesis and Antiangiogenesis in the Chick Embryo Chorioallantoic Membrane: The Gelatin Sponge/ Chorioallantoic Membrane Assay

    Domenico Ribatti;Anna Gualandris;Maria Bastaki;Angelo Vacca

  • Bone marrow angiogenesis in multiple myeloma.

    A Vacca;D Ribatti

  • Angiogenesis spectrum in the stroma of B‐cell non‐Hodgkin's lymphomas. An immunohistochemical and ultrastructural study

    D. Ribatti;A. Vacca;B. Nico;M. Fanelli

  • Macrophages in rheumatoid arthritis.

    N. Maruotti;F.P. Cantatore;Enrico Crivellato;A. Vacca

Frequent Co-Authors

Domenico Ribatti
Domenico Ribatti University of Bari Aldo Moro
Franco Dammacco
Franco Dammacco University of Bari Aldo Moro
Beatrice Nico
Beatrice Nico University of Bari Aldo Moro
Marco Presta
Marco Presta University of Brescia
Diego Guidolin
Diego Guidolin University of Padua
Pellegrino Musto
Pellegrino Musto University of Bari Aldo Moro
Michele Cavo
Michele Cavo University of Bologna
Mirco Ponzoni
Mirco Ponzoni Istituto Giannina Gaslini
Nicola Silvestris
Nicola Silvestris University of Messina
Hermann Einsele
Hermann Einsele University of Würzburg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're interested in Medicine but want to explore alternative or supplementary career options, there are several flexible pathways to consider. Many students who may not meet strict admission criteria for traditional programs start with the easiest nursing schools to get into, which can provide a solid healthcare foundation and valuable clinical experience.

For those wanting to enter healthcare quickly, lpn program without teas test is a practical route—these programs are accessible and reduce barriers to entry. Some pathways, like the fast-growing field of healthcare administration, can be pursued via a degree such as an health administration degree online, allowing students to train for leadership roles in clinics and hospitals.

Additionally, if you're interested in the administrative side of healthcare, financial aid for medical billing and coding online classes makes it easier to start a stable, in-demand career without the need for extensive medical training. Each of these options can offer a pathway into the healthcare sector that complements or provides an alternative to traditional medical education in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Angelo Vacca

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles