World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
38
Citations
5990
World Ranking
10250
National Ranking
4303

Jonathan Aldrich publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan Aldrich sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 200 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Jonathan Aldrich D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan Aldrich sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2009 - ACM Senior Member

Overview

Jonathan Aldrich is affiliated with Carnegie Mellon University in the United States. Their research spans mainly the field of Computer Science, with a strong focus on several subfields including Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Computer Networks and Communications, and Software.

Their work covers an array of topics centered on Security and Verification in Computing, Logic, programming, and type systems, Formal Methods in Verification, Software Engineering Research, Blockchain Technology Applications and Security, Distributed systems and fault tolerance, and Advanced Malware Detection Techniques.

Jonathan Aldrich's recent publications include:

  • "Penrose" (2020), published in ACM Transactions on Graphics
  • "PLIERS" (2021), published in ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
  • "Obsidian" (2020), published in ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems
  • "Gradual verification of recursive heap data structures" (2020), published in Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages
  • "Sound Gradual Verification with Symbolic Execution" (2024), published in Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages

The venues where Jonathan Aldrich frequently publishes include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages
  • Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (Schloss Dagstuhl)
  • ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Their common collaborators encompass:

  • Joshua Sunshine
  • Jenna Wise
  • Michael Coblenz
  • Éric Tanter
  • Ian McCormack

Jonathan Aldrich has been recognized as an ACM Senior Member since 2009.

Best Publications

  • ArchJava: connecting software architecture to implementation

    Jonathan Aldrich;Craig Chambers;David Notkin

  • Open modules: modular reasoning about advice

    Jonathan Aldrich

  • Alias annotations for program understanding

    Jonathan Aldrich;Valentin Kostadinov;Craig Chambers

  • Modular typestate checking of aliased objects

    Kevin Bierhoff;Jonathan Aldrich

  • Ownership Domains: Separating Aliasing Policy from Mechanism

    Jonathan Aldrich;Craig Chambers

  • Architectural reasoning in ArchJava

    Jonathan Aldrich;Craig Chambers;David Notkin

  • Static Analyses for Eliminating Unnecessary Synchronization from Java Programs

    Jonathan Aldrich;Craig Chambers;Emin Gün Sirer;Susan J. Eggers

  • Typestate-oriented programming

    Jonathan Aldrich;Joshua Sunshine;Darpan Saini;Zachary Sparks

  • DiscoTect: a system for discovering architectures from running systems

    Hong Yan;David Garlan;Bradley Schmerl;Jonathan Aldrich

  • Discovering Architectures from Running Systems

    B. Schmerl;J. Aldrich;D. Garlan;R. Kazman

  • Providing easier access to remote objects in client-server systems

    J. Aldrich;J. Dooley;S. Mandelsohn;A. Rifkin

  • Language Support for Connector Abstractions

    Jonathan Aldrich;Vibha Sazawal;Craig Chambers;David Notkin

  • First-class state change in plaid

    Joshua Sunshine;Karl Naden;Sven Stork;Jonathan Aldrich

  • Gradual typestate

    Roger Wolff;Ronald Garcia;Éric Tanter;Jonathan Aldrich

  • Statically checking API protocol conformance with mined multi-object specifications

    Michael Pradel;Ciera Jaspan;Jonathan Aldrich;Thomas R. Gross

  • Verifying correct usage of atomic blocks and typestate

    Nels E. Beckman;Kevin Bierhoff;Jonathan Aldrich

  • Practical API Protocol Checking with Access Permissions

    Kevin Bierhoff;Nels E. Beckman;Jonathan Aldrich

  • Static extraction and conformance analysis of hierarchical runtime architectural structure using annotations

    Marwan Abi-Antoun;Jonathan Aldrich

  • Foundations of Typestate-Oriented Programming

    Ronald Garcia;Éric Tanter;Roger Wolff;Jonathan Aldrich

  • A type system for borrowing permissions

    Karl Naden;Robert Bocchino;Jonathan Aldrich;Kevin Bierhoff

  • Statically checking API protocol conformance with mined multi-object specifications: companion report

    Michael Pradel;Cierra Jaspan;Jonathan Aldrich;Thomas K.R. Gross

Frequent Co-Authors

Brad A. Myers
Brad A. Myers Carnegie Mellon University
Éric Tanter
Éric Tanter University of Chile
Craig Chambers
Craig Chambers Google (United States)
David Garlan
David Garlan Carnegie Mellon University
Bradley Schmerl
Bradley Schmerl Carnegie Mellon University
David Notkin
David Notkin University of Washington
Rick Kazman
Rick Kazman University of Hawaii at Manoa
Claire Le Goues
Claire Le Goues Carnegie Mellon University
Lars Birkedal
Lars Birkedal Aarhus University
Emin Gün Sirer
Emin Gün Sirer Cornell University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As the demand for digital skills grows, more students are exploring flexible options to earn computer science and related degrees online. For those seeking value, cheap online colleges offer budget-friendly paths to quality education.

If you’re concerned about meeting admissions requirements, there are reputable online colleges that accept 2.0 gpa applicants, providing opportunities for more students to pursue their dreams.

Many online programs now offer accelerated formats. Through the fastest computer science degree options, motivated learners can graduate and enter the workforce more quickly.

Interested in related fields? There’s also great potential in environmental science—explore various jobs for environmental science majors that blend technology, research, and sustainability.

No matter your background or schedule, online degrees open new doors and diverse career pathways in computer science and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Jonathan Aldrich

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles