World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Éric Tanter

Éric Tanter

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
30
Citations
3714
World Ranking
14117
National Ranking
9

Éric Tanter publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Éric Tanter sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 225 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Éric Tanter D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Éric Tanter sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Éric Tanter is a researcher affiliated with the University of Chile in Chile, specializing in computer science with a focus on areas such as logic, programming, and type systems. Their scholarly work spans multiple subfields including artificial intelligence, computational theory and mathematics, information systems, computer networks and communications, and software.

Their research contributions cover a range of topics in computer science, notably:

  • Logic, programming, and type systems
  • Formal methods in verification
  • Security and verification in computing
  • Software engineering research
  • Logic, reasoning, and knowledge
  • Distributed systems and fault tolerance
  • Privacy-preserving technologies in data

Éric Tanter's frequent collaborators include:

  • Nicolas Tabareau (with 11 coauthored works)
  • Kenji Maillard (10)
  • Matías Toro (10)
  • Jonathan Aldrich (6)
  • Joshua Sunshine (6)

Their research has been published extensively in several academic venues such as:

  • Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages (10 publications)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (6)
  • ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems (4)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (4)
  • Journal of the ACM (2)

Recent publications reflect their focus on formal methods and programming languages, including:

  • Gradualizing the Calculus of Inductive Constructions, 2022, ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems
  • Abstracting gradual references, 2020, Science of Computer Programming
  • An Extended Account of Trace-relating Compiler Correctness and Secure Compilation, 2021, ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems
  • Gradual verification of recursive heap data structures, 2020, Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages
  • Contextual Linear Types for Differential Privacy, 2023, ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems

Best Publications

  • Scalable omniscient debugging

    Guillaume Pothier;Éric Tanter;José Piquer

  • Partial behavioral reflection: spatial and temporal selection of reification

    Éric Tanter;Jacques Noyé;Denis Caromel;Pierre Cointe

  • Abstracting gradual typing

    Ronald Garcia;Alison M. Clark;Éric Tanter

  • A versatile kernel for multi-language AOP

    Éric Tanter;Jacques Noyé

  • An empirical study on the impact of static typing on software maintainability

    Stefan Hanenberg;Sebastian Kleinschmager;Romain Robbes;Éric Tanter

  • Context-aware aspects

    Éric Tanter;Kris Gybels;Marcus Denker;Alexandre Bergel

  • How (and why) developers use the dynamic features of programming languages: the case of smalltalk

    Oscar Callaú;Romain Robbes;Éric Tanter;David Röthlisberger

  • Back to the Future: Omniscient Debugging

    G. Pothier;E. Tanter

  • First-class state change in plaid

    Joshua Sunshine;Karl Naden;Sven Stork;Jonathan Aldrich

  • Gradual typestate

    Roger Wolff;Ronald Garcia;Éric Tanter;Jonathan Aldrich

  • Foundations of Typestate-Oriented Programming

    Ronald Garcia;Éric Tanter;Roger Wolff;Jonathan Aldrich

  • Do static type systems improve the maintainability of software systems? An empirical study

    Sebastian Kleinschmager;Romain Robbes;Andreas Stefik;Stefan Hanenberg

  • An empirical study of the influence of static type systems on the usability of undocumented software

    Clemens Mayer;Stefan Hanenberg;Romain Robbes;Éric Tanter

  • AspectScript: expressive aspects for the web

    Rodolfo Toledo;Paul Leger;Éric Tanter

  • Expressive scoping of dynamically-deployed aspects

    Éric Tanter

  • A theory of gradual effect systems

    Felipe Bañados Schwerter;Ronald Garcia;Éric Tanter

  • How developers use the dynamic features of programming languages: the case of smalltalk

    Oscar Callaú;Romain Robbes;Éric Tanter;David Röthlisberger

  • Aspects of composition in the reflex AOP kernel

    Éric Tanter

  • Execution levels for aspect-oriented programming

    Éric Tanter

  • Declarative, formal, and extensible syntax definition for aspectJ

    Martin Bravenboer;Éric Tanter;Eelco Visser

  • Gradual typing for Smalltalk

    Esteban Allende;Oscar Callaú;Johan Fabry;Éric Tanter

  • Unanticipated partial behavioral reflection

    David Röthlisberger;Marcus Denker;Éric Tanter

Frequent Co-Authors

Jonathan Aldrich
Jonathan Aldrich Carnegie Mellon University
Romain Robbes
Romain Robbes University of Bordeaux
Eric Bodden
Eric Bodden University of Paderborn
Walter Binder
Walter Binder Universita della Svizzera Italiana
Yasutaka Kamei
Yasutaka Kamei Kyushu University
Ahmed E. Hassan
Ahmed E. Hassan Queen's University
Meiyappan Nagappan
Meiyappan Nagappan University of Waterloo
Audris Mockus
Audris Mockus University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Shane McIntosh
Shane McIntosh McGill University
Stéphane Ducasse
Stéphane Ducasse University of Lille

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA can open a wide range of opportunities, especially with the growth of flexible learning paths. Many students pursue specialized areas online, such as an online theoretical physics degree, which provides a strong analytical foundation relevant across science and tech fields.

Data-driven roles are also in demand. Choosing from data science degrees helps graduates develop skills in analytics, machine learning, and big data, supporting careers in finance, healthcare, and beyond.

Another path is advancing your expertise with an online master’s in electrical engineering degree. This can lead to roles developing cutting-edge technology in fields such as robotics, telecommunications, and energy systems.

If you’re seeking a quicker transition into the workforce, consider exploring certificate programs that pay well. These certifications focus on in-demand skills and can boost your employability in a shorter time frame.

Whether you want deep specialization or an expedited route to a high-paying job, online options offer the flexibility and diversity to match your career goals in tech.

Best Scientists Citing Éric Tanter

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles