World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
69
Citations
17228
World Ranking
1986
National Ranking
1004

Matthias Felleisen publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthias Felleisen sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 253 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Matthias Felleisen D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthias Felleisen sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 69 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2009 - ACM Karl V. Karlstrom Outstanding Educator Award For his visionary and long-term contributions to K-12 outreach programs, innovative textbooks, and pedagogically motivated software.
  • 2006 - ACM Fellow For contributions to programming languages and development environments.

Overview

Matthias Felleisen is a researcher affiliated with Northeastern University in the United States. Their work primarily focuses on the field of Computer Science, with specific attention to areas such as Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems, and Software. Their research topics cover several specialized domains, including logic, programming, and type systems; software engineering research; advanced software engineering methodologies; model-driven software engineering techniques; software testing and debugging techniques; parallel computing and optimization techniques; and teaching and learning programming.

Felleisen's recent published papers span a variety of venues and topics. Notable papers include:

  • Macros for domain-specific languages, 2020, Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages
  • How to evaluate blame for gradual types, 2021, Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages
  • Trace contracts, 2023, Journal of Functional Programming
  • Typed-Untyped Interactions: A Comparative Analysis, 2023, ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems
  • A Transient Semantics for Typed Racket, 2021, The Art Science and Engineering of Programming

The most frequent coauthors collaborating with Felleisen include Christos Dimoulas (12 joint publications), Ben Greenman (10), Lukas Lazarek (4), Sam Caldwell (4), and Tony Garnock-Jones (4). These collaborations contribute to the consistency and development of topics across their joint research outputs.

Felleisen's publication record is associated with several key venues where multiple papers have appeared. These venues include:

  • Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages (6 publications)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (4 publications)
  • Journal of Functional Programming (3 publications)
  • The Art Science and Engineering of Programming (3 publications)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (2 publications)

Their contributions to programming languages and development environments were recognized in 2006 with the ACM Fellow award. In 2009, Felleisen received the ACM Karl V. Karlstrom Outstanding Educator Award, citing their work on K-12 outreach programs, innovative textbooks, and software designed with pedagogical motivations.

Best Publications

  • A Syntactic Approach to Type Soundness

    A.K. Wright;M. Felleisen

  • The essence of compiling with continuations

    Cormac Flanagan;Amr Sabry;Bruce F. Duba;Matthias Felleisen

  • The revised report on the syntactic theories of sequential control and state

    Matthias Felleisen;Robert Hieb

  • Reasoning about programs in continuation-passing style.

    Amr Sabry;Matthias Felleisen

  • Classes and mixins

    Matthew Flatt;Shriram Krishnamurthi;Matthias Felleisen

  • Contracts for higher-order functions

    Robert Bruce Findler;Matthias Felleisen

  • The call-by-need lambda calculus

    Zena M. Ariola;Matthias Felleisen

  • A call-by-need lambda calculus

    Zena M. Ariola;John Maraist;Martin Odersky;Matthias Felleisen

  • On the expressive power of programming languages

    Matthias Felleisen

  • The theory and practice of first-class prompts

    Mattias Felleisen

  • The design and implementation of typed scheme

    Sam Tobin-Hochstadt;Matthias Felleisen

  • Hygienic macro expansion

    Eugene Kohlbecker;Daniel P. Friedman;Matthias Felleisen;Bruce Duba

  • Semantics Engineering with PLT Redex

    Matthias Felleisen;Robert Bruce Findler;Matthew Flatt

  • DrScheme: a programming environment for Scheme

    Robert Bruce Findler;John Clements;Cormac Flanagan;Matthew Flatt

  • A syntactic theory of sequential control

    Mattias Felleisen;D. P. Friedman;E. Kohlbecker;B. Duba

  • Units: cool modules for HOT languages

    Matthew Flatt;Matthias Felleisen

  • How to Design Programs

    Shriram Krishnamurthi;Robert Bruce Findler;Matthias Felleisen;Matthew Flatt

  • Interlanguage migration: from scripts to programs

    Sam Tobin-Hochstadt;Matthias Felleisen

  • Control operators, the SECD-machine, and the λ-calculus.

    Matthias Felleisen;Daniel P. Friedman

  • The calculi of lambda-nu-cs conversion: a syntactic theory of control and state in imperative higher-order programming languages

    Matthias Felleisen

  • The Design and Implementation of Typed Scheme: From Scripts to Programs

    Sam Tobin-Hochstadt;Matthias Felleisen

Frequent Co-Authors

Matthew Flatt
Matthew Flatt University of Utah
Shriram Krishnamurthi
Shriram Krishnamurthi Brown University
Robert Bruce Findler
Robert Bruce Findler Northwestern University
Cormac Flanagan
Cormac Flanagan University of California, Santa Cruz
Jan Vitek
Jan Vitek Northeastern University
Robert Harper
Robert Harper Carnegie Mellon University
Stephanie Weirich
Stephanie Weirich University of Pennsylvania
Philip Wadler
Philip Wadler University of Edinburgh
Greg Morrisett
Greg Morrisett Cornell University
Martin Odersky
Martin Odersky École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA can open doors to a wide range of related online degrees and career pathways. Many students look for options that balance affordability, speed, and career potential. For example, those interested in management roles within tech can benefit from enrolling in one of the cheapest mba programs available online, allowing for career advancement without significant financial stress.

If you’re eager to upskill quickly, consider a 1 year masters program—perfect for building expertise fast and entering the workforce sooner. Additionally, some students prioritize both convenience and lucrative outcomes by looking into easy degrees to get online that pay well, opening the door to high-paying fields with a shorter time commitment.

For those who want to specialize further, the tech field is evolving rapidly, making advanced study essential. Specializing in artificial intelligence is increasingly popular, so exploring the best online masters in artificial intelligence can be a strategic move for long-term success. These flexible programs ensure you’re well-equipped for tomorrow’s top careers.

Best Scientists Citing Matthias Felleisen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles