World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 43 7982 7755 3435 3306 120 7887

Mitchell Wand publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mitchell Wand between 1972 and 2020, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mitchell Wand published across 49 years, from 1972 to 2020, averaging 2.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 8 publications in 2008. 1 of the 121 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1972 to 2020. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 8. Peak 8 publications in 2008. 1972: 1 publication 1973: 1 publication 1974: 2 publications 1975: 2 publications 1976: 1 publication 1977: 1 publication 1978: 2 publications 1979: 2 publications 1980: 4 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 3 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 6 publications 1985: 4 publications 1986: 4 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 5 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 5 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 8 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 4 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 0 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 1 publication 2018: 2 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 1 publication
1972 2020

121 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mitchell Wand: publications per year, 1972 to 2020
Year Publications
1972 1
1973 1
1974 2
1975 2
1976 1
1977 1
1978 2
1979 2
1980 4
1981 0
1982 3
1983 0
1984 6
1985 4
1986 4
1987 4
1988 5
1989 2
1990 1
1991 5
1992 2
1993 2
1994 4
1995 5
1996 3
1997 3
1998 2
1999 5
2000 2
2001 5
2002 2
2003 4
2004 5
2005 2
2006 3
2007 1
2008 8
2009 2
2010 1
2011 4
2012 0
2013 1
2014 0
2015 0
2016 1
2017 1
2018 2
2019 0
2020 1
Total 121
Download as CSV

Mitchell Wand publications per year - data summary

  • Mitchell Wand, a Computer Science scholar from Northeastern University, has 121 publications recorded across 49 years, from 1972 to 2020.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1972 and the most recent to 2020.
  • The most productive year is 2008, with 8 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1972, 1973, 1976, 1977 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 6 of the 49 years in the span carry no publications at all (1981, 1983, 2012, 2014 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 2.5 papers per year over the whole span, or 2.8 per year counting only the 43 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2016-2020) hold 5 publications, 4% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1972-1988: 42 publications (2.5 per year); 1989-2005: 54 publications (3.2 per year); 2006-2020: 25 publications (1.7 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is declining.

Mitchell Wand publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mitchell Wand sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 112–121 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 120 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497 120
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Mitchell Wand publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 14,188 Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 97 ranges running from 32–41 to 991+ publications.
  • Mitchell Wand, a Computer Science scholar from Northeastern University, records 120 publications - the 15th percentile of the discipline.
  • 15% of ranked Computer Science scientists score the same or lower than Mitchell Wand, and about 85% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 202–211 publications range, and Mitchell Wand ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 142–151 publications, holding 609 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 272–281 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 991 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Mitchell Wand D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mitchell Wand sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821 43
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Mitchell Wand D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 14,188 Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 52 ranges running from 30–31 to 131+ D-Index.
  • Mitchell Wand, a Computer Science scholar from Northeastern University, records 43 D-Index - the 46th percentile of the discipline.
  • 46% of ranked Computer Science scientists score the same or lower than Mitchell Wand, and about 54% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 44–45 D-Index range, and Mitchell Wand ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 36–37 D-Index, holding 990 scientists (7% of the field).
  • 71% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 54–55 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2007 - ACM Fellow For contributions to type theory and program analysis.

Overview

Mitchell Wand is affiliated with Northeastern University in the United States. Their research focuses on areas within computer science, particularly in computational theory, artificial intelligence, and mathematics related to computation.

The following topics represent the main areas of Wand's work:

  • Logic, programming, and type systems
  • Semigroups and automata theory
  • Formal methods in verification

Wand's contributions span several subfields and specific areas, including computational theory and mathematics as well as artificial intelligence.

The scientist has published in recognized academic venues such as:

  • Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages

An example of a recent paper authored by Wand is:

  • "Hygienic macro technology," published in 2020 in Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages

Frequent collaborations include work with William Clinger.

In recognition of contributions to the field, Wand was named an ACM Fellow in 2007, with the citation noting achievements in type theory and program analysis.

Best Publications

  • Revised Report on the Algorithmic Language Scheme

    H. Abelson;R. K. Dybvig;C. T. Haynes;G. J. Rozas

  • Revised4 report on the algorithmic language scheme

    H. Abelson;R. K. Dybvig;C. T. Haynes;G. J. Rozas

  • Essentials of Programming Languages

    Daniel P. Friedman;Christopher T. Haynes;Mitchell Wand

  • Type inference for record concatenation and multiple inheritance

    Mitchell Wand

  • A semantics for advice and dynamic join points in aspect-oriented programming

    Mitchell Wand;Gregor Kiczales;Christopher Dutchyn

  • Complete Type Inference for Simple Objects

    Mitchell Wand

  • Continuation-based multiprocessing

    Mitchell Wand

  • Final algebra semantics and data type extensions

    Mitchell Wand

  • The mystery of the tower revealed: A nonreflective description of the reflective tower

    Mitchell Wand;Daniel P. Friedman

  • Continuation-Based Program Transformation Strategies

    Mitchell Wand

  • A Simple Algorithm and Proof for Type Inference1

    Mitchell Wand

  • Reification: Reflection without metaphysics

    Daniel P. Friedman;Mitchell Wand

  • Finding the source of type errors

    Mitchell Wand

  • Deriving Target Code as a Representation of Continuation Semantics

    Mitchell Wand

  • Small bisimulations for reasoning about higher-order imperative programs

    Vasileios Koutavas;Mitchell Wand

  • Obtaining coroutines with continuations

    Christopher T Haynes;Daniel P Friedman;Mitchell Wand

  • Continuations and coroutines

    Christopher T. Haynes;Daniel P. Friedman;Mitchell Wand

  • Continuation Semantics in Typed Lambda-Calculi (Summary)

    Albert R. Meyer;Mitchell Wand

  • Abstract continuations: a mathematical semantics for handling full jumps

    Matthias Felleisen;Mitch Wand;Daniel Friedman;Bruce Duba

  • Trampolined style

    Steven E. Ganz;Daniel P. Friedman;Mitchell Wand

  • A New Incompleteness Result for Hoare's System

    Mitchell Wand

  • Revised 5 Report on the Algorithmic Language

    Richard Kelsey;William Clinger;Jonathan Rees;H. Abelson

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniel Friedman
Daniel Friedman Indiana University
Jens Palsberg
Jens Palsberg University of California, Los Angeles
Gary T. Leavens
Gary T. Leavens University of Central Florida
Shriram Krishnamurthi
Shriram Krishnamurthi Brown University
James R. Larus
James R. Larus École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Gregor Kiczales
Gregor Kiczales University of British Columbia
Robert Harper
Robert Harper Carnegie Mellon University
Lori Pollock
Lori Pollock University of Delaware

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA opens doors to diverse online degrees and career pathways in STEM. If you’re considering adjacent fields, an online environmental engineering degree could be a great fit, focusing on sustainability and environmental innovation.

For those interested in building and designing systems, an online mechanical engineering degree provides foundational knowledge applicable to robotics, aerospace, and automotive industries. Students fascinated by how the universe works can explore whether can you get a physics degree online, finding programs that combine flexibility with rigorous science training.

Data is shaping the future. If you want to analyze and utilize big data, a data science degree can offer hands-on learning in analytics, machine learning, and artificial intelligence. These online degrees provide flexibility for working professionals while expanding career options in IT, engineering, research, and data-driven industries.

Best Scientists Citing Mitchell Wand

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles