World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
40
Citations
7939
World Ranking
9202
National Ranking
3916

Martin Erwig publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Erwig sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 186 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Martin Erwig D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Erwig sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2008 - ACM Senior Member

Overview

Martin Erwig is affiliated with Oregon State University in the United States and has contributed to the field of computer science, with a focus on various subfields including artificial intelligence, information systems, computer science applications, software, and information systems and management.

The scientist's research spans several main topics, notably software engineering research, machine learning and data classification, logic, programming and type systems, teaching and learning programming, Bayesian modeling and causal inference, software testing and debugging techniques, and digital games and media.

Martin Erwig has published research in various venues. Some of the most frequent publication outlets include:

  • Journal of Functional Programming
  • Journal of Computer Languages
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • ACM SIGPLAN Notices
  • Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Martin Erwig illustrate a thematic connection to programming, optimization, and explanation in computing:

  • "Explainable dynamic programming," 2021, Journal of Functional Programming
  • "Explanations for combinatorial optimization problems," 2024, Journal of Computer Languages

Other notable papers for which they are not the primary author but which appear in the recent data include:

  • "Migrating gradual types," 2022, Journal of Functional Programming
  • "Explaining spreadsheets with spreadsheets (short paper)," 2020, ACM SIGPLAN Notices
  • "A visual notation for succinct program traces," 2023, Journal of Computer Languages

Frequent collaborators of Martin Erwig listed in the data include:

  • Prashant Kumar
  • Danila Fedorin
  • Divya Bajaj
  • Margaret Burnett

Professional recognition includes being awarded the status of ACM Senior Member in 2008.

Best Publications

  • A foundation for representing and querying moving objects

    Ralf Hartmut Güting;Michael H. Böhlen;Martin Erwig;Christian S. Jensen

  • The state of the art in end-user software engineering

    Amy J. Ko;Robin Abraham;Laura Beckwith;Alan Blackwell

  • Spatio-Temporal Data Types: An Approach to Modeling and Querying Moving Objects in Databases

    Martin Erwig;Ralf Hartmut Güting;Markus Schneider;Michalis Vazirgiannis

  • The graph Voronoi diagram with applications

    Martin Erwig

  • Spatio-temporal predicates

    M. Erwig;M. Schneider

  • Vague Regions

    Martin Erwig;Markus Schneider

  • Header and Unit Inference for Spreadsheets Through Spatial Analyses

    R. Abraham;M. Erwig

  • The Choice Calculus: A Representation for Software Variation

    Martin Erwig;Eric Walkingshaw

  • UCheck: A spreadsheet type checker for end users

    Robin Abraham;Martin Erwig

  • Abstract and discrete modeling of spatio-temporal data types

    Martin Erwig;Ralf Hartmut Güting;Markus Schneider;Michalis Vazirgiannis

  • ClassSheets: automatic generation of spreadsheet applications from object-oriented specifications

    Gregor Engels;Martin Erwig

  • Inductive graphs and functional graph algorithms

    Martin Erwig

  • Developments in spatio-temporal query languages

    M. Erwig;M. Schneider

  • Spatio-temporal Models and Languages: An Approach Based on Data Types.

    Ralf Hartmut Güting;Michael H. Böhlen;Martin Erwig;Christian S. Jensen

  • Inferring templates from spreadsheets

    Robin Abraham;Martin Erwig

  • Adding Apples and Oranges

    Martin Erwig;Margaret M. Burnett

  • FUNCTIONAL PEARLS: Probabilistic functional programming in Haskell

    Martin Erwig;Steve Kollmansberger

  • GoalDebug: A Spreadsheet Debugger for End Users

    Robin Abraham;Martin Erwig

  • Mutation Operators for Spreadsheets

    R. Abraham;M. Erwig

  • Heterogeneous visual languages-integrating visual and textual programming

    M. Erwig;B. Meyer

Frequent Co-Authors

Ralf Hartmut Güting
Ralf Hartmut Güting University of Hagen
Alan Fern
Alan Fern Oregon State University
Michalis Vazirgiannis
Michalis Vazirgiannis École Polytechnique
Margaret Burnett
Margaret Burnett Oregon State University
Christian S. Jensen
Christian S. Jensen Aalborg University
Alex Groce
Alex Groce Northern Arizona University
Gregor Engels
Gregor Engels University of Paderborn
Eric Bodden
Eric Bodden University of Paderborn
Gregg Rothermel
Gregg Rothermel North Carolina State University
Mary Beth Rosson
Mary Beth Rosson Pennsylvania State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science opens doors to many related fields with strong career prospects. For students seeking high-demand tech roles, a cyber security masters can set you on a path to protecting vital digital infrastructure, a sector where qualified professionals are increasingly sought after.

Beyond tech, organizational skills developed in Computer Science also transfer well to fields like construction management. An affordable online construction management degree offers a blend of technical and managerial training, making it ideal for those interested in overseeing complex projects.

Analytical and problem-solving abilities are also crucial in criminal justice. Pursuing a criminal justice major prepares graduates for diverse roles in law enforcement, legal systems, and cybersecurity within the public sector.

For those drawn to numbers and business, an online accounting degree remains a solid option. Accounting, like computer science, offers excellent remote study flexibility and leads to stable career paths in finance, auditing, and business analysis.

Each of these online degrees can complement a foundation in computer science, offering versatile and rewarding career opportunities across many industries.

Best Scientists Citing Martin Erwig

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles