World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
68
Citations
19728
World Ranking
2073
National Ranking
13

Dietmar Jannach publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dietmar Jannach sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 373 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Dietmar Jannach D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dietmar Jannach sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Dietmar Jannach is a researcher affiliated with the University of Klagenfurt in Austria. Their primary field of study is Computer Science, with significant contributions across various subfields including Information Systems, Artificial Intelligence, Management Science and Operations Research, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, and Software.

The main topics of their research work encompass:

  • Recommender Systems and Techniques
  • Advanced Bandit Algorithms Research
  • Topic Modeling
  • Software Engineering Research
  • Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
  • Spreadsheets and End-User Computing
  • Data Stream Mining Techniques

Their recent papers showcase a focus on recommendation systems and responsible AI, featuring the following publications:

  • "Multistakeholder recommendation: Survey and research directions," 2020, published in User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction
  • "Fairness in recommender systems: research landscape and future directions," 2023, published in User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction
  • "Empirical analysis of session-based recommendation algorithms," 2020, published in User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction
  • "Responsible media technology and AI: challenges and research directions," 2021, published in AI and Ethics
  • "Escaping the McNamara Fallacy: Toward More Impactful Recommender Systems Research," 2020, published in AI Magazine

Dietmar Jannach frequently collaborates with several co-authors, including Franz Wotawa, Birgit Hofer, Adil Mukhtar, Christoph Trattner, and Markus Zanker. These collaborations underline a broad network within their research community.

Their work is often published in venues such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • AI Magazine
  • ACM Transactions on Recommender Systems

Best Publications

  • Recommender Systems: An Introduction

    Dietmar Jannach;Markus Zanker;Alexander Felfernig;Gerhard Friedrich

  • Beyond accuracy: evaluating recommender systems by coverage and serendipity

    Mouzhi Ge;Carla Delgado-Battenfeld;Dietmar Jannach

  • Recommender Systems: RECENT DEVELOPMENTS

    Dietmar Jannach;Markus Zanker;Alexander Felfernig;Gerhard Friedrich

  • Are we really making much progress? A worrying analysis of recent neural recommendation approaches

    Maurizio Ferrari Dacrema;Paolo Cremonesi;Dietmar Jannach

  • Sequence-Aware Recommender Systems

    Massimo Quadrana;Paolo Cremonesi;Dietmar Jannach

  • When Recurrent Neural Networks meet the Neighborhood for Session-Based Recommendation

    Dietmar Jannach;Malte Ludewig

  • A Survey on Conversational Recommender Systems

    Dietmar Jannach;Ahtsham Manzoor;Wanling Cai;Li Chen

  • Consistency-based diagnosis of configuration knowledge bases

    Alexander Felfernig;Gerhard Friedrich;Dietmar Jannach;Markus Stumptner

  • A systematic review and taxonomy of explanations in decision support and recommender systems

    Ingrid Nunes;Ingrid Nunes;Dietmar Jannach

  • How should I explain? A comparison of different explanation types for recommender systems

    Fatih Gedikli;Dietmar Jannach;Mouzhi Ge

  • Measuring the Business Value of Recommender Systems

    Dietmar Jannach;Michael Jugovac

  • Evaluation of session-based recommendation algorithms

    Malte Ludewig;Dietmar Jannach

  • A Troubling Analysis of Reproducibility and Progress in Recommender Systems Research

    Maurizio Ferrari Dacrema;Simone Boglio;Paolo Cremonesi;Dietmar Jannach

  • News recommender systems – Survey and roads ahead

    Mozhgan Karimi;Dietmar Jannach;Michael Jugovac

  • Automated Generation of Music Playlists: Survey and Experiments

    Geoffray Bonnin;Dietmar Jannach

  • Multistakeholder recommendation: Survey and research directions

    Himan Abdollahpouri;Gediminas Adomavicius;Robin Burke;Ido Guy

  • Digital nudging with recommender systems: Survey and future directions

    Mathias Jesse;Dietmar Jannach

  • What recommenders recommend: an analysis of recommendation biases and possible countermeasures

    Dietmar Jannach;Lukas Lerche;Iman Kamehkhosh;Michael Jugovac

  • Conceptual modeling for configuration of mass-customizable products

    Alexander Felfernig;Gerhard Friedrich;Dietmar Jannach

  • An Integrated Environment for the Development of Knowledge-Based Recommender Applications

    Alexander Felfernig;Gerhard Friedrich;Dietmar Jannach;Markus Zanker

  • UML AS DOMAIN SPECIFIC LANGUAGE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF KNOWLEDGE-BASED CONFIGURATION SYSTEMS

    Alexander Felfernig;Gerhard E. Friedrich;Dietmar Jannach

  • Recommendation quality, transparency, and website quality for trust-building in recommendation agents

    Mehrbakhsh Nilashi;Dietmar Jannach;Othman bin Ibrahim;Mohammad Dalvi Esfahani

  • Recommender systems — beyond matrix completion

    Dietmar Jannach;Paul Resnick;Alexander Tuzhilin;Markus Zanker

  • UML as Domain Specific Language for the construction of Knowledge-Based Configuration Systems

    A. Felfernig;G. Friedrich;D. Jannach;Dietmar Jannach

  • Recommender Systems: Introduction

    Dietmar Jannach;Markus Zanker;Alexander Felfernig;Gerhard Friedrich

Frequent Co-Authors

Alexander Felfernig
Alexander Felfernig Graz University of Technology
Gerhard Friedrich
Gerhard Friedrich University of Klagenfurt
Markus Zanker
Markus Zanker Free University of Bozen-Bolzano
Markus Stumptner
Markus Stumptner University of Adelaide
Bamshad Mobasher
Bamshad Mobasher DePaul University
Paolo Cremonesi
Paolo Cremonesi Polytechnic University of Milan
Franz Wotawa
Franz Wotawa Graz University of Technology
Gediminas Adomavicius
Gediminas Adomavicius University of Minnesota
Hermann Hellwagner
Hermann Hellwagner University of Klagenfurt
Alfred Kobsa
Alfred Kobsa University of California, Irvine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA can open a wide range of academic and career opportunities beyond traditional tech roles. Many students choose related online fields that combine technical expertise with other interests, making for flexible career pathways.

For those interested in law and public service, a criminal justice degree price can be an important factor when considering an online option. Similarly, individuals drawn to business and finance may look for a cheap online accounting degree as a cost-effective way to enter a stable career with advancement potential.

Tech enthusiasts aiming for a blend of computer science and analytics should consider a cheap online masters degree in data science. This advanced credential can be completed flexibly online and leads to high-paying data-driven roles. Meanwhile, those interested in technology’s applications in the built environment may pursue a construction management accelerated degree to quickly gain project management skills for the construction industry.

These online degrees offer diverse routes for students to adapt their studies and careers to fit their interests and budgets, all while leveraging their computer science background.

Best Scientists Citing Dietmar Jannach

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles