World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 35 11487 11159 377 374 247 7840

Pasquale Lops publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Pasquale Lops between 1997 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Pasquale Lops published across 29 years, from 1997 to 2025, averaging 9.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2015. 15 of the 266 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2015. 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 3 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 15 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 14 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 15 publications 2013: 18 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 20 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 17 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 17 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 9 publications
1997 2025

266 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Pasquale Lops: publications per year, 1997 to 2025
Year Publications
1997 1
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 1
2002 3
2003 9
2004 5
2005 6
2006 7
2007 15
2008 11
2009 14
2010 10
2011 11
2012 15
2013 18
2014 9
2015 20
2016 13
2017 17
2018 13
2019 17
2020 10
2021 9
2022 6
2023 11
2024 6
2025 9
Total 266
Download as CSV

Pasquale Lops publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pasquale Lops sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 242–251 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 247 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408 247
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Pasquale Lops D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pasquale Lops sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34–35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918 35
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Pasquale Lops is affiliated with the University of Bari Aldo Moro in Italy and specializes in computer science with a focus on artificial intelligence and information systems. Their research spans several subfields including communication, management science and operations research, and computer vision and pattern recognition.

The scientist's work covers a range of topics in computer science, with notable emphasis on:

  • Topic Modeling
  • Recommender Systems and Techniques
  • Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Wikis in Education and Collaboration
  • Advanced Graph Neural Networks
  • Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
  • Technology Use by Older Adults

Pasquale Lops has contributed to publications in various venues, with frequent appearances in:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction
  • Journal of Intelligent Information Systems
  • Information Systems
  • OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University)

Their recent papers include:

  • "Generating post hoc review-based natural language justifications for recommender systems" (2020), published in User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction
  • "Context-aware graph-based recommendations exploiting Personalized PageRank" (2021), published in Knowledge-Based Systems
  • "AI-based decision support system for public procurement" (2023), published in Information Systems
  • "Myrror: a platform for holistic user modeling" (2020), published in User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction
  • "ClayRS: An end-to-end framework for reproducible knowledge-aware recommender systems" (2023), published in Information Systems

Throughout their career, Pasquale Lops has frequently collaborated with several coauthors including:

  • Giovanni Semeraro
  • Pierpaolo Basile
  • Marco de Gemmis
  • Lucia Siciliani
  • Cataldo Musto

Best Publications

  • Content-based Recommender Systems: State of the Art and Trends

    Pasquale Lops;Marco de Gemmis;Giovanni Semeraro

  • Semantics-Aware Content-Based Recommender Systems

    Marco de Gemmis;Pasquale Lops;Cataldo Musto;Fedelucio Narducci

  • A content-collaborative recommender that exploits WordNet-based user profiles for neighborhood formation

    Marco Degemmis;Pasquale Lops;Giovanni Semeraro

  • Introducing Serendipity in a Content-Based Recommender System

    L. Iaquinta;M. de Gemmis;P. Lops;G. Semeraro

  • Integrating tags in a semantic content-based recommender

    Marco de Gemmis;Pasquale Lops;Giovanni Semeraro;Pierpaolo Basile

  • Trends in Content-based Recommendation: Preface to the Special Issue on Recommender Systems based on Rich Item Descriptions

    Pasquale Lops;Dietmar Jannach;Cataldo Musto;Toine Bogers

  • An investigation on the serendipity problem in recommender systems

    Marco de Gemmis;Pasquale Lops;Giovanni Semeraro;Cataldo Musto

  • Learning Word Embeddings from Wikipedia for Content-Based Recommender Systems

    Cataldo Musto;Giovanni Semeraro;Marco de Gemmis;Pasquale Lops

  • Human Decision Making and Recommender Systems

    Li Chen;Marco de Gemmis;Alexander Felfernig;Pasquale Lops

  • Ontologically-Enriched unified user modeling for cross-system personalization

    Bhaskar Mehta;Claudia Niederee;Avare Stewart;Marco Degemmis

  • Combining learning and word sense disambiguation for intelligent user profiling

    Giovanni Semeraro;Marco Degemmis;Pasquale Lops;Pierpaolo Basile

  • Personalized finance advisory through case-based recommender systems and diversification strategies

    Cataldo Musto;Giovanni Semeraro;Pasquale Lops;Marco de Gemmis

  • A Multi-criteria Recommender System Exploiting Aspect-based Sentiment Analysis of Users' Reviews

    Cataldo Musto;Marco de Gemmis;Giovanni Semeraro;Pasquale Lops

  • ExpLOD: A Framework for Explaining Recommendations based on the Linked Open Data Cloud

    Cataldo Musto;Fedelucio Narducci;Pasquale Lops;Marco De Gemmis

  • Knowledge infusion into content-based recommender systems

    Giovanni Semeraro;Pasquale Lops;Pierpaolo Basile;Marco de Gemmis

  • Content-based and collaborative techniques for tag recommendation: an empirical evaluation

    Pasquale Lops;Marco De Gemmis;Giovanni Semeraro;Cataldo Musto

  • Introducing linked open data in graph-based recommender systems

    Cataldo Musto;Pierpaolo Basile;Pasquale Lops;Marco de Gemmis

  • Linked open data-based explanations for transparent recommender systems

    Cataldo Musto;Fedelucio Narducci;Pasquale Lops;Marco de Gemmis

  • Word Embedding techniques for Content-based Recommender Systems: An empirical evaluation

    Cataldo Musto;Giovanni Semeraro;Marco de Gemmis;Pasquale Lops

  • Human decision making and recommender systems

    Anthony Jameson;MC Martijn Willemsen;Alexander Felfernig;Marco de Gemmis

Frequent Co-Authors

Giovanni Semeraro
Giovanni Semeraro University of Bari Aldo Moro
Marco de Gemmis
Marco de Gemmis University of Bari Aldo Moro
Alexander Felfernig
Alexander Felfernig Graz University of Technology
Peter Brusilovsky
Peter Brusilovsky University of Pittsburgh
Francesco Ricci
Francesco Ricci Free University of Bozen-Bolzano
Tommaso Di Noia
Tommaso Di Noia Polytechnic University of Bari
Floriana Esposito
Floriana Esposito University of Bari Aldo Moro
Li Chen
Li Chen Hong Kong Baptist University
Thomas Lukasiewicz
Thomas Lukasiewicz University of Oxford
Barbara Pernici
Barbara Pernici Polytechnic University of Milan

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a range of flexible online programs and career directions. Many online colleges that accept low gpa provide alternative entry points for students who may not meet traditional admission criteria, ensuring more people can start or continue their studies.

For students in a hurry to launch their careers, a 1 year computer science degree online offers an intensive, fast-tracked route to qualification without compromising educational quality.

Computer Science skills are also valuable in adjacent fields such as environmental science and engineering. If you’re interested in sustainability, understanding what you can do with an environmental science degree can highlight interdisciplinary opportunities blending technology and environmental stewardship.

Similarly, environmental engineering degrees online are increasingly popular, providing affordable pathways to careers at the intersection of engineering and digital innovation.

Best Scientists Citing Pasquale Lops

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles