World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
48
Citations
11971
World Ranking
6088
National Ranking
139

Giovanni Semeraro publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Giovanni Semeraro sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 457 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Giovanni Semeraro D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Giovanni Semeraro sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Giovanni Semeraro is affiliated with the University of Bari Aldo Moro in Italy, with a research focus primarily situated in the field of Computer Science. Their work encompasses several critical subfields, including Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems, Sociology and Political Science, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, and Communication.

The scientist's research topics predominantly cover recommender systems and techniques, which represent the largest segment of their work. Other principal areas include topic modeling, natural language processing techniques, AI in service interactions, advanced graph neural networks, speech and dialogue systems, and sentiment analysis and opinion mining.

Semeraro has contributed to various publication venues, publishing frequently in:

  • User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction
  • Journal of Intelligent Information Systems
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Italian Journal of Computational Linguistics
  • arXiv (Cornell University)

Among notable recent papers authored or coauthored by Semeraro, the following works stand out:

  • "Conversational Recommender Systems and natural language:" (2020), Decision Support Systems
  • "Towards Emotion-aware Recommender Systems: an Affective Coherence Model based on Emotion-driven Behaviors" (2020), Expert Systems with Applications
  • "HealthAssistantBot: A Personal Health Assistant for the Italian Language" (2020), IEEE Access
  • "Generating post hoc review-based natural language justifications for recommender systems" (2020), User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction
  • "Context-aware graph-based recommendations exploiting Personalized PageRank" (2021), Knowledge-Based Systems

The frequent coauthors collaborating with Semeraro include Marco de Gemmis, Pasquale Lops, Cataldo Musto, Pierpaolo Basile, and Marco Polignano. This indicates an established network within the research community, which supports work primarily around recommender systems and related fields.

Best Publications

  • Content-based Recommender Systems: State of the Art and Trends

    Pasquale Lops;Marco de Gemmis;Giovanni Semeraro

  • A comparative analysis of methods for pruning decision trees

    F. Esposito;D. Malerba;G. Semeraro;J. Kay

  • Semantics-Aware Content-Based Recommender Systems

    Marco de Gemmis;Pasquale Lops;Cataldo Musto;Fedelucio Narducci

  • A content-collaborative recommender that exploits WordNet-based user profiles for neighborhood formation

    Marco Degemmis;Pasquale Lops;Giovanni Semeraro

  • Introducing Serendipity in a Content-Based Recommender System

    L. Iaquinta;M. de Gemmis;P. Lops;G. Semeraro

  • Integrating tags in a semantic content-based recommender

    Marco de Gemmis;Pasquale Lops;Giovanni Semeraro;Pierpaolo Basile

  • A logic framework for the incremental inductive synthesis of Datalog theories

    G. Semeraro;F. Esposito;D. Malerba;N. Fanizzi

  • An Enhanced Lesk Word Sense Disambiguation Algorithm through a Distributional Semantic Model

    Pierpaolo Basile;Annalina Caputo;Giovanni Semeraro

  • AlBERTo: Italian BERT Language Understanding Model for NLP Challenging Tasks Based on Tweets.

    M. Polignano;P. Basile;M. de Gemmis;G. Semeraro

  • An investigation on the serendipity problem in recommender systems

    Marco de Gemmis;Pasquale Lops;Giovanni Semeraro;Cataldo Musto

  • A Comparison of Lexicon-based Approaches for Sentiment Analysis of Microblog Posts.

    Cataldo Musto;Giovanni Semeraro;Marco Polignano

  • Learning Word Embeddings from Wikipedia for Content-Based Recommender Systems

    Cataldo Musto;Giovanni Semeraro;Marco de Gemmis;Pasquale Lops

  • Centroid-based Text Summarization through Compositionality of Word Embeddings

    Gaetano Rossiello;Pierpaolo Basile;Giovanni Semeraro

  • Human Decision Making and Recommender Systems

    Li Chen;Marco de Gemmis;Alexander Felfernig;Pasquale Lops

  • MULTISTRATEGY LEARNING FOR DOCUMENT RECOGNITION

    Floriana Esposito;Donato Malerba;Giovanni Semeraro

  • Multistrategy Theory Revision: Induction and Abductionin INTHELEX

    Floriana Esposito;Giovanni Semeraro;Nicola Fanizzi;Stefano Ferilli

  • Ontologically-Enriched unified user modeling for cross-system personalization

    Bhaskar Mehta;Claudia Niederee;Avare Stewart;Marco Degemmis

  • Mapping Twitter hate speech towards social and sexual minorities: a lexicon-based approach to semantic content analysis

    Vittorio Lingiardi;Nicola Carone;Giovanni Semeraro;Cataldo Musto

  • Combining learning and word sense disambiguation for intelligent user profiling

    Giovanni Semeraro;Marco Degemmis;Pasquale Lops;Pierpaolo Basile

  • Personalized finance advisory through case-based recommender systems and diversification strategies

    Cataldo Musto;Giovanni Semeraro;Pasquale Lops;Marco de Gemmis

  • An experimental page layout recognition system for office document automatic classification: an integrated approach for inductive generalization

    F. Esposito;D. Malerba;G. Semeraro;E. Annese

  • Human decision making and recommender systems

    Anthony Jameson;MC Martijn Willemsen;Alexander Felfernig;Marco de Gemmis

Frequent Co-Authors

Pasquale Lops
Pasquale Lops University of Bari Aldo Moro
Marco de Gemmis
Marco de Gemmis University of Bari Aldo Moro
Floriana Esposito
Floriana Esposito University of Bari Aldo Moro
Donato Malerba
Donato Malerba University of Bari Aldo Moro
Alexander Felfernig
Alexander Felfernig Graz University of Technology
Peter Brusilovsky
Peter Brusilovsky University of Pittsburgh
Dunja Mladenic
Dunja Mladenic Jožef Stefan Institute
Francesco Ricci
Francesco Ricci Free University of Bozen-Bolzano
Andreas Hotho
Andreas Hotho University of Würzburg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring additional educational routes can open doors to a wider range of careers in technology, business, and beyond. For those seeking advanced expertise at a reduced cost, consider looking into affordable online doctoral programs that allow you to specialize while keeping expenses in check.

If your goal is to fast-track your academic achievements, edd online programs offer accelerated pathways to advanced credentials, often allowing for quicker entry into leadership or academic roles.

Not ready to commit to a four-year degree? Earning your associate's degree online in as little as six months is a practical choice for those seeking foundational skills and faster job prospects.

Business knowledge is a valuable asset in tech careers, so understanding online business degree cost is key for students considering a dual focus or those planning entrepreneurial paths.

By researching these alternative online degree pathways, you can tailor your learning experience and chart a career path that aligns with your timeline, budget, and professional aspirations.

Best Scientists Citing Giovanni Semeraro

Trending Scientists