World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
44
Citations
6177
World Ranking
7697
National Ranking
3325

Kurt Piersol publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kurt Piersol sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 148 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Kurt Piersol D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kurt Piersol sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kurt Piersol is affiliated with Apple in the United States. Their professional work is based within the United States, indicating involvement in research and development activities likely connected to the technology sector.

No detailed records of recent papers, co-authors, or publication venues were provided, limiting visibility into specific research outputs or collaborations. There is also no data regarding publications in academic books or distinct fields of study.

Given the absence of specified main fields, subfields, and topics, the particular areas of scientific investigation or specialization remain unlisted.

There is no information about awards or recognitions attributed to Kurt Piersol, nor data suggesting a deceased status. The profile therefore reflects an active professional in the scientific or technological domain without additional documented bibliometric data.

Best Publications

  • Method and apparatus for automatic network configuration

    Toru Matsuda;Kurt Piersol;Shinsuke Teramura;Akio Urabe

  • Techniques for retrieving documents using an image capture device

    Daja Phillips;Kurt Piersol;Gregory J. Wolff

  • Triggering applications based on a captured text in a mixed media environment

    Jonathan J. Hull;Berna Erol;Jamey Graham;Peter E. Hart

  • System And Methods For Creation And Use Of A Mixed Media Environment

    Jonathan J. Hull;Berna Erol;Jamey Graham;Peter E. Hart

  • Printer with multimedia server

    Jonathan J. Hull;Jamey Graham;Peter E. Hart;Kurt W. Piersol

  • Authoring Tools Using A Mixed Media Environment

    Jonathan J. Hull;Berna Erol;Jamey Graham;Peter E. Hart

  • System and methods for portable device for mixed media system

    Jonathan J. Hull;Jamey Graham;Peter E. Hart;Kurt Piersol

  • Method And System For Document Fingerprint Matching In A Mixed Media Environment

    Jonathan J. Hull;Berna Erol;Peter E. Hart;Dar-Shyang Lee

  • Method and System for Multi-Tier Image Matching in a Mixed Media Environment

    Peter E. Hart;Berna Erol;Jonathan J. Hull;Kurt Piersol

  • Triggering actions with captured input in a mixed media environment

    Jonathan J. Hull;Berna Erol;Jamey Graham;Peter E. Hart

  • Method and apparatus for appliance host supported network-based application delivery

    Kurt W. Piersol

  • Method and system for image matching in a mixed media environment

    Jonathan J. Hull;Kurt Piersol;Berna Erol;Peter E. Hart

  • Printer with embedded retrieval and publishing interface

    Jonathan J. Hull;Kurt Wesley Piersol;Jamey Graham;Peter E. Hart

  • Transmission of event markers to data stream recorder

    Kurt Piersol

  • System and methods for use of voice mail and email in a mixed media environment

    Jamey Graham;Kevin Ridout;Stephen A. Weyl;Jonathan J. Hull

  • Networked printer with hardware and software interfaces for peripheral devices

    Peter Hart;Jonathan Hull;Jamey Graham;Kurt Piersol

  • Method and system for position-based image matching in a mixed media environment

    Jonathan J. Hull;Berna Erol;Peter E. Hart;Dar-Shyang Lee

  • System and methods for creation and use of a mixed media environment with geographic location information

    Jonathan J. Hull;Jamey Graham;Kurt Piersol;Daniel G. Van Olst

  • Multimedia print driver dialog interfaces

    Jonathan J. Hull;Jamey Graham;Peter E. Hart;Kurt Piersol

  • Method and apparatus for using gaps in document production as retrieval cues

    Gregory Wolff;Kurt Piersol;Dar-Shyang Lee;Jonathan Hull

Frequent Co-Authors

Jonathan J. Hull
Jonathan J. Hull Independent Scientist / Consultant, US
Gregory J. Wolff
Gregory J. Wolff UnaMesa Association
Peter E. Hart
Peter E. Hart Independent Scientist / Consultant, US
Jamey Graham
Jamey Graham Ricoh (Japan)
Dar-Shyang Lee
Dar-Shyang Lee Google (United States)
Berna Erol
Berna Erol Ricoh (Japan)
Edward L. Schwartz
Edward L. Schwartz Ricoh (Japan)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a wide range of online degree options and career paths. Many students begin their journey by enrolling in famous online colleges, which can provide flexible schedules and accredited programs tailored to your interests.

Beyond traditional computer science, students can specialize in areas with strong career growth. For example, if you’re interested in gaming, consider a video game design program to learn about interactive media and digital entertainment. Cybersecurity is another critical field, with the demand for professionals rising steadily. Explore your options with a cyber security degree to help protect digital data and networks.

Computer science skills also transfer well to other industries. For instance, those interested in technology management might look into a construction management degree, where digital tools and software are increasingly essential. These pathways demonstrate the versatility of a computer science background when combined with online learning.

Best Scientists Citing Kurt Piersol

Recently Published Articles