| Discipline name | D-Index | World Ranking | National Ranking | Publications | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 31 | 13388 | 5359 | 47 | 7029 |
The chart shows the history of publications by James Quentin Stafford-Fraser between 2005 and 2013, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. James Quentin Stafford-Fraser published across 9 years, from 2005 to 2013, averaging 9.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 68 publications in 2005. 2 of the 82 publications appeared in the last two years.
82 publications in total across all disciplines
| Year | Publications |
|---|---|
| 2005 | 68 |
| 2006 | 7 |
| 2007 | 0 |
| 2008 | 1 |
| 2009 | 1 |
| 2010 | 3 |
| 2011 | 0 |
| 2012 | 1 |
| 2013 | 1 |
| Total | 82 |
The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James Quentin Stafford-Fraser sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 47 publications — 1st percentile
1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.
| Publications | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 32–41 | 7 | |
| 42–51 | 22 | 47 |
| 52–61 | 82 | |
| 62–71 | 134 | |
| 72–81 | 249 | |
| 82–91 | 324 | |
| 92–101 | 421 | |
| 102–111 | 420 | |
| 112–121 | 497 | |
| 122–131 | 544 | |
| 132–141 | 555 | |
| 142–151 | 609 | |
| 152–161 | 559 | |
| 162–171 | 534 | |
| 172–181 | 556 | |
| 182–191 | 583 | |
| 192–201 | 519 | |
| 202–211 | 508 | |
| 212–221 | 490 | |
| 222–231 | 437 | |
| 232–241 | 423 | |
| 242–251 | 408 | |
| 252–261 | 377 | |
| 262–271 | 301 | |
| 272–281 | 335 | |
| 282–291 | 320 | |
| 292–301 | 293 | |
| 302–311 | 250 | |
| 312–321 | 238 | |
| 322–331 | 206 | |
| 332–341 | 209 | |
| 342–351 | 208 | |
| 352–361 | 162 | |
| 362–371 | 176 | |
| 372–381 | 127 | |
| 382–391 | 158 | |
| 392–401 | 128 | |
| 402–411 | 104 | |
| 412–421 | 94 | |
| 422–431 | 99 | |
| 432–441 | 83 | |
| 442–451 | 108 | |
| 452–461 | 73 | |
| 462–471 | 77 | |
| 472–481 | 69 | |
| 482–491 | 84 | |
| 492–501 | 62 | |
| 502–511 | 54 | |
| 512–521 | 57 | |
| 522–531 | 51 | |
| 532–541 | 51 | |
| 542–551 | 32 | |
| 552–561 | 38 | |
| 562–571 | 28 | |
| 572–581 | 43 | |
| 582–591 | 33 | |
| 592–601 | 41 | |
| 602–611 | 32 | |
| 612–621 | 28 | |
| 622–631 | 25 | |
| 632–641 | 27 | |
| 642–651 | 17 | |
| 652–661 | 20 | |
| 662–671 | 17 | |
| 672–681 | 15 | |
| 682–691 | 14 | |
| 692–701 | 21 | |
| 702–711 | 13 | |
| 712–721 | 12 | |
| 722–731 | 19 | |
| 732–741 | 14 | |
| 742–751 | 12 | |
| 752–761 | 10 | |
| 762–771 | 10 | |
| 772–781 | 11 | |
| 782–791 | 10 | |
| 792–801 | 11 | |
| 802–811 | 8 | |
| 812–821 | 8 | |
| 822–831 | 7 | |
| 832–841 | 11 | |
| 842–851 | 10 | |
| 852–861 | 5 | |
| 862–871 | 9 | |
| 872–881 | 4 | |
| 882–891 | 6 | |
| 892–901 | 3 | |
| 902–911 | 6 | |
| 912–921 | 3 | |
| 922–931 | 2 | |
| 932–941 | 2 | |
| 942–951 | 2 | |
| 952–961 | 3 | |
| 962–971 | 3 | |
| 972–981 | 3 | |
| 982–990 | 5 | |
| 991+ | 100 |
The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James Quentin Stafford-Fraser sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 31 D-Index — 6th percentile
6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.
| D-Index | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 30–31 | 879 | 31 |
| 32–33 | 983 | |
| 34–35 | 918 | |
| 36–37 | 990 | |
| 38–39 | 968 | |
| 40–41 | 907 | |
| 42–43 | 821 | |
| 44–45 | 763 | |
| 46–47 | 689 | |
| 48–49 | 543 | |
| 50–51 | 543 | |
| 52–53 | 518 | |
| 54–55 | 500 | |
| 56–57 | 458 | |
| 58–59 | 400 | |
| 60–61 | 337 | |
| 62–63 | 308 | |
| 64–65 | 292 | |
| 66–67 | 249 | |
| 68–69 | 213 | |
| 70–71 | 192 | |
| 72–73 | 189 | |
| 74–75 | 165 | |
| 76–77 | 139 | |
| 78–79 | 119 | |
| 80–81 | 121 | |
| 82–83 | 113 | |
| 84–85 | 88 | |
| 86–87 | 87 | |
| 88–89 | 75 | |
| 90–91 | 69 | |
| 92–93 | 57 | |
| 94–95 | 46 | |
| 96–97 | 38 | |
| 98–99 | 34 | |
| 100–101 | 36 | |
| 102–103 | 27 | |
| 104–105 | 37 | |
| 106–107 | 18 | |
| 108–109 | 31 | |
| 110–111 | 19 | |
| 112–113 | 16 | |
| 114–115 | 12 | |
| 116–117 | 20 | |
| 118–119 | 15 | |
| 120–121 | 5 | |
| 122–123 | 20 | |
| 124–125 | 8 | |
| 126–127 | 5 | |
| 128–129 | 7 | |
| 130 | 3 | |
| 131+ | 98 |
Martin Towle King;Dale L. Grover;Clifford A. Kushler;James Quentin Stafford-Fraser
Martin T. King;Dale L. Grover;Clifford A. Kushler;James Q. Stafford-Fraser
Martin Towle King;Dale L. Grover;Clifford A. Kushler;James Quentin Stafford-Fraser
Martin T. King;Dale L. Grover;Clifford A. Kushler;James Q. Stafford-Fraser
Martin T. King;Dale L. Grover;Clifford A. Kushler;James Q. Stafford-Fraser
Martin T. King;Clifford A. Kushler;James Quentin Stafford-Fraser;Dale Lawrence Grover
Martin Towle King;Dale L. Grover;Clifford A. Kushler;James Quentin Stafford-Fraser
Martin T King;Clifford A Kushler;James Quentin Stafford-Fraser;Dale Lawrence Grover
Martin T King;Clifford A Kushler;James Quentin Stafford-Fraser;Dale Lawrence Grover
Martin T. King;Dale L. Grover;Clifford A. Kushler;James Q. Stafford-Fraser
Martin T. King;Clifford A. Kushler;James Quentin Stafford-Fraser;Dale Lawrence Grover
Martin T. King;Dale L. Grover;Clifford A. Kushler;James Q. Stafford-Fraser
Martin T. King;Clifford A. Kushler;James Quentin Stafford-Fraser;Dale Lawrence Grover
Martin T. King;Dale L. Grover;Clifford A. Kushler;James Quentin Stafford-Fraser
Martin T. King;Dale L. Grover;Clifford A. Kushler;James Quentin Stafford-Fraser
Martin T. King;Clifford A. Kushler;James Quentin Stafford-Fraser
Martin Towle King;Dale L. Grover;Clifford A. Kushler;James Quentin Stafford-Fraser
Martin T King;Clifford A Kushler;James Quentin Stafford-Fraser;Dale Lawrence Grover
Martin T. King;Dale L. Grover;Clifford A. Kushler;James Quentin Stafford-Fraser
Martin T. King;Dale L. Grover;Clifford A. Kushler;James Quentin Stafford-Fraser
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.
Exploring online study options in Computer Science opens doors for varied learners. Flexible programs make it possible to start with an online associate's degree, ideal for students seeking quick entry into tech fields or a stepping stone to further education.
Graduates aiming to unlock specialized opportunities might pursue one of the most useful masters degrees in demand, such as Computer Science, Data Science, or Cybersecurity. These advanced qualifications can significantly boost salary potential and career mobility in the tech sector.
Affordability is a major concern for many students. Fortunately, there are cheap online colleges that provide recognized Computer Science programs without a high price tag. Additionally, prospective students with academic challenges can still find opportunities at some of the best colleges for low gpa, making the field more accessible to all backgrounds.
No matter your educational history or career goals, online pathways in Computer Science ensure you can find a program that fits your needs and ambitions.