World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 41 8618 8373 3693 3549 53 12136

John D. Haddick publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by John D. Haddick between 2008 and 2020, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. John D. Haddick published across 13 years, from 2008 to 2020, averaging 5.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 29 publications in 2012. 2 of the 69 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2008 to 2020. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 29. Peak 29 publications in 2012. 2008: 1 publication 2009: 0 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 15 publications 2012: 29 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 2 publications
2008 2020

69 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
John D. Haddick: publications per year, 2008 to 2020
Year Publications
2008 1
2009 0
2010 0
2011 15
2012 29
2013 0
2014 9
2015 5
2016 4
2017 4
2018 0
2019 0
2020 2
Total 69
Download as CSV

John D. Haddick publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John D. Haddick sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 52–61 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 53 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82 53
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

John D. Haddick D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John D. Haddick sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907 41
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Optics
  • Artificial intelligence
  • Computer vision

Eyepiece, Optics, Computer graphics, Near eye display and Artificial intelligence are his primary areas of study. His Eyepiece study frequently links to other fields, such as Multimedia. His work on Lens is typically connected to Content as part of general Optics study, connecting several disciplines of science.

The study of Artificial intelligence is intertwined with the study of Computer vision in a number of ways. His Optical head-mounted display research incorporates elements of Polarizer, Polarization, Field of view and Object. His research integrates issues of Head and Projection in his study of Augmented reality.

His most cited work include:

  • Video display modification based on sensor input for a see-through near-to-eye display (994 citations)
  • Local advertising content on an interactive head-mounted eyepiece (652 citations)
  • 3d positioning of augmented reality information (599 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Eyepiece, Artificial intelligence, Computer vision, Computer graphics and Augmented reality. John D. Haddick focuses mostly in the field of Eyepiece, narrowing it down to matters related to Real-time computing and, in some cases, Control. In the subject of general Artificial intelligence, his work in Head is often linked to Color filter array, thereby combining diverse domains of study.

His work on Image, Optical head-mounted display and Field of view as part of general Computer vision study is frequently linked to Windshield and Biometric data, therefore connecting diverse disciplines of science. John D. Haddick incorporates Computer graphics and Near eye display in his studies. His Augmented reality research entails a greater understanding of Human–computer interaction.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Eyepiece (35.29%)
  • Artificial intelligence (30.59%)
  • Computer vision (29.41%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2016-2020)?

  • Artificial intelligence (30.59%)
  • Computer vision (29.41%)
  • Human–computer interaction (9.41%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

John D. Haddick focuses on Artificial intelligence, Computer vision, Human–computer interaction, Ray and Color filter array. His Head, Movement tracking and Three-dimensional space study in the realm of Artificial intelligence interacts with subjects such as Front and Controller. Among his Computer vision studies, you can observe a synthesis of other disciplines of science such as Visually impaired, Radar MASINT and Process.

In his papers, John D. Haddick integrates diverse fields, such as Human–computer interaction, Content, Reading and User interface design. His work carried out in the field of Ray brings together such families of science as Lens, Pixel, Subpixel rendering and Field of view. Optics, Digital image and Digital media are fields of study that intersect with his Color filter array research.

Between 2016 and 2020, his most popular works were:

  • Head worn computer display systems (40 citations)
  • CHIEF RAY REPOINTING TO IMPROVE COLOR RENDITION (6 citations)
  • Controller movement tracking with light emitters (5 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Optics
  • Artificial intelligence
  • Computer vision

John D. Haddick mainly focuses on Acoustics, Computer graphics, Frame, Reference plane and Chassis.

Best Publications

  • Video display modification based on sensor input for a see-through near-to-eye display

    John D. Haddick;Ralph F. Osterhout

  • Local advertising content on an interactive head-mounted eyepiece

    Ralph F. Osterhout;John D. Haddick;Robert Michael Lohse;Kellie A. Wilder

  • 3d positioning of augmented reality information

    John N. Border;John D. Haddick

  • Head-worn adaptive display

    John D. Haddick;Ralph F. Osterhout

  • Eyepiece with uniformly illuminated reflective display

    Ralph F. Osterhout;John D. Haddick;Robert Michael Lohse;John N. Border

  • See-through computer display systems

    Ralph F. Osterhout;John N. Border;Robert Michael Lohse;John D. Haddick

  • Ar glasses specific user interface and control interface based on a connected external device type

    Ralph F. Osterhout;John D. Haddick;Robert Michael Lohse;Charles Cella

  • Projection triggering through an external marker in an augmented reality eyepiece

    Ralph F. Osterhout;John D. Haddick;Robert Michael Lohse;Kellie A. Wilder

  • See-through near-eye display glasses with a small scale image source

    John N. Border;John D. Haddick;Ralph F. Osterhout

  • See-through near-eye display glasses including a partially reflective, partially transmitting optical element

    John N. Border;John D. Haddick;Ralph F. Osterhout

  • AR glasses with predictive control of external device based on event input

    Ralph F. Osterhout;John D. Haddick;Robert Michael Lohse

  • Ar glasses specific control interface based on a connected external device type

    Ralph F. Osterhout;John D. Haddick;Robert Michael Lohse;Charles Cella

  • Ar glasses with event and user action control of external applications

    Ralph F. Osterhout;John D. Haddick;Robert Michael Lohse;Charles Cella

  • System and method for display content placement using distance and location information

    John D. Haddick;John N. Border

  • System and method for delivering content to a group of see-through near eye display eyepieces

    John D. Haddick;Ralph F. Osterhout

  • System and method for display content control during glasses movement

    John D. Haddick;John N. Border

  • Ar glasses with event and sensor triggered user movement control of ar eyepiece facilities

    Ralph F. Osterhout;John D. Haddick;Robert Michael Lohse;Charles Cella

  • Light control in head mounted displays

    John N. Border;Joseph Bietry;John D. Haddick;Robert Michael Lohse

  • Ar glasses with user action control and event input based control of eyepiece application

    Ralph F. Osterhout;John D. Haddick;Robert Michael Lohse;Charles Cella

  • Alignment control in an augmented reality headpiece

    John N. Border;John D. Haddick

Frequent Co-Authors

Ralph F. Osterhout
Ralph F. Osterhout Microsoft (United States)
Robert Michael Lohse
Robert Michael Lohse Microsoft (United States)
John Norvold Border
John Norvold Border Kodak (France)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As the demand for tech-savvy professionals continues to grow, exploring various online degrees can significantly broaden your options in computer science and related fields. Many students begin their journey with online associate degree programs, allowing for a fast, flexible entry point into the field. These programs often cover core fundamentals and can be completed in as little as six months.

If you want to combine technical knowledge with business acumen, choosing the best online business degree can help you prepare for leadership or management roles in tech-driven industries. Alternatively, an online bachelor degree offers a comprehensive pathway, covering advanced topics and boosting your career prospects in computer science.

For those interested in more technical specializations, pursuing engineering degrees online can open doors to fields like software, electrical, and systems engineering. No matter your pathway, these affordable and flexible options empower you to tailor your learning and achieve your career goals in the evolving digital landscape.

Best Scientists Citing John D. Haddick

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles