World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
86
Citations
37293
World Ranking
756
National Ranking
403

Thad Starner publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thad Starner sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 409 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Thad Starner D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thad Starner sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 86 D-Index — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Thad Starner is affiliated with the Georgia Institute of Technology in the United States. Their research spans several interconnected fields, including Computer Science, Neuroscience, and Engineering, with a focus on interdisciplinary studies related to human interaction and advanced sensing technologies.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Computer Science
  • Neuroscience
  • Engineering

Within these broader areas, Thad Starner's work covers specific subfields such as:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering

The main topics addressed in their research feature:

  • Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Interactive and Immersive Displays
  • Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
  • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Energy Harvesting in Wireless Networks
  • Hand Gesture Recognition Systems
  • Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology

Thad Starner has contributed to several research papers, with notable recent publications including:

  • "Flexible computational photodetectors for self-powered activity sensing" (2022), published in npj Flexible Electronics
  • "SilentSpeller: Towards mobile, hands-free, silent speech text entry using electropalatography" (2022), presented at the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
  • "UbiquiTouch" (2020), published in Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
  • "OptoSense" (2020), published in Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
  • "SATURN" (2020), published in Communications of the ACM

The frequent publication venues where their work appears include:

  • Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • IEEE Pervasive Computing
  • npj Flexible Electronics
  • Communications of the ACM

Thad Starner has collaborated closely with several researchers. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Gregory D. Abowd
  • Yuhui Zhao
  • Caitlyn Seim
  • Dingtian Zhang
  • Nivedita Arora

Best Publications

  • Energy scavenging for mobile and wireless electronics

    J.A. Paradiso;T. Starner

  • Real-time American sign language recognition using desk and wearable computer based video

    T. Starner;J. Weaver;A. Pentland

  • The Aware Home: A Living Laboratory for Ubiquitous Computing Research

    Cory D. Kidd;Robert Orr;Gregory D. Abowd;Christopher G. Atkeson

  • Using GPS to learn significant locations and predict movement across multiple users

    Daniel Ashbrook;Thad Starner

  • Human-powered wearable computing

    T. Starner

  • Real-time American Sign Language recognition from video using hidden Markov models

    T. Starner;A. Pentland

  • Visual Recognition of American Sign Language Using Hidden Markov Models.

    Thad E. Starner

  • Augmented reality through wearable computing

    Thad Starner;Steve Mann;Bradley Rhodes;Jeffrey Levine

  • Remembrance Agent: A continuously running automated information retrieval system

    Bradley J. Rhodes;Thad Starner

  • Method and system for facilitating wireless, full-body, real-time user interaction with a digitally represented visual environment

    Pattie E. Maes;Bruce M. Blumberg;Trevor J. Darrell;Thad E. Starner

  • Wearable devices: new ways to manage information

    M. Billinghurst;T. Starner

  • Learning significant locations and predicting user movement with GPS

    D. Ashbrook;T. Starner

  • Activity Recognition of Assembly Tasks Using Body-Worn Microphones and Accelerometers

    J.A. Ward;P. Lukowicz;G. Troster;T.E. Starner

  • Human Generated Power for Mobile Electronics

    Thad Starner;Joseph A. Paradiso

  • American sign language recognition with the kinect

    Zahoor Zafrulla;Helene Brashear;Thad Starner;Harley Hamilton

  • The gesture pendant: a self-illuminating, wearable, infrared computer vision system for home automation control and medical monitoring

    T. Starner;J. Auxier;D. Ashbrook;M. Gandy

  • Visually controlled graphics

    A. Azarbayejani;T. Starner;B. Horowitz;A. Pentland

  • Structured Light for Eye-Tracking

    Hayes Solos Raffle;Thad Eugene Starner;Josh Weaver;Edward Allen Keyes

  • Recognizing Workshop Activity Using Body Worn Microphones and Accelerometers

    Paul Lukowicz;Jamie A Ward;Holger Junker;Mathias Stäger

  • Methods and systems for a virtual input device

    Thad Eugene Starner;Liang-Yu Tom Chi;Luis Ricardo Prada Gomez

Frequent Co-Authors

Gregory D. Abowd
Gregory D. Abowd Northeastern University
Irfan Essa
Irfan Essa Georgia Institute of Technology
Omer T. Inan
Omer T. Inan Georgia Institute of Technology
Bastian Leibe
Bastian Leibe RWTH Aachen University
Kai Kunze
Kai Kunze Keio University
Paul Lukowicz
Paul Lukowicz German Research Centre for Artificial Intelligence
William Ribarsky
William Ribarsky University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Bernt Schiele
Bernt Schiele Max Planck Institute for Informatics
Zhong Lin Wang
Zhong Lin Wang Georgia Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science often opens doors to a wide range of career opportunities and further educational pathways. If you're considering ways to advance your credentials efficiently and affordably, there are several online options worth exploring.

For those interested in business or looking to complement their technical skills, pursuing the cheapest mba online could be a smart move. This pathway helps students quickly gain leadership and management expertise.

Many students seek speed and flexibility when upskilling. If you want to accelerate your studies, consider one year graduate programs. These intensive online degrees can help you reach your career goals faster.

If time-to-degree is crucial, research the quickest degree to get online. Several programs offer streamlined curricula that lead to high-paying tech jobs in less than two years.

Lastly, those interested in cutting-edge fields like artificial intelligence may benefit from the cheapest online masters in artificial intelligence. This advanced training supports roles in data science, automation, and machine learning.

Best Scientists Citing Thad Starner

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles