World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
66
Citations
17266
World Ranking
2328
National Ranking
1162

Clarence T. Tegreene publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Clarence T. Tegreene sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 571 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Clarence T. Tegreene D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Clarence T. Tegreene sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Electrical engineering
  • Mechanical engineering
  • Operating system

Clarence T. Tegreene mainly investigates Biomedical engineering, World Wide Web, Artificial intelligence, Database and Computer vision. His Biomedical engineering research focuses on Lumen in particular. His research combines Fingerprint and World Wide Web.

His work carried out in the field of Database brings together such families of science as Object and Code. His Computer vision study combines topics in areas such as Mechanism, Surgical Fasteners, Tissue sealant, Surgical staple and Surgical device. His work deals with themes such as Authorization, Component and Implementation, which intersect with Data file.

His most cited work include:

  • Steerable surgical stapler (848 citations)
  • Maneuverable surgical stapler (747 citations)
  • Gentle touch surgical stapler (731 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His main research concerns Artificial intelligence, Computer vision, Optics, Acoustics and Biomedical engineering. Acoustics connects with themes related to Controller in his study.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Artificial intelligence (9.28%)
  • Computer vision (7.72%)
  • Optics (7.51%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2013-2020)?

  • Artificial intelligence (9.28%)
  • Computer vision (7.72%)
  • Acoustics (7.09%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Artificial intelligence, Computer vision, Acoustics, Human–computer interaction and Real-time computing are his primary areas of study. Clarence T. Tegreene studies Computer vision, namely Image sensor. His Acoustics study frequently draws connections between adjacent fields such as Amplitude.

His Human–computer interaction research incorporates elements of User interface and Electronic circuit. His research is interdisciplinary, bridging the disciplines of Big data and Electronic circuit. His study in Simulation extends to Real-time computing with its themes.

Between 2013 and 2020, his most popular works were:

  • Systems and methods for providing wireless power to a power-receiving device, and related power-receiving devices (171 citations)
  • Reconfigurable unmanned aircraft system (78 citations)
  • System and method for management of airspace for unmanned aircraft (69 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Mechanical engineering
  • Electrical engineering
  • Artificial intelligence

Clarence T. Tegreene spends much of his time researching Computer vision, Artificial intelligence, Computer network, End user and Real-time computing. He combines subjects such as Computer program, Human–computer interaction and Representation with his study of Computer vision. Clarence T. Tegreene interconnects Order and Unit in the investigation of issues within End user.

His study looks at the relationship between Unit and fields such as Embedded system, as well as how they intersect with chemical problems. His research in Real-time computing intersects with topics in Object and Simulation. His Simulation study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Automotive engineering and Component.

Best Publications

  • Maneuverable surgical stapler

    Edward S. Boyden;Roderick A. Hyde;Muriel Y. Ishikawa;Eric C. Leuthardt

  • Gentle touch surgical stapler

    Edward S. Boyden;Roderick A. Hyde;Muriel Y. Ishikawa;Eric C. Leuthardt

  • Vasculature and lymphatic system imaging and ablation associated with a reservoir

    Roderick A. Hyde;Edward K. Y. Jung;Nathan P. Myhrvold;Clarence T. Tegreene

  • Systems and methods for providing wireless power to a power-receiving device, and related power-receiving devices

    Roderick A. Hyde;Jordin T. Kare;Clarence T. Tegreene;Lowell L. Wood

  • Wearable wireless power transmitter

    Philip Andrew Eckhoff;William Gates;Peter L. Hagelstein;Roderick A. Hyde

  • Correlating data indicating subjective user states associated with multiple users with data indicating objective occurrences

    Shawn P. Firminger;Jason Garms;Edward K.Y. Jung;Chris D. Karkanias

  • Context-sensitive query enrichment

    Marc E. Davis;Matthew G. Dyor;William Gates;Xuedong Huang

  • Lumen-traveling device

    Bran Ferren;W. Daniel Hillis;Roderick A. Hyde;Muriel Y. Ishikawa

  • Vision modification with reflected image

    W. Daniel Hillis;Roderick A. Hyde;Muriel Y. Ishikawa;Edward K. Y. Jung

  • Enhanced voice conferencing with history

    Richard T. Lord;Robert W. Lord;Nathan P. Myhrvold;Clarence T. Tegreene

  • Surgical fastening device with cutter

    Edward S. Boyden;Roderick A. Hyde;Muriel Y. Ishikawa;Eric C. Leuthardt

  • Systems and methods for cooperative collision detection

    Jeffrey A. Bowers;Geoffrey F. Deane;Roderick A. Hyde;Nathan Kundtz

  • Vehicle system for varied compliance benefits

    Roderick A. Hyde;Muriel Y. Ishikawa;Jordin T. Kare;Thomas J. Nugent

  • Supporting antenna assembly configuration network infrastructure

    Roderick A. Hyde;Royce A. Levien;Richard T. Lord;Robert W. Lord

  • Systems and methods for coordinating sensor operation for collision detection

    Jeffrey A. Bowers;Geoffrey F. Deane;Roderick A. Hyde;Nathan Kundtz

  • Network Acquired Behavioral Fingerprint for Authentication

    Marc E. Davis;Matthew G. Dyor;Daniel A. Gerrity;Xuedong Huang

  • Systems, devices, and methods including infection-fighting and monitoring shunts

    Ralph G. Dacey;Roderick A. Hyde;Muriel Y. Ishikawa;Jordin T. Kare

  • Manufacturing control system

    Edward K. Y. Jung;Royce A. Levien;Robert W. Lord;Mark A. Malamud

  • Systems and methods for insurance based upon status of vehicle software

    Jeffrey A. Bowers;Peter L. Hagelstein;Roderick A. Hyde;Muriel Y. Ishikawa

  • Aggregation and retrieval of network sensor data

    Edward K.Y. Jung;Clarence T. Tegreene

  • Computational systems and methods for health services planning and matching

    Shawn P. Firminger;Jason Garms;Roderick A. Hyde;Edward K.Y. Jung

Frequent Co-Authors

Roderick A. Hyde
Roderick A. Hyde Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Victoria Y. H. Wood
Victoria Y. H. Wood Microsoft (United States)
Edward K. Y. Jung
Edward K. Y. Jung Nortel (Canada)
Jordin T. Kare
Jordin T. Kare Microsoft (United States)
Robert W. Lord
Robert W. Lord IBM (United States)
Charles Whitmer
Charles Whitmer Microsoft (United States)
Eric C. Leuthardt
Eric C. Leuthardt Washington University in St. Louis
Mark A. Malamud
Mark A. Malamud Microsoft (United States)
Royce A. Levien
Royce A. Levien Fortress Invention
Richard T. Lord
Richard T. Lord Microsoft (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online degrees can expand your opportunities beyond traditional Computer Science majors. Many students are now considering flexible programs to complement their skills or pivot into new career areas.

For those interested in business and technology leadership, an mba online cheap program allows you to gain management expertise without the high price tag or commute. If you want to upskill quickly, 1 year master's programs online offer an accelerated path to an advanced degree in various fields, including tech-focused options.

Looking for a quick boost to your salary? There are several short careers that pay well, some of which require only a certificate or a fast-tracked degree. In the emerging technology sector, you may also consider degrees in ai to launch or advance a career in artificial intelligence—one of today’s most sought-after fields.

Each of these online options can help you tailor a career path that fits your goals, schedule, and budget.

Best Scientists Citing Clarence T. Tegreene

Trending Scientists