World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
50
Citations
7626
World Ranking
5712
National Ranking
2591

Richard T. Lord publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard T. Lord sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 303 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Richard T. Lord D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard T. Lord sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Computer network
  • Artificial intelligence
  • Electrical engineering

Richard T. Lord mainly investigates World Wide Web, Computer network, Fingerprint, Subject matter and Multimedia. As part of the same scientific family, Richard T. Lord usually focuses on World Wide Web, concentrating on Carry and intersecting with Computer program, Persona, Information flow and Association. His work deals with themes such as Wireless, Telecommunications, End user and Embedded system, which intersect with Computer network.

His Fingerprint study also includes

  • Relation that intertwine with fields like Internet privacy and Information retrieval,
  • Authentication which connect with Server and Network connection. In his research on the topic of Multimedia, Data mining is strongly related with Presentation. His work is dedicated to discovering how Computer security, Function are connected with Human–computer interaction and other disciplines.

His most cited work include:

  • Unmanned device interaction methods and systems (247 citations)
  • Methods, systems, and devices for handling captured image data that is received by devices (156 citations)
  • Speech recognition adaptation systems based on adaptation data (137 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His main research concerns Human–computer interaction, Computer network, Multimedia, World Wide Web and Artificial intelligence. Richard T. Lord has researched Human–computer interaction in several fields, including Fingerprint, User interface, Electronic circuit and Interface. His work in the fields of Communication device overlaps with other areas such as Subject matter.

The various areas that Richard T. Lord examines in his Multimedia study include Modality, Multi modality and Presentation. In general World Wide Web study, his work on Mobile device often relates to the realm of Tablet computer and Facilitation, thereby connecting several areas of interest. His Artificial intelligence study combines topics in areas such as Computer vision and Natural language processing.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Human–computer interaction (18.18%)
  • Computer network (16.36%)
  • Multimedia (14.24%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2013-2017)?

  • Human–computer interaction (18.18%)
  • Computer network (16.36%)
  • World Wide Web (12.12%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His primary areas of investigation include Human–computer interaction, Computer network, World Wide Web, End user and Wearable computer. His Human–computer interaction research incorporates elements of Electronic circuit, Artificial intelligence, Computer vision and Identification. His study looks at the intersection of Electronic circuit and topics like Big data with User interface.

Richard T. Lord merges Computer network with Subject matter in his research. Richard T. Lord performs integrative World Wide Web and Preference research in his work. His Computer security research integrates issues from Provisioning and Implementation.

Between 2013 and 2017, his most popular works were:

  • Devices, methods, and systems for managing representations of entities through use of privacy beacons (60 citations)
  • Indicating observation or visibility patterns in augmented reality systems (50 citations)
  • Cross-reality select, drag, and drop for augmented reality systems (50 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Computer network
  • Artificial intelligence
  • Electrical engineering

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in End user, Computer network, Unit, Rendezvous and Order. His Node study in the realm of Computer network interacts with subjects such as Subject matter. His Unit investigation overlaps with other disciplines such as Computer security and Embedded system.

His Computer security study frequently links to related topics such as Software engineering. His Embedded system study frequently draws connections to adjacent fields such as Selection. While working in this field, Richard T. Lord studies both Rendezvous and Transport engineering.

Best Publications

  • Unmanned device interaction methods and systems

    Royce A. Levien;Richard T. Lord;Robert W. Lord;Mark A. Malamud

  • Methods, systems, and devices for handling captured image data that is received by devices

    Pablos Holman;Roderick A. Hyde;Royce A. Levien;Richard T. Lord

  • Ad-hoc wireless sensor package

    Jesse R. Cheatham;Matthew G. Dyor;Peter N. Glaskowsky;Kimberly D.A. Hallman

  • Enhanced voice conferencing with history

    Richard T. Lord;Robert W. Lord;Nathan P. Myhrvold;Clarence T. Tegreene

  • Unmanned device utilization methods and systems

    Royce A. Levien;Richard T. Lord;Robert W. Lord;Mark A. Malamud

  • Supporting antenna assembly configuration network infrastructure

    Roderick A. Hyde;Royce A. Levien;Richard T. Lord;Robert W. Lord

  • Speech recognition adaptation systems based on adaptation data

    Royce A. Levien;Richard T. Lord;Robert W. Lord;Mark A. Malamud

  • Network Acquired Behavioral Fingerprint for Authentication

    Marc E. Davis;Matthew G. Dyor;Daniel A. Gerrity;Xuedong Huang

  • Computational systems and methods for health services planning and matching

    Shawn P. Firminger;Jason Garms;Roderick A. Hyde;Edward K.Y. Jung

  • Evidence-based healthcare information management protocols

    Roderick A. Hyde;Edward K.Y. Jung;Jordin T. Kare;Eric C. Leuthardt

  • Computational systems and methods for identifying a communications partner

    Marc E. Davis;Matthew G. Dyor;William Gates;Xuedong Huang

  • Presenting auxiliary content in a gesture-based system

    Matthew G. Dyor;Royce A. Levien;Richard T. Lord;Robert W. Lord

  • Determining device identity using a behavioral fingerprint

    Marc E. Davis;Matthew G. Dyor;Daniel A. Gerrity;Xuedong Huang

  • Methods and systems for speech adaptation data

    Royce A. Levien;Richard T. Lord;Robert W. Lord;Mark A. Malamud

  • Base station multi-vehicle coordination

    Royce A. Levien;Robert W. Lord;Richard T. Lord;Mark A. Malamud

  • Methods and systems for managing data and/or services for devices

    Edward K.Y. Jung;Royce A. Levien;Richard T. Lord;Robert W. Lord

  • Unoccupied flying vehicle (UFV) coordination

    Royce A. Levien;Robert W. Lord;Richard T. Lord;Mark A. Malamud

  • Gesture based context menus

    Matthew G. Dyor;Royce A. Levien;Richard T. Lord;Robert W. Lord

  • Relationship Based Trust Verification Schema

    Marc E. Davis;Matthew G. Dyor;Daniel A. Gerrity;Xuedong Huang

  • Trust verification schema based transaction authorization

    Marc E. Davis;Matthew G. Dyor;Daniel A. Gerrity;Xuedong Huang

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert W. Lord
Robert W. Lord IBM (United States)
Mark A. Malamud
Mark A. Malamud Microsoft (United States)
Royce A. Levien
Royce A. Levien Fortress Invention
Clarence T. Tegreene
Clarence T. Tegreene Microsoft (United States)
Roderick A. Hyde
Roderick A. Hyde Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
John D. Rinaldo
John D. Rinaldo SEARETE LLC
Edward K. Y. Jung
Edward K. Y. Jung Nortel (Canada)
Jordin T. Kare
Jordin T. Kare Microsoft (United States)
Eric C. Leuthardt
Eric C. Leuthardt Washington University in St. Louis
Marc Davis
Marc Davis Microsoft (United States)

External Links

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Computer Science opens a world of options when it comes to earning a degree online. For those eager to advance quickly, the quickest online masters degree programs can help you fast-track your education and move into higher-paying roles in less time.

If you’re seeking programs that provide a solid return on investment, consider looking into graduate degrees that are worth it. Many of these in-demand master’s programs lead directly to top tech jobs and satisfy employer requirements.

Starting your journey doesn’t always require a full bachelor’s degree. With an associate degree online, you can gain foundational skills and qualify for many entry-level tech roles in as little as two years.

For budget-minded students, there are plenty of cheap online colleges offering high-quality Computer Science programs, ensuring you get a strong education while minimizing student debt.

Best Scientists Citing Richard T. Lord

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles