World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jeffrey Traer Bernstein

Jeffrey Traer Bernstein

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 36 11314 10991 4667 4468 95 5060

Jeffrey Traer Bernstein publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jeffrey Traer Bernstein between 2008 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jeffrey Traer Bernstein published across 14 years, from 2008 to 2021, averaging 8.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2013. 13 of the 125 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2008 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2013. 2008: 6 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 21 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 5 publications
2008 2021

125 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jeffrey Traer Bernstein: publications per year, 2008 to 2021
Year Publications
2008 6
2009 5
2010 8
2011 6
2012 3
2013 21
2014 11
2015 12
2016 9
2017 8
2018 9
2019 14
2020 8
2021 5
Total 125
Download as CSV

Jeffrey Traer Bernstein publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeffrey Traer Bernstein sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 92–101 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 95 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421 95
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Jeffrey Traer Bernstein D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeffrey Traer Bernstein sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990 36
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Artificial intelligence
  • Computer vision
  • Graphical user interface

Jeffrey Traer Bernstein mainly investigates Graphical user interface, Gesture, Capacitive sensing, Electronic engineering and Acoustics. Graphical user interface is connected with Computer graphics and Focus in his research. A component of his Gesture study involves Computer vision and Artificial intelligence.

His study in the field of Gesture recognition also crosses realms of Controller. His work deals with themes such as Object and Inkwell, which intersect with Capacitive sensing. The concepts of his Acoustics study are interwoven with issues in Pixel, Optoelectronics, Photodiode and Proximity sensor.

His most cited work include:

  • Touch pad with force sensors and actuator feedback (484 citations)
  • Touch and hover sensing (235 citations)
  • Capacitive sensor panel having dynamically reconfigurable sensor size and shape (207 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Jeffrey Traer Bernstein mainly focuses on Artificial intelligence, Graphical user interface, Computer vision, Object and Gesture. Among his Graphical user interface studies, you can observe a synthesis of other disciplines of science such as Movement, Computer graphics, Focus, Intensity and Acoustics. His Acoustics research integrates issues from Capacitive sensing and Intensity.

His Computer vision study which covers Signal that intersects with Control system. He works mostly in the field of Object, limiting it down to topics relating to Computer hardware and, in certain cases, Mechanism. His Gesture research incorporates themes from Mode and Human–computer interaction.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Artificial intelligence (43.43%)
  • Graphical user interface (42.42%)
  • Computer vision (42.42%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2017-2021)?

  • Computer vision (42.42%)
  • Artificial intelligence (43.43%)
  • Graphical user interface (42.42%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His primary scientific interests are in Computer vision, Artificial intelligence, Graphical user interface, Object and Human–computer interaction. Computer vision is represented through his Gesture, Image and Stylus research. Jeffrey Traer Bernstein interconnects Visual feedback and Selection in the investigation of issues within Gesture.

In his papers, Jeffrey Traer Bernstein integrates diverse fields, such as Graphical user interface, Computer graphics, Movement, Home screen, Field of view and Mode. The Graphics research Jeffrey Traer Bernstein does as part of his general Computer graphics study is frequently linked to other disciplines of science, such as Event and Start time, therefore creating a link between diverse domains of science. His Object based study, which is part of a larger body of work in Object, is frequently linked to Surface, bridging the gap between disciplines.

Between 2017 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Devices, methods, and graphical user interfaces for navigating between user interfaces and interacting with control objects (30 citations)
  • Systems, methods, and graphical user interfaces for interacting with augmented and virtual reality environments (22 citations)
  • Devices, methods, and graphical user interfaces for moving user interface objects (6 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Artificial intelligence
  • Graphical user interface
  • Computer vision

Graphical user interface, Movement, Object, Computer graphics and Artificial intelligence are his primary areas of study. His Graphical user interface studies intersect with other subjects such as Power mode, Mode and Computer hardware. His work in Movement tackles topics such as Control which are related to areas like Human–computer interaction.

His study focuses on the intersection of Object and fields such as Representation with connections in the field of Virtual reality, Field of view and Augmented reality. His research on Artificial intelligence often connects related areas such as Computer vision. He performs integrative Gesture and Surface research in his work.

Best Publications

  • Capacitive sensor behind black mask

    Steven Porter Hotelling;Jeffrey Traer Bernstein;David T. Amm;Omar S. Leung

  • Capacitive sensor panel having dynamically reconfigurable sensor size and shape

    Jeffrey Traer Bernstein

  • Display integrated photodiode matrix

    Steve Porter Hotelling;Brian Lynch;Jeffrey Traer Bernstein

  • Thresholds for Determining Feedback in Computing Devices

    Wayne C. Westerman;Duncan Kerr;Avi E. Cieplinski;Jeffrey T. Bernstein

  • Device, Method, and Graphical User Interface for Manipulating Workspace Views

    Julian Missig;Jonathan Koch;Avi E. Cieplinski;B. Michael Victor

  • Intelligent digital assistant in a desktop environment

    Julian K. Missig;Jeffrey Traer Bernstein;Avi E. Cieplinski;May-Li Khoe

  • Device, method, and graphical user interface for transitioning between display states in response to a gesture

    Jeffrey Traer Bernstein;Julian Missig;Avi E. Cieplinski;Matthew I. Brown

  • Device, method, and graphical user interface for displaying additional information in response to a user contact

    Matthew I. Brown;Jeffrey Traer Bernstein;Julian Missig;Avi E. Cieplinski

  • Managing items in a user interface

    Raleigh Joseph Ledet;Jeffrey Traer Bernstein;B. Michael Victor;Avi E. Cieplinksi

  • Touch screen device, method, and graphical user interface for moving on-screen objects without using a cursor

    Jeffrey Traer Bernstein

  • Metadata-Assisted Image Filters

    Bradley D. Ford;Garrett M. Johnson;Cedric Bray;Avi Cieplinski

  • Device, method, and graphical user interface for managing and interacting with concurrently open software applications

    May-Li Khoe;Daniel John Coster;Julian Missig;Jeffrey Traer Bernstein

  • Device, Method, and Graphical User Interface for Displaying Content Associated with a Corresponding Affordance

    Jeffrey Traer Bernstein;May-Li Khoe;Nicholas Zambetti

  • Device, Method, and Graphical User Interface for Facilitating User Interaction with Controls in a User Interface

    Nicholas Zambetti;Jeffrey Traer Bernstein;Avi E. Cieplinski;May-Li Khoe

  • Device, method, and graphical user interface for providing tactile feedback for operations performed in a user interface

    Jeffrey Traer Bernstein;Julian Missig;Avi E. Cieplinski;May-Li Khoe

  • Device, Method, and Graphical User Interface for Manipulating Framed Graphical Objects

    Avi E. Cieplinski;Jeffrey Traer Bernstein;Julian Missig;May-Li Khoe

  • Device, method, and graphical user interface for forgoing generation of tactile output for a multi-contact gesture

    Jeffrey Traer Bernstein;Myra Haggerty;Wayne C. Westerman;Julian K. Missig

  • Device, method, and graphical user interface for providing feedback for changing activation states of a user interface object

    Jeffrey Traer Bernstein;Avi E. Cieplinski;May-Li Khoe;Nicholas Zambetti

  • Device, method, and graphical user interface for selecting user interface objects

    Jeffrey Traer Bernstein;Julian Missig;Avi E. Cieplinski;Matthew I. Brown

  • Device, Method, and Graphical User Interface for Displaying User Interface Objects Corresponding to an Application

    Nicholas Zambetti;Jeffrey Traer Bernstein

Frequent Co-Authors

Duncan Robert Kerr
Duncan Robert Kerr Apple (United States)
Patrick L. Coffman
Patrick L. Coffman Apple (United States)
Stephen O. Lemay
Stephen O. Lemay Apple (United States)
Nicholas V. King
Nicholas V. King Apple (United States)
Wayne Carl Westerman
Wayne Carl Westerman Apple (United States)
Imran Chaudhri
Imran Chaudhri Humane Inc.
Jonathan P. Ive
Jonathan P. Ive Royal College of Art
Bas Ording
Bas Ording Apple (United States)
Steven Porter Hotelling
Steven Porter Hotelling Apple (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Computer Science opens up many educational pathways, from foundational certificates to advanced degrees. One common question for students is what masters program should I do to align with their career goals. Choosing a relevant and in-demand master’s program can make a huge difference in future job prospects.

If you’re looking to quickly enter the workforce, there are now 1 year associate degree programs online that offer a fast track to in-demand tech roles. These programs are ideal for students seeking practical skills in a shorter timeframe.

Affordability is another key concern. For those on a budget, it’s important to research the cheapest online college options available while maintaining quality. These schools offer flexible and cost-effective programs tailored to a variety of student needs.

Finally, students with a lower academic record can still pursue advanced studies. Many online graduate schools with low gpa requirements offer a second chance to prove your abilities and start a rewarding career in computer science.

Best Scientists Citing Jeffrey Traer Bernstein

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles