World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Richard J. Goodyear

Richard J. Goodyear

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
48
Citations
7823
World Ranking
6232
National Ranking
497

Richard J. Goodyear publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard J. Goodyear sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 78 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Richard J. Goodyear D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard J. Goodyear sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Richard J. Goodyear is affiliated with the University of Sussex in the United Kingdom and specializes in neuroscience research, with a focus on sensory systems. Their scholarly work concentrates on auditory biology, particularly related to hearing mechanisms, cochlea function, tinnitus, and genetic factors affecting hearing.

The main fields of study associated with their publications include:

  • Neuroscience

Their subfields of study span:

  • Sensory Systems
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Neurology
  • Microbiology
  • Otorhinolaryngology

The core topics covered in their research are:

  • Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
  • Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
  • Vestibular and auditory disorders
  • Antimicrobial Peptides and Activities
  • Ear Surgery and Otitis Media
  • Immune Response and Inflammation
  • Marine animal studies overview

Richard J. Goodyear has contributed to a range of peer-reviewed publications. Their most recent papers include:

  • "Age-related changes in the biophysical and morphological characteristics of mouse cochlear outer hair cells," 2020, The Journal of Physiology
  • "Identification of a series of hair-cell MET channel blockers that protect against aminoglycoside-induced ototoxicity," 2021, JCI Insight
  • "MET currents and otoacoustic emissions from mice with a detached tectorial membrane indicate the extracellular matrix regulates Ca2+ near stereocilia," 2021, The Journal of Physiology
  • "AAV-mediated rescue of Eps8 expression in vivo restores hair-cell function in a mouse model of recessive deafness," 2022, Molecular Therapy - Methods & Clinical Development
  • "Visualizing Collagen Fibrils in the Cochlea's Tectorial and Basilar Membranes Using a Fluorescently Labeled Collagen-Binding Protein Fragment," 2023, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology

Their frequent publication venues include:

  • The Journal of Physiology
  • JCI Insight
  • Molecular Therapy - Methods & Clinical Development
  • Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology
  • Nature Neuroscience

Richard J. Goodyear collaborates regularly with several co-authors, including:

  • Guy P. Richardson
  • Jing-Yi Jeng
  • Stuart L. Johnson
  • Adam J. Carlton
  • Walter Marcotti

Best Publications

  • A targeted deletion in alpha-tectorin reveals that the tectorial membrane is required for the gain and timing of cochlear feedback.

    P.Kevin Legan;Victoria A. Lukashkina;Richard J. Goodyear;Manfred Kössl

  • The Tip-Link Antigen, a Protein Associated with the Transduction Complex of Sensory Hair Cells, Is Protocadherin-15

    Zubair M. Ahmed;Richard Goodyear;Saima Riazuddin;Ayala Lagziel

  • Hearing loss and retarded cochlear development in mice lacking type 2 iodothyronine deiodinase

    Lily Ng;Richard J. Goodyear;Chad A. Woods;Mark J. Schneider

  • Development and properties of stereociliary link types in hair cells of the mouse cochlea.

    Richard J Goodyear;Walter Marcotti;Corné J Kros;Guy P Richardson

  • The Very Large G-Protein-Coupled Receptor VLGR1: A Component of the Ankle Link Complex Required for the Normal Development of Auditory Hair Bundles

    JoAnn McGee;Richard J. Goodyear;D. Randy McMillan;Eric A. Stauffer

  • Otoancorin, an inner ear protein restricted to the interface between the apical surface of sensory epithelia and their overlying acellular gels, is defective in autosomal recessive deafness DFNB22.

    Ingrid Zwaenepoel;Mirna Mustapha;Michel Leibovici;Elisabeth Verpy

  • Actin-Bundling Protein TRIOBP Forms Resilient Rootlets of Hair Cell Stereocilia Essential for Hearing

    Shin Ichiro Kitajiri;Takeshi Sakamoto;Inna A. Belyantseva;Richard J. Goodyear

  • Myosin XVa and whirlin, two deafness gene products required for hair bundle growth, are located at the stereocilia tips and interact directly

    Benjamin Delprat;Vincent Michel;Richard Goodyear;Yasuhiro Yamasaki

  • Cell-Cell Contact Area Affects Notch Signaling and Notch-Dependent Patterning

    Oren Shaya;Udi Binshtok;Micha Hersch;Micha Hersch;Dmitri Rivkin

  • Sharpened cochlear tuning in a mouse with a genetically modified tectorial membrane.

    Ian J Russell;P Kevin Legan;Victoria A Lukashkina;Andrei N Lukashkin

  • Retardation of cochlear maturation and impaired hair cell function caused by deletion of all known thyroid hormone receptors.

    Alfons Rüsch;Lily Ng;Richard Goodyear;Dominik Oliver

  • Stereocilin-deficient mice reveal the origin of cochlear waveform distortions

    Elisabeth Verpy;Dominique Weil;Michel Leibovici;Richard J. Goodyear

  • Cadherin 23 is a component of the transient lateral links in the developing hair bundles of cochlear sensory cells.

    Vincent Michel;Richard J. Goodyear;Dominique Weil;Walter Marcotti

  • Extracellular matrices associated with the apical surfaces of sensory epithelia in the inner ear: molecular and structural diversity.

    Richard J Goodyear;Guy P Richardson

  • A Receptor-Like Inositol Lipid Phosphatase Is Required for the Maturation of Developing Cochlear Hair Bundles

    R. J. Goodyear;P. K. Legan;M. B. Wright;W. Marcotti

  • Stereocilin connects outer hair cell stereocilia to one another and to the tectorial membrane

    Elisabeth Verpy;Michel Leibovici;Nicolas Michalski;Richard J. Goodyear

  • A deafness mutation isolates a second role for the tectorial membrane in hearing

    P Kevin Legan;Victoria A Lukashkina;Richard J Goodyear;Andrei N Lukashkin

  • Pattern Formation in the Basilar Papilla: Evidence for Cell Rearrangement

    Richard Goodyear;Guy Richardson

  • Sensory organ development in the inner ear: molecular and cellular mechanisms.

    Jane Bryant;Richard J Goodyear;Guy P Richardson

  • Mutations in Protocadherin 15 and Cadherin 23 Affect Tip Links and Mechanotransduction in Mammalian Sensory Hair Cells

    Kumar N. Alagramam;Richard J. Goodyear;Ruishuang Geng;David N. Furness

  • Carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 16 interacts with α-tectorin and is mutated in autosomal dominant hearing loss (DFNA4)

    Jing Zheng;Katharine K. Miller;Tao Yang;Tao Yang;Michael S. Hildebrand

  • The Ankle-Link Antigen: an Epitope Sensitive to Calcium Chelation Associated with the Hair-Cell Surface and the Calycal Processes of Photoreceptors

    Richard Goodyear;Guy Richardson

Frequent Co-Authors

Guy P. Richardson
Guy P. Richardson University of Sussex
Corné J. Kros
Corné J. Kros University of Sussex
Walter Marcotti
Walter Marcotti University of Sheffield
Ian J. Russell
Ian J. Russell University of Brighton
Christine Petit
Christine Petit Université Paris Cité
Peter Dallos
Peter Dallos Northwestern University
Paul Avan
Paul Avan University of Clermont Auvergne
David N. Furness
David N. Furness Keele University
Andrew Forge
Andrew Forge University College London
Dominique Weil
Dominique Weil Institut Pasteur

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Richard J. Goodyear

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles