World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
50
Citations
8514
World Ranking
5777
National Ranking
247

Paul Avan publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Avan sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 221 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Paul Avan D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Avan sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paul Avan is affiliated with the University of Clermont Auvergne in France. Their research primarily falls within the field of Neuroscience, with a focus on Sensory Systems, Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology, Speech and Hearing, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

The main topics Paul Avan investigates include Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, and Genetics; Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation; Vestibular and Auditory Disorders; Noise Effects and Management; Multisensory Perception and Integration; Neuroscience and Music Perception; and Hearing Impairment and Communication.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Paul Avan are Fabrice Giraudet, Christine Petit, M. Puechmaille, T. Mom, and Amrit Singh-Estivalet.

Paul Avan has published in various academic venues, including Hearing Research, Bulletin de l Académie Nationale de Médecine, EMC - Otorrinolaringología, Ear and Hearing, and Journal of Vestibular Research.

Recent research papers authored or coauthored by Paul Avan include the following:

  • Ultrarare heterozygous pathogenic variants of genes causing dominant forms of early-onset deafness underlie severe presbycusis (2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences)
  • NOS1 mutations cause hypogonadotropic hypogonadism with sensory and cognitive deficits that can be reversed in infantile mice (2022, Science Translational Medicine)
  • The SNARE protein SNAP-25 is required for normal exocytosis at auditory hair cell ribbon synapses (2022, iScience)
  • Decreased Reemerging Auditory Brainstem Responses Under Ipsilateral Broadband Masking as a Marker of Noise-Induced Cochlear Synaptopathy (2021, Ear and Hearing)
  • Avaliação de Crianças com Indicadores de Risco para Deficiência Auditiva Atendidas em um Serviço de Referência em Triagem Auditiva Neonatal (2020, Distúrbios da Comunicação)

Best Publications

  • Mutations in the gene encoding pejvakin, a newly identified protein of the afferent auditory pathway, cause DFNB59 auditory neuropathy

    Sedigheh Delmaghani;Francisco J del Castillo;Vincent Michel;Michel Leibovici

  • The remarkable cochlear amplifier.

    J. Ashmore;P. Avan;W. E. Brownell;Peter Dallos

  • Hypervulnerability to Sound Exposure through Impaired Adaptive Proliferation of Peroxisomes

    Sedigheh Delmaghani;Sedigheh Delmaghani;Sedigheh Delmaghani;Jean Defourny;Jean Defourny;Jean Defourny;Asadollah Aghaie;Asadollah Aghaie;Asadollah Aghaie;Maryline Beurg

  • Importance of Binaural Hearing

    Paul Avan;Fabrice Giraudet;Béla Büki

  • Stereocilin-deficient mice reveal the origin of cochlear waveform distortions

    Elisabeth Verpy;Dominique Weil;Michel Leibovici;Richard J. Goodyear

  • Non-invasive method and apparatus for monitoring intracranial pressure

    Scott C. Meyerson;Paul Alexandre Avan;Bela Buki

  • Otoferlin acts as a Ca2+ sensor for vesicle fusion and vesicle pool replenishment at auditory hair cell ribbon synapses

    Nicolas Antoine Michalski;Nicolas Antoine Michalski;Nicolas Antoine Michalski;Juan D Goutman;Sarah Marie Auclair;Jacques Boutet de Monvel;Jacques Boutet de Monvel;Jacques Boutet de Monvel

  • Local gene therapy durably restores vestibular function in a mouse model of Usher syndrome type 1G.

    Alice Emptoz;Vincent Michel;Andrea Lelli;Omar Akil

  • Auditory distortions: origins and functions.

    Paul Avan;Béla Büki;Christine Petit

  • Middle ear influence on otoacoustic emissions. I: Noninvasive investigation of the human transmission apparatus and comparison with model results

    Paul Avan;Béla Büki;Bert Maat;Monique Dordain

  • Otoacoustic emissions: a new tool for monitoring intracranial pressure changes through stapes displacements

    B. Büki;P. Avan;J.J. Lemaire;M. Dordain

  • Distorted Odorant Perception: Analysis of a Series of 56 Patients With Parosmia

    Pierre Bonfils;Paul Avan;Patrick Faulcon;David Malinvaud

  • Frequency specificity of human distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

    Paul Avan;Pierre Bonfils

  • Spontaneous and evoked otoacoustic emissions in preterm neonates

    Pierre Bonfils;Martine Francois;Paul Avan;Alain Londero

  • Wavelet analysis of real ear and synthesized click evoked otoacoustic emissions.

    Hp Wit;P Vandijk;P Avan

  • Functional anatomy of auditory brainstem nuclei: application to the anatomical basis of brainstem auditory evoked potentials.

    Bernard Biacabe;Jean Marc Chevallier;Paul Avan;Pierre Bonfils

  • Pejvakin-mediated pexophagy protects auditory hair cells against noise-induced damage.

    Jean Defourny;Alain Aghaie;Isabelle Perfettini;Isabelle Perfettini;Isabelle Perfettini;Paul Avan

  • Quantitative assessment of human cochlear function by evoked otoacoustic emissions.

    P. Avan;P. Bonfils;D. Loth;Ph. Narcy

  • Characteristics of Transient-evoked Otoacoustic Emissions (TEOEs) in Neonates

    Aidan D;Lestang P;Avan P;Bonfils P

  • Genetic dissection of the function of hindbrain axonal commissures.

    Nicolas Renier;Nicolas Renier;Nicolas Renier;Martijn Schonewille;Fabrice Giraudet;Aleksandra Badura

  • Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. Values for clinical use.

    Pierre Bonfils;Paul Avan

Frequent Co-Authors

Christine Petit
Christine Petit Université Paris Cité
Jean-Paul Nguyen
Jean-Paul Nguyen University of Nantes
Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur
Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur Paris-Est Créteil University
James E. Rothman
James E. Rothman Yale University
Richard J. Goodyear
Richard J. Goodyear University of Sussex
Alain Chédotal
Alain Chédotal Institut de la Vision
Guy P. Richardson
Guy P. Richardson University of Sussex
Jean-Luc Puel
Jean-Luc Puel University of Montpellier

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in neuroscience but seeking flexible learning options, several related online degrees can open diverse career pathways. Many professionals blend neuroscience with psychology, counseling, or social work, taking advantage of comprehensive online psyd programs accredited by apa. These programs are ideal for those pursuing licensure as clinical psychologists and seeking a strong foundation in mental health.

If your goal is to work in family therapy or marriage counseling, consider accelerated mft programs that offer fast-track options for earning your qualifications. These programs provide a pathway to specialized roles in mental health with a strong emphasis on relationships and therapy.

For those looking to earn credentials faster, there are numerous accelerated bachelor's degree online accredited programs. These can help you enter the workforce or pursue graduate study in neuroscience or other related fields more quickly.

Finally, if you’re contemplating your undergraduate studies, you may want to explore what bachelors degree should i get for the best career prospects and salary potential. Your choice of degree can have a significant impact on your future opportunities, both in neuroscience and other fields.

Best Scientists Citing Paul Avan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles