World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 48 3048 2794 519 472 271 17799

Frances Griffiths publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Frances Griffiths between 1983 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Frances Griffiths published across 43 years, from 1983 to 2025, averaging 8.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 30 publications in 2015. 32 of the 367 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1983 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 30. Peak 30 publications in 2015. 1983: 1 publication 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 3 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 2 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 4 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 18 publications 2011: 15 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 30 publications 2016: 19 publications 2017: 18 publications 2018: 24 publications 2019: 21 publications 2020: 21 publications 2021: 24 publications 2022: 21 publications 2023: 21 publications 2024: 19 publications 2025: 13 publications
1983 2025

367 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Frances Griffiths: publications per year, 1983 to 2025
Year Publications
1983 1
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 6
1996 3
1997 0
1998 1
1999 1
2000 3
2001 2
2002 1
2003 2
2004 1
2005 4
2006 9
2007 11
2008 13
2009 12
2010 18
2011 15
2012 9
2013 9
2014 15
2015 30
2016 19
2017 18
2018 24
2019 21
2020 21
2021 24
2022 21
2023 21
2024 19
2025 13
Total 367
Download as CSV

Frances Griffiths publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frances Griffiths sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 264–273 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 271 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138 271
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Frances Griffiths D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frances Griffiths sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203 48
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Frances Griffiths is affiliated with the University of Warwick in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Health Professions, with notable contributions to subfields such as General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Emergency Medicine, and Infectious Diseases.

The scientist's work covers a range of main topics, including:

  • Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Emergency and Acute Care Studies
  • Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Healthcare Systems and Reforms

Frances Griffiths has published frequently in several venues, with the highest number of publications appearing in:

  • BMJ Open
  • Digital Health
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • The Lancet Global Health
  • Journal of Medical Ethics

Notable recent papers authored or coauthored by Griffiths include:

  • Impact of the societal response to COVID-19 on access to healthcare for non-COVID-19 health issues in slum communities of Bangladesh, Kenya, Nigeria and Pakistan: results of pre-COVID and COVID-19 lockdown stakeholder engagements, 2020, BMJ Global Health
  • Health workers' perceptions and experiences of using mHealth technologies to deliver primary healthcare services: a qualitative evidence synthesis, 2020, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
  • Exploring patients' and clinicians' experiences of video consultations in primary care: a systematic scoping review, 2020, BJGP Open
  • Analysis of OpenStreetMap Data Quality at Different Stages of a Participatory Mapping Process: Evidence from Slums in Africa and Asia, 2021, ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information
  • Systematic review of educational interventions to improve the menstrual health of young adolescent girls, 2022, BMJ Open

Collaborations play a significant role in their work, with frequent coauthors including:

  • Anne-Marie Slowther
  • Jane Goudge
  • Richard Lilford
  • Caroline Huxley
  • Karin Eli

Best Publications

  • The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) Version 2018 for Information Professionals and Researchers.

    Quan Nha Hong;Sergi Fàbregues;Gillian Bartlett;Felicity Boardman

  • Designing and evaluating complex interventions to improve health care

    Neil C Campbell;Elizabeth Murray;Janet Darbyshire;Jon Emery

  • A scoring system for appraising mixed methods research, and concomitantly appraising qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods primary studies in Mixed Studies Reviews.

    Pierre Pluye;Marie-Pierre Gagnon;Frances Griffiths;Janique Johnson-Lafleur

  • Why Are Health Care Interventions Delivered Over the Internet? A Systematic Review of the Published Literature

    Frances Griffiths;Antje Lindenmeyer;John Powell;Pam Lowe

  • Improving the content validity of the mixed methods appraisal tool: a modified e-Delphi study.

    Quan Nha Hong;Pierre Pluye;Sergi Fàbregues;Gillian Bartlett

  • The impact of patient and public involvement on UK NHS health care: a systematic review

    Carole Mockford;Sophie Staniszewska;Frances Griffiths;Sandra Herron-Marx

  • Health workers’ perceptions and experiences of using mHealth technologies to deliver primary healthcare services: a qualitative evidence synthesis

    Unknown

  • Social networks--the future for health care delivery.

    Frances Griffiths;Jonathan A. K. Cave;Felicity K. Boardman;Justin Ren

  • Mobile phone use among patients and health workers to enhance primary healthcare: A qualitative study in rural South Africa.

    Jocelyn Olivia Todd Anstey Watkins;Jane Goudge;Francesc Xavier Gómez-Olivé;Frances Griffiths

  • Networks for research in primary health care

    Paul Thomas;Frances Griffiths;Joe Kai;Aislinn O'Dwyer

  • A multicentred randomised controlled trial of a primary care-based cognitive behavioural programme for low back pain. The Back Skills Training (BeST) trial

    S E Lamb;R Lall;Z Hansen;E Castelnuovo

  • Internet videoconferencing for patient-clinician consultations in long-term conditions: A review of reviews and applications in line with guidelines and recommendations.

    Agnieszka Ignatowicz;Helen Atherton;Celia Janine Bernstein;Carol Bryce

  • Verbal and non-verbal behavior of doctors and patients in primary care consultations - how this relates to patient enablement.

    Teresa Pawlikowska;Wenjuan Zhang;Frances Griffiths;Jan van Dalen

  • Health workers’ perceptions and experiences of using mHealth technologies to deliver primary healthcare services: a qualitative evidence synthesis

    Willem A Odendaal;Jane Goudge;Frances Griffiths;Mark Tomlinson

  • Experiences of in-patient mental health services: systematic review.

    Sophie Staniszewska;Carole Mockford;Greg Chadburn;Sarah-jane Hannah Fenton

  • The nature of medical evidence and its inherent uncertainty for the clinical consultation: qualitative study.

    Frances Griffiths;Eileen Green;Maria Tsouroufli

  • Complex consultations and the 'edge of chaos'

    Andrew D Innes;Peter D Campion;Frances E Griffiths

  • Evaluating recovery following hip fracture: a qualitative interview study of what is important to patients.

    Frances Griffiths;Victoria Mason;Felicity K. Boardman;Kathryn J. Dennick

  • Women's control and choice regarding HRT.

    Frances Griffiths

  • “Making it All Normal”: The Role of the Internet in Problematic Pregnancy

    Pam K. Lowe;John Powell;Frances Griffiths;Margaret Thorogood

  • Resilience and depression : perspectives from primary care

    Christopher Dowrick;Renata Kokanovic;Kelsey Hegarty;Frances E. Griffiths

Frequent Co-Authors

Margaret Thorogood
Margaret Thorogood University of Warwick
Sarah E Lamb
Sarah E Lamb University of Exeter
Gavin D. Perkins
Gavin D. Perkins University of Warwick
Stavros Petrou
Stavros Petrou University of Oxford
Richard J. Lilford
Richard J. Lilford University of Birmingham
Nigel Stallard
Nigel Stallard University of Warwick
Kelsey Hegarty
Kelsey Hegarty University of Melbourne
Mandy Ryan
Mandy Ryan University of Aberdeen
Shmuel Reis
Shmuel Reis Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Jeffrey Borkan
Jeffrey Borkan Brown University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities online opens doors to flexible and diverse educational opportunities. Many students are turning to options like an online masters in psychology, which offers a cost-effective way to gain advanced knowledge and enter specialized fields such as counseling, clinical research, or human resources.

For those seeking leadership roles in education, fastest edd program online options can accelerate your journey to earning a doctorate. These fast-track programs are ideal for busy professionals eager to advance their careers without a lengthy time commitment.

If you are interested in earning a graduate degree quickly, consider the benefits of an online master's degree that can be completed in as little as one year. This pathway supports faster career advancement and can open doors to roles in policy analysis, communications, or nonprofit management.

Undergraduates can benefit from online accelerated programs that allow students to complete their bachelor’s degree in less time than traditional on-campus options. These programs provide flexible schedules, enabling students to balance work and study while building market-ready skills.

Best Scientists Citing Frances Griffiths

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles