World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
48
Citations
17799
World Ranking
3048
National Ranking
519

Frances Griffiths publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frances Griffiths sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 271 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Frances Griffiths D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frances Griffiths sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Frances Griffiths is affiliated with the University of Warwick in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Health Professions, with notable contributions to subfields such as General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Emergency Medicine, and Infectious Diseases.

The scientist's work covers a range of main topics, including:

  • Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Emergency and Acute Care Studies
  • Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Healthcare Systems and Reforms

Frances Griffiths has published frequently in several venues, with the highest number of publications appearing in:

  • BMJ Open
  • Digital Health
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • The Lancet Global Health
  • Journal of Medical Ethics

Notable recent papers authored or coauthored by Griffiths include:

  • Impact of the societal response to COVID-19 on access to healthcare for non-COVID-19 health issues in slum communities of Bangladesh, Kenya, Nigeria and Pakistan: results of pre-COVID and COVID-19 lockdown stakeholder engagements, 2020, BMJ Global Health
  • Health workers' perceptions and experiences of using mHealth technologies to deliver primary healthcare services: a qualitative evidence synthesis, 2020, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
  • Exploring patients' and clinicians' experiences of video consultations in primary care: a systematic scoping review, 2020, BJGP Open
  • Analysis of OpenStreetMap Data Quality at Different Stages of a Participatory Mapping Process: Evidence from Slums in Africa and Asia, 2021, ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information
  • Systematic review of educational interventions to improve the menstrual health of young adolescent girls, 2022, BMJ Open

Collaborations play a significant role in their work, with frequent coauthors including:

  • Anne-Marie Slowther
  • Jane Goudge
  • Richard Lilford
  • Caroline Huxley
  • Karin Eli

Best Publications

  • The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) Version 2018 for Information Professionals and Researchers.

    Quan Nha Hong;Sergi Fàbregues;Gillian Bartlett;Felicity Boardman

  • Designing and evaluating complex interventions to improve health care

    Neil C Campbell;Elizabeth Murray;Janet Darbyshire;Jon Emery

  • A scoring system for appraising mixed methods research, and concomitantly appraising qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods primary studies in Mixed Studies Reviews.

    Pierre Pluye;Marie-Pierre Gagnon;Frances Griffiths;Janique Johnson-Lafleur

  • Why Are Health Care Interventions Delivered Over the Internet? A Systematic Review of the Published Literature

    Frances Griffiths;Antje Lindenmeyer;John Powell;Pam Lowe

  • Improving the content validity of the mixed methods appraisal tool: a modified e-Delphi study.

    Quan Nha Hong;Pierre Pluye;Sergi Fàbregues;Gillian Bartlett

  • The impact of patient and public involvement on UK NHS health care: a systematic review

    Carole Mockford;Sophie Staniszewska;Frances Griffiths;Sandra Herron-Marx

  • Health workers’ perceptions and experiences of using mHealth technologies to deliver primary healthcare services: a qualitative evidence synthesis

    Unknown

  • Impact of the societal response to COVID-19 on access to healthcare for non-COVID-19 health issues in slum communities of Bangladesh, Kenya, Nigeria and Pakistan: results of pre-COVID and COVID-19 lockdown stakeholder engagements.

    Syed A K Shifat Ahmed;Motunrayo Ajisola;Motunrayo Ajisola;Kehkashan Azeem;Pauline Bakibinga

  • Social networks--the future for health care delivery.

    Frances Griffiths;Jonathan A. K. Cave;Felicity K. Boardman;Justin Ren

  • Mobile phone use among patients and health workers to enhance primary healthcare: A qualitative study in rural South Africa.

    Jocelyn Olivia Todd Anstey Watkins;Jane Goudge;Francesc Xavier Gómez-Olivé;Frances Griffiths

  • Networks for research in primary health care

    Paul Thomas;Frances Griffiths;Joe Kai;Aislinn O'Dwyer

  • A multicentred randomised controlled trial of a primary care-based cognitive behavioural programme for low back pain. The Back Skills Training (BeST) trial

    S E Lamb;R Lall;Z Hansen;E Castelnuovo

  • Internet videoconferencing for patient-clinician consultations in long-term conditions: A review of reviews and applications in line with guidelines and recommendations.

    Agnieszka Ignatowicz;Helen Atherton;Celia Janine Bernstein;Carol Bryce

  • Exploring patients' and clinicians' experiences of video consultations in primary care : a systematic scoping review

    Arun Thiyagarajan;Calum Grant;Frances Griffiths;Helen Atherton

  • Verbal and non-verbal behavior of doctors and patients in primary care consultations - how this relates to patient enablement.

    Teresa Pawlikowska;Wenjuan Zhang;Frances Griffiths;Jan van Dalen

  • Health workers’ perceptions and experiences of using mHealth technologies to deliver primary healthcare services: a qualitative evidence synthesis

    Willem A Odendaal;Jane Goudge;Frances Griffiths;Mark Tomlinson

  • Experiences of in-patient mental health services: systematic review.

    Sophie Staniszewska;Carole Mockford;Greg Chadburn;Sarah-jane Hannah Fenton

  • The nature of medical evidence and its inherent uncertainty for the clinical consultation: qualitative study.

    Frances Griffiths;Eileen Green;Maria Tsouroufli

  • Complex consultations and the 'edge of chaos'

    Andrew D Innes;Peter D Campion;Frances E Griffiths

  • Evaluating recovery following hip fracture: a qualitative interview study of what is important to patients.

    Frances Griffiths;Victoria Mason;Felicity K. Boardman;Kathryn J. Dennick

  • Women's control and choice regarding HRT.

    Frances Griffiths

  • “Making it All Normal”: The Role of the Internet in Problematic Pregnancy

    Pam K. Lowe;John Powell;Frances Griffiths;Margaret Thorogood

  • Resilience and depression : perspectives from primary care

    Christopher Dowrick;Renata Kokanovic;Kelsey Hegarty;Frances E. Griffiths

Frequent Co-Authors

Margaret Thorogood
Margaret Thorogood University of Warwick
Sarah E Lamb
Sarah E Lamb University of Exeter
Gavin D. Perkins
Gavin D. Perkins University of Warwick
Stavros Petrou
Stavros Petrou University of Oxford
Richard J. Lilford
Richard J. Lilford University of Birmingham
Nigel Stallard
Nigel Stallard University of Warwick
Kelsey Hegarty
Kelsey Hegarty University of Melbourne
Mandy Ryan
Mandy Ryan University of Aberdeen
Shmuel Reis
Shmuel Reis Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Jeffrey Borkan
Jeffrey Borkan Brown University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities online opens doors to flexible and diverse educational opportunities. Many students are turning to options like an online masters in psychology, which offers a cost-effective way to gain advanced knowledge and enter specialized fields such as counseling, clinical research, or human resources.

For those seeking leadership roles in education, fastest edd program online options can accelerate your journey to earning a doctorate. These fast-track programs are ideal for busy professionals eager to advance their careers without a lengthy time commitment.

If you are interested in earning a graduate degree quickly, consider the benefits of an online master's degree that can be completed in as little as one year. This pathway supports faster career advancement and can open doors to roles in policy analysis, communications, or nonprofit management.

Undergraduates can benefit from online accelerated programs that allow students to complete their bachelor’s degree in less time than traditional on-campus options. These programs provide flexible schedules, enabling students to balance work and study while building market-ready skills.

Best Scientists Citing Frances Griffiths

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles