World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
36
Citations
5077
World Ranking
11310
National Ranking
4665

Steve Sawyer publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steve Sawyer sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 161 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Steve Sawyer D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steve Sawyer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Steve Sawyer is affiliated with Syracuse University in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the field of Social Sciences, with a focus on Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Marketing, Strategy and Management, and Demography.

The scientist's work concentrates on several main topics, including:

  • Digital Economy and Work Transformation
  • Employment and Welfare Studies
  • Sharing Economy and Platforms
  • Information Systems Theories and Implementation
  • Innovation, Technology, and Society
  • Cyberloafing and Workplace Behavior
  • Personal Information Management and User Behavior

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Steve Sawyer include:

  • Michael Dunn
  • Isabel Muñoz
  • Pyeonghwa Kim
  • Clea O'Neil
  • Mohammad Hossein Jarrahi

Steve Sawyer has published regularly in various academic venues. The most frequent publication outlets are:

  • Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
  • Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie

Among their recent papers are:

  • "Distancing Bonus Or Downscaling Loss? The Changing Livelihood of Us Online Workers in Times of COVID-19" (2020), published in Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie
  • "The effectiveness of trauma-informed wilderness therapy with adolescents: A pilot study." (2020), published in Psychological Trauma Theory Research Practice and Policy
  • "Gender Differences and Lost Flexibility in Online Freelancing During the COVID-19 Pandemic" (2021), published in Frontiers in Sociology
  • "Flexible work and personal digital infrastructures" (2021), published in Communications of the ACM
  • "Platform-mediated Markets, Online Freelance Workers and Deconstructed Identities" (2022), published in Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction

Best Publications

  • Understanding and Communicating Social Informatics: A Framework for Studying and Teaching the Human Contexts of Information and Communication Technologies

    Steve Sawyer;Howard Rosenbaum;Rob Kling

  • Software development: processes and performance

    S. Sawyer;P. J. Guinan

  • Social Technologies, Informal Knowledge Practices, and the Enterprise

    Mohammad Hossein Jarrahi;Steve Sawyer

  • Packaged software: implications of the differences from custom approaches to software development

    S. Sawyer

  • A market-based perspective on information systems development

    Steve Sawyer

  • Platformic Management, Boundary Resources for Gig Work, and Worker Autonomy

    Mohammad Hossein Jarrahi;Will Sutherland;Sarah Beth Nelson;Steve Sawyer

  • Broadband and mobile opportunities: A socio-technical perspective

    Steve Sawyer;Jonathan P. Allen;Heejin Lee

  • Social Informatics in the Information Sciences: Current Activities and Emerging Directions

    Steve Sawyer;Howard Rosenbaum

  • Social informatics: Perspectives, examples, and trends

    Steve Sawyer;Kristin R. Eschenfelder

  • Packaged software development teams: What makes them different?

    Erran Carmel;Steven B Sawyer

  • Surfing the Next Wave: Design and Implementation Challenges of Ubiquitous Computing

    Kalle Lyytinen;Youngjin Yoo;Upkar Varshney;Mark S. Ackerman

  • Effects of intra‐group conflict on packaged software development team performance

    Steve Sawyer

  • Sociotechnical Approaches to the Study of Information Systems

    Steve Sawyer;Mohammad Hossein Jarrahi

  • Investigating the interplay between structure and information and communications technology in the real estate industry

    Kevin G Crowston;Steven B Sawyer;Rolf Wigand

  • Social interactions of information systems development teams: a performance perspective

    Steve Sawyer;Patricia J. Guinan;Jay G. Cooprider

  • Software development teams

    Steve Sawyer

  • Social informatics: Overview, principles and opportunities

    Steve Sawyer

  • Temporal Issues in Information and Communication Technology-Enabled Organizational Change: Evidence From an Enterprise Systems Implementation

    Steve Sawyer;Richard Southwick

  • The Sociotechnical Nature of Mobile Computing Work: Evidence from a Study of Policing in the United State

    Steve Sawyer;Andrea H. Tapia

  • The effective use of automated application development tools

    P. J. Guinan;J. G. Cooprider;S. Sawyer

  • Mobility and the first responder

    Steve Sawyer;Andrea Tapia;Leonard Pesheck;John Davenport

Frequent Co-Authors

Kevin Crowston
Kevin Crowston Syracuse University
Rolf T. Wigand
Rolf T. Wigand Arizona State University
M. Lynne Markus
M. Lynne Markus Bentley University
Charles R. McClure
Charles R. McClure Florida State University
Rob Kling
Rob Kling Indiana University
Robert D. Galliers
Robert D. Galliers Bentley University
Kenneth L. Kraemer
Kenneth L. Kraemer University of California, Irvine
Kalle Lyytinen
Kalle Lyytinen Case Western Reserve University
Michael Lynch
Michael Lynch Cornell University
Brian S. Butler
Brian S. Butler University of Maryland, College Park

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring your options in computer science isn’t limited to traditional degrees. Today, online education offers flexible and affordable solutions for a variety of career goals and backgrounds. Whether you’re just starting out or looking to advance, there are multiple pathways to consider.

For students seeking a foundation in the field, pursuing an associate's degree online can be a smart and cost-effective first step. These programs can prepare you for entry-level roles or further study without the time and expense of a four-year degree.

Cost is often a concern, but with the rise of cheapest online degrees, you can find high-quality programs that fit your budget. Many institutions provide financial aid and flexible schedules, making it easier to balance studies with work or family commitments.

For those interested in career advancement, exploring the most worthwhile masters degrees can open doors to specialized roles in software engineering, cybersecurity, or data science. Even students with previous academic challenges can benefit, as there are online schools that accept low gpa.

Best Scientists Citing Steve Sawyer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles