World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Business and Management

D-Index
51
Citations
20092
World Ranking
906
National Ranking
393

Paul M. Leonardi publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul M. Leonardi sits on this spectrum.

35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientists 435 publications: 1 scientists 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35 publications 436+

This scientist: 142 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

Paul M. Leonardi D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul M. Leonardi sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paul M. Leonardi is affiliated with the University of California, Santa Barbara in the United States. Their research focuses primarily on topics within Business, Management and Accounting, Social Sciences, and Psychology, with significant work specifically in Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Strategy and Management, Management Information Systems, and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management.

The main topics covered in their research include:

  • Technostress in Professional Settings
  • Team Dynamics and Performance
  • Cyberloafing and Workplace Behavior
  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Big Data and Business Intelligence
  • Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management

Paul M. Leonardi has authored several recent papers, among which are:

  • COVID-19 and the New Technologies of Organizing: Digital Exhaust, Digital Footprints, and Artificial Intelligence in the Wake of Remote Work (2020), published in Journal of Management Studies
  • How Remote Work Changes the World of Work (2023), published in Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Academy of Management Proceedings (5 publications)
  • Journal of Management Studies
  • Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior
  • Strategic Organization
  • Journal of Communication

Paul M. Leonardi frequently collaborates with several researchers, including:

  • Camille G. Endacott
  • William C. Barley
  • Sienna Helena S. Parker
  • Roni Shen
  • Jeffrey W. Treem

This profile provides an overview of Paul M. Leonardi's interdisciplinary approach, connecting technology, organizational behavior, and psychology through their diverse publication record and collaboration network.

Best Publications

  • When flexible routines meet flexible technologies: affordance, constraint, and the imbrication of human and material agencies

    Paul M. Leonardi

  • Social Media Use in Organizations: Exploring the Affordances of Visibility, Editability, Persistence, and Association

    Jeffrey W. Treem;Paul M. Leonardi

  • Enterprise Social Media: Definition, History, and Prospects for the Study of Social Technologies in Organizations

    Paul M. Leonardi;Marleen Huysman;Charles Steinfield

  • Materiality and change: Challenges to building better theory about technology and organizing

    Paul M. Leonardi;Stephen R. Barley

  • What’s Under Construction Here? Social Action, Materiality, and Power in Constructivist Studies of Technology and Organizing

    Paul M. Leonardi;Stephen R. Barley

  • Social Media, Knowledge Sharing, and Innovation: Toward a Theory of Communication Visibility

    Paul M. Leonardi

  • Theoretical foundations for the study of sociomateriality

    Paul M. Leonardi

  • Social Media and Their Affordances for Organizing: A Review and Agenda for Research

    Paul M. Leonardi;Emmanuelle Vaast

  • Materiality and Organizing: Social Interaction in a Technological World

    Paul M. Leonardi;Bonnie A. Nardi;Jannis Kallinikos

  • When does technology use enable network change in organizations? a comparative study of feature use and shared affordances

    Paul M. Leonardi

  • Ambient awareness and knowledge acquisition: using social media to learn Who knows what and Who knows whom

    Paul M. Leonardi

  • Digital materiality? How artifacts without matter, matter

    Paul M. Leonardi

  • Transformational technologies and the creation of new work practices: making implicit knowledge explicit in task-based offshoring

    Paul M. Leonardi;Diane E. Bailey

  • The Lure of the Virtual

    Diane E. Bailey;Paul M. Leonardi;Stephen R. Barley

  • Materiality, Sociomateriality, and Socio-Technical Systems: What Do These Terms Mean? How are They Related? Do We Need Them?

    Paul M. Leonardi

  • Activating the Informational Capabilities of Information Technology for Organizational Change

    Paul M. Leonardi

  • Innovation Blindness: Culture, Frames, and Cross-Boundary Problem Construction in the Development of New Technology Concepts

    Paul M. Leonardi

  • Social Media as Social Lubricant: How Ambient Awareness Eases Knowledge Transfer

    Paul M. Leonardi;Samantha R. Meyer

  • The Connectivity Paradox: Using Technology to Both Decrease and Increase Perceptions of Distance in Distributed Work Arrangements

    Paul M. Leonardi;Jeffrey W. Treem;Michele H. Jackson

  • The social media revolution

    Paul M. Leonardi

  • Behavioral Visibility: A new paradigm for organization studies in the age of digitization, digitalization, and datafication:

    Paul M. Leonardi;Jeffrey W. Treem

Frequent Co-Authors

Noshir Contractor
Noshir Contractor Northwestern University
Bonnie Nardi
Bonnie Nardi University of California, Irvine
Stephen R. Barley
Stephen R. Barley Stanford University
Michael Stohl
Michael Stohl University of California, Santa Barbara
Cynthia Stohl
Cynthia Stohl University of California, Santa Barbara
Amer Diwan
Amer Diwan Google (United States)
Elizabeth M. Gerber
Elizabeth M. Gerber Northwestern University
Charles Steinfield
Charles Steinfield Michigan State University
Peter R. Monge
Peter R. Monge University of Southern California
Samer Faraj
Samer Faraj McGill University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Business and Management opens up a range of career pathways. Many students consider specialized programs to boost employability and professional skills. For example, online accounting degree programs are popular for those interested in finance, taxation, or audit roles. These flexible programs are ideal for working professionals seeking practical credentials.

The rise of digital business also makes technology-focused degrees attractive. A growing number of professionals are now pursuing ai degrees to gain expertise in automation, data analysis, and machine learning—key skills that are transforming the business landscape.

If you are interested in leadership roles in building and infrastructure, the cost of a specialty program is important. For those considering project oversight or site management, learning more about construction management degree cost can help you make informed, budget-conscious decisions.

Many business leaders also choose to advance their careers with an online executive mba. These degrees offer advanced management training and networking opportunities while allowing you to balance work and study.

Best Scientists Citing Paul M. Leonardi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles