World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Business and Management 56 677 624 299 270 230 29296
Computer Science 51 5196 5053 2385 2304 203 27365

Ann Majchrzak publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ann Majchrzak between 1980 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ann Majchrzak published across 46 years, from 1980 to 2025, averaging 5.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 25 publications in 2014. 6 of the 267 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1980 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 25. Peak 25 publications in 2014. 1980: 1 publication 1981: 0 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 7 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 9 publications 1987: 3 publications 1988: 7 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 5 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 3 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 2 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 25 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 20 publications 2021: 18 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 1 publication
1980 2025

267 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ann Majchrzak: publications per year, 1980 to 2025
Year Publications
1980 1
1981 0
1982 2
1983 1
1984 7
1985 0
1986 9
1987 3
1988 7
1989 1
1990 5
1991 3
1992 2
1993 2
1994 0
1995 1
1996 3
1997 5
1998 1
1999 2
2000 4
2001 4
2002 6
2003 6
2004 9
2005 6
2006 5
2007 11
2008 6
2009 7
2010 6
2011 3
2012 11
2013 6
2014 25
2015 7
2016 5
2017 10
2018 6
2019 9
2020 20
2021 18
2022 9
2023 7
2024 5
2025 1
Total 267
Download as CSV

Ann Majchrzak publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ann Majchrzak sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 230–234 publications, is where this scientist sits. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

This scientist: 230 publications — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66
65–69 52
70–74 80
75–79 83
80–84 116
85–89 94
90–94 111
95–99 122
100–104 104
105–109 113
110–114 96
115–119 97
120–124 112
125–129 93
130–134 79
135–139 69
140–144 80
145–149 81
150–154 85
155–159 50
160–164 74
165–169 61
170–174 40
175–179 44
180–184 47
185–189 59
190–194 35
195–199 37
200–204 49
205–209 48
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37
225–229 34
230–234 25 230
235–239 28
240–244 34
245–249 28
250–254 23
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16
270–274 23
275–279 12
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100
Download as CSV

Ann Majchrzak D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ann Majchrzak sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 156
31 159
32 171
33 161
34 135
35 124
36 114
37 111
38 103
39 89
40 81
41 97
42 80
43 69
44 68
45 63
46 54
47 69
48 50
49 58
50 54
51 62
52 54
53 43
54 49
55 35
56 40 56
57 44
58 34
59 29
60 48
61 32
62 30
63 22
64 22
65 19
66 20
67 18
68 17
69 21
70 20
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13
77 19
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7
83 7
84 6
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6
89+ 96
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2012 - Fellow of the Association for Information Systems (AIS)

Overview

Ann Majchrzak is affiliated with the University of Southern California in the United States. Their research spans across the social sciences and computer science fields, with a significant focus on computer science applications, communication, sociology and political science, strategy and management, and social psychology.

Their scholarly output includes work published predominantly in venues such as the Academy of Management Proceedings, Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, MIS Quarterly, Organization Science, and the Journal of Knowledge Management.

Majchrzak's main topics of work explore areas including open source software innovations, knowledge management and sharing, team dynamics and performance, innovation and knowledge management, digital marketing and social media, mobile crowdsensing and crowdsourcing, and ethics and social impacts of artificial intelligence.

Frequent co-authors include Arvind Malhotra, Yao Sun, Michael A. Zaggl, Terri L. Griffith, and Marlon Twyman.

Some recent papers authored or co-authored by Ann Majchrzak include:

  • "Machines augmenting entrepreneurs: Opportunities (and threats) at the Nexus of artificial intelligence and entrepreneurship" (2022, Journal of Business Venturing)
  • "Avoiding an Oppressive Future of Machine Learning: A Design Theory for Emancipatory assistants" (2021, MIS Quarterly)
  • "Socio-Technical Affordances for Large-Scale Collaborations: Introduction to a Virtual Special Issue" (2021, Organization Science)
  • "How Open Crowds Self-Organize" (2020, Academy of Management Discoveries)
  • "Pro-socially motivated interaction for knowledge integration in crowd-based open innovation" (2020, Journal of Knowledge Management)

Majchrzak has received recognition including the Fellow of the Association for Information Systems (AIS) award in 2012.

Best Publications

  • Organizing for Innovation in the Digitized World

    Youngjin Yoo;Richard J. Boland;Kalle Lyytinen;Ann Majchrzak

  • Digital innovation management: reinventing innovation management research in a digital world

    Satish Nambisan;Kalle Lyytinen;Ann Majchrzak;Michael Song

  • A design theory for systems that support emergent knowledge processes

    M. Lynne Markus;Ann Majchrzak;Les Gasser

  • Information Technology and the Changing Fabric of Organization

    Raymond F. Zammuto;Terri L. Griffith;Ann Majchrzak;Deborah J. Dougherty

  • Knowledge Collaboration in Online Communities

    Samer Faraj;Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa;Ann Majchrzak

  • Technology adaption: the case of a computer-supported inter-organizational virtual team 1

    Ann Majchrzak;Ronald E. Rice;Arvind Malhotra;Nelson King

  • The Contradictory Influence of Social Media Affordances on Online Communal Knowledge Sharing

    Ann Majchrzak;Samer Faraj;Gerald C. Kane;Bijan Azad

  • The open innovation research landscape: established perspectives and emerging themes across different levels of analysis

    Marcel Bogers;Ann Kristin Zobel;Allan Afuah;Esteve Almirall

  • Technology Adaptation: The Case of a Computer-Supported Inter-Organizational Virtual Team

    Ann Majchrzak;Ronald E. Rice;Arvind Malhotra;Nelson King

  • Leading Virtual Teams

    Arvind Malhotra;Ann Majchrzak;Benson Rosen

  • Methods for Policy Research: Taking Socially Responsible Action

    Ann Majchrzak;M. Lynne Markus

  • Coordinating Expertise Among Emergent Groups Responding to Disasters

    Ann Majchrzak;Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa;Andrea B. Hollingshead

  • Knowledge Reuse for Innovation

    Ann Majchrzak;Lynne P. Cooper;Olivia E. Neece

  • Designing for digital transformation: lessons for information systems research from the study of ICT and societal challenges

    Ann Majchrzak;M. Lynne Markus;Jonathan Wareham

  • Radical innovation without collocation: a case study at Boeing-Rocketdyne

    Arvind Malhotra;Ann Majchrzak;Robert Carman;Vern Lott

  • Towards an Information Systems Perspective and Research Agenda on Crowdsourcing for Innovation

    Unknown

  • Corporate wiki users: results of a survey

    Ann Majchrzak;Christian Wagner;Dave Yates

  • The Human Side of Factory Automation: Managerial and Human Resource Strategies for Making Automation Succeed

    Ann Majchrzak

  • Enabling Customer-Centricity Using Wikis and the Wiki Way

    Christian Wagner;Ann Majchrzak

  • Transcending Knowledge Differences in Cross-Functional Teams

    Ann Majchrzak;Philip H. B. More;Samer Faraj

  • Perceived Individual Collaboration Know-How Development Through Information Technology--Enabled Contextualization: Evidence from Distributed Teams

    Ann Majchrzak;Arvind Malhotra;Richard John

Frequent Co-Authors

Arvind Malhotra
Arvind Malhotra University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa
Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa The University of Texas at Austin
M. Lynne Markus
M. Lynne Markus Bentley University
Samer Faraj
Samer Faraj McGill University
Les Gasser
Les Gasser University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Richard J. Boland
Richard J. Boland Case Western Reserve University
Kalle Lyytinen
Kalle Lyytinen Case Western Reserve University
Gerald C. Kane
Gerald C. Kane Boston College
Marcel Bogers
Marcel Bogers Eindhoven University of Technology
Ronald E. Rice
Ronald E. Rice University of California, Santa Barbara

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Business and Management studies in the USA opens doors to diverse online degree options and career pathways. Many students interested in flexible, reputable programs explore nationally accredited online colleges, which provide quality education fitting various career goals.

For those seeking leadership roles, consider affordable doctoral programs in leadership. These programs are ideal for advancing to executive or academic positions and often feature online flexibility for working professionals.

Business students may also find promising prospects in specialized fields. For example, the construction industry offers high-demand roles, and construction management colleges provide accelerated online degrees that help candidates quickly enter this dynamic sector.

Likewise, healthcare continues to grow as a leading career choice. Those wanting to move into healthcare leadership may benefit from an online degree for healthcare administration, designed for rapid skill-building and professional advancement.

Exploring these related online degrees helps maximize career options and tailor your studies to match changing workforce needs.

Best Scientists Citing Ann Majchrzak

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles