World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 47 3440 3168 242 231 296 7630

Elizabeth Beattie publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Elizabeth Beattie between 1996 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Elizabeth Beattie published across 30 years, from 1996 to 2025, averaging 10.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 29 publications in 2013. 16 of the 324 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 29. Peak 29 publications in 2013. 1996: 2 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 2 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 4 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 14 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 23 publications 2013: 29 publications 2014: 22 publications 2015: 24 publications 2016: 23 publications 2017: 26 publications 2018: 18 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 17 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 14 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 8 publications
1996 2025

324 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Elizabeth Beattie: publications per year, 1996 to 2025
Year Publications
1996 2
1997 1
1998 0
1999 1
2000 1
2001 2
2002 2
2003 3
2004 5
2005 1
2006 4
2007 9
2008 12
2009 14
2010 7
2011 12
2012 23
2013 29
2014 22
2015 24
2016 23
2017 26
2018 18
2019 16
2020 17
2021 13
2022 14
2023 7
2024 8
2025 8
Total 324
Download as CSV

Elizabeth Beattie publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elizabeth Beattie sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 294–303 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 296 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106 296
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Elizabeth Beattie D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elizabeth Beattie sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251 47
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Elizabeth Beattie is affiliated with the Queensland University of Technology in Australia. Their research primarily spans the fields of Health Professions and Medicine, with a significant focus on General Health Professions and Psychiatry and Mental Health.

Their work is notably concentrated on topics such as Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes, Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research, Frailty in Older Adults, Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders, Mental Health and Patient Involvement, Aging and Gerontology Research, and Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving.

Elizabeth Beattie has contributed to multiple research publications, often collaborating with frequent co-authors including Nancy A. Pachana, Margaret MacAndrew, Jacki Liddle, Claire O'Connor, and Gerard J. Byrne.

Their recent papers include the following:

  • Enjoyable, engaging and individualised: A concept analysis of meaningful activity for older adults with dementia (2020), published in International Journal of Older People Nursing
  • How Important Are Choice, Autonomy, and Relationships in Predicting the Quality of Life of Nursing Home Residents? (2021), published in Journal of Applied Gerontology
  • Early Implementation and Evaluation of StepUp for Dementia Research: An Australia-Wide Dementia Research Participation and Public Engagement Platform (2021), published in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • Co-designing a dashboard of predictive analytics and decision support to drive care quality and client outcomes in aged care: a mixed-method study protocol (2021), published in BMJ Open
  • Non-pharmacological interventions for neuropsychiatric symptoms of dementia in residential aged care settings: An umbrella review (2022), published in International Journal of Nursing Studies

Their work has appeared in various publication venues, with frequent contributions to:

  • International Psychogeriatrics
  • Collegian Journal of the Royal College of Nursing Australia
  • BMC Geriatrics
  • Dementia
  • International Journal of Older People Nursing

Best Publications

  • Need-driven dementia-compromised behavior: An alternative view of disruptive behavior

    Donna L. Algase;Cormelia Beck;Ann Kolanowski;Ann Whall

  • Exploring the effect of companion robots on emotional expression in older adults with dementia: A pilot randomized controlled trial

    Wendy Moyle;Marie Louise Cooke;Elizabeth Ruby Anne Beattie;Cindy Jingwen Jones

  • Use of a Robotic Seal as a Therapeutic Tool to Improve Dementia Symptoms: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial

    Wendy Moyle;Cindy J. Jones;Jenny E. Murfield;Lukman Thalib

  • A Systematic Review of Interventions to Change Staff Care Practices in Order to Improve Resident Outcomes in Nursing Homes

    Lee-Fay Low;Jennifer Fletcher;Belinda J Goodenough;Belinda J Goodenough;Yun-Hee Jeon

  • A survey-based study of knowledge of Alzheimer’s disease among health care staff

    Wendy Smyth;Elaine Fielding;Elizabeth Beattie;Anne Gardner;Anne Gardner

  • Clinical practice guidelines for dementia in Australia

    Kate Laver;Robert G Cumming;Suzanne M Dyer;Meera R Agar

  • Literature review: use of respite by carers of people with dementia

    Christine Neville;Elizabeth Beattie;Elaine Fielding;Margaret MacAndrew

  • The Algase wandering scale: Initial psychometrics of a new caregiver reporting tool:

    Donna L. Algase;Elizabeth R. A. Beattie;Erna-Lynne Bogue;Lan Yao

  • ‘I always look under the bed for a man’. Needs and barriers to the expression of sexuality in residential aged care: the views of residents with and without dementia

    Michael Bauer;Deirdre Fetherstonhaugh;Laura Tarzia;Rhonda Nay

  • Assistive technologies for people with dementia: ethical considerations.

    Belinda Bennett;Fiona McDonald;Elizabeth Beattie;Terry Carney

  • EVIDENCE SUPPORTING NUTRITIONAL INTERVENTIONS FOR PERSONS IN EARLY STAGE ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE (AD)

    S. C. Burgener;Linda L. Buettner;K. Coen Buckwalter;E. Beattie

  • Wandering and the Physical Environment

    Donna L. Algase;Elizabeth R. A. Beattie;Cathy Antonakos;Cynthia A. Beel-Bates

  • Cognitive training for early-stage Alzheimer's disease and dementia.

    Fang Yu;Karen M Rose;Sandra C Burgener;Cindy Cunningham

  • Estimates of stability of daily wandering behavior among cognitively impaired long-term care residents

    Donna L. Algase;Barbara Kupferschmid;Cynthia A. Beel-bates;Elizabeth R.a. Beattie

  • Negative health outcomes and adverse events in older people attending emergency departments: A systematic review

    Linda Schnitker;Melinda Martin-Khan;Elizabeth Beattie;Len Gray

  • Influencers on quality of life as reported by people living with dementia in long-term care: a descriptive exploratory approach

    Wendy Moyle;Deirdre Fetherstonhaugh;Melissa Greben;Elizabeth Beattie

  • Biomechanical activity devices to index wandering behavior in dementia.

    Donna L. Algase;Elizabeth R. A. Beattie;Sara A. Leitsch;Cynthia A. Beel-Bates

  • Foot massage versus quiet presence on agitation and mood in people with dementia: A randomised controlled trial

    Wendy Moyle;Wendy Moyle;Marie Louise Cooke;Elizabeth Beattie;David H.K. Shum

  • Using a therapeutic companion robot for dementia symptoms in long-term care: reflections from a cluster-RCT.

    Wendy Moyle;Cindy Jones;Jenny Murfield;Lukman Thalib

  • Effectiveness of meaningful occupation interventions for people living with dementia in residential aged care: A systematic review

    Catherine Travers;Deborah Brooks;Sonia Hines;Maria O'Reilly

  • The cost-effectiveness of using PARO, a therapeutic robotic seal, to reduce agitation and medication use in dementia: findings from a cluster–randomized controlled trial

    Merehau C. Mervin;Wendy Moyle;Cindy Jones;Jenny Murfield

  • Exploring the effect of companion robots on emotional expression in older people with dementia : a pilot randomized controlled trial

    Wendy Moyle;Marie L. Cooke;Elizabeth Beattie;Cindy Jones

Frequent Co-Authors

Nancy A. Pachana
Nancy A. Pachana University of Queensland
Brian Draper
Brian Draper University of New South Wales
David Shum
David Shum Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Geoffrey Mitchell
Geoffrey Mitchell University of Queensland
Henry Brodaty
Henry Brodaty University of New South Wales
Yun-Hee Jeon
Yun-Hee Jeon University of Sydney
Lee-Fay Low
Lee-Fay Low University of Sydney
Kaarin J. Anstey
Kaarin J. Anstey University of New South Wales
Patricia M. Davidson
Patricia M. Davidson Johns Hopkins University
Lindy Clemson
Lindy Clemson University of Sydney

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities opens up diverse online degree options catering to different career goals and timelines. Many prospective students are concerned about cost, especially for advanced study. If you're considering a graduate program in psychology, you may be wondering how much does a masters in psychology cost. Tuition varies widely by school and format, so researching affordable options is key.

For those seeking the fastest academic routes, there are shortest online edd programs that let you quickly gain credentials in educational leadership. Similarly, if you want to accelerate your career change or advancement, consider one year masters programs online. These provide intensive learning, allowing you to earn a master’s degree in just 12 months.

Adult learners may also benefit from accelerated bachelor's degree programs for adults. These programs recognize prior experience and offer flexible, condensed scheduling, making it easier to balance education with work or family responsibilities.

Best Scientists Citing Elizabeth Beattie

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles