World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
49
Citations
11180
World Ranking
2917
National Ranking
207

Geoffrey Mitchell publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Geoffrey Mitchell sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 451 publications — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Geoffrey Mitchell D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Geoffrey Mitchell sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Geoffrey Mitchell is affiliated with the University of Queensland in Australia and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, with a focus on health professions. Their research spans a variety of subfields including public health, environmental and occupational health, general health professions, pediatrics, perinatology and child health, radiological and ultrasound technology, and psychiatry and mental health.

Their work covers several main topics of interest. Key areas include palliative care and end-of-life issues, childhood cancer survivors' quality of life, patient dignity and privacy, family and patient care in intensive care units, geriatric care and nursing homes, primary care and health outcomes, as well as chronic disease management strategies.

Mitchell has published numerous papers in prominent academic journals. Selected recent publications include:

  • Targeting cancer testis antigens in synovial sarcoma, 2021, Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
  • A systematic review of the effectiveness of sleep hygiene in children with ADHD, 2020, Psychology Health & Medicine
  • Using illness trajectories to inform person centred, advance care planning, 2024, BMJ
  • Cost-Effectiveness of Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring in People With a Family History of Coronary Disease, 2021, JACC. Cardiovascular Imaging
  • Whole-person care in general practice: The nature of whole-person care, 2020, Australian Journal of General Practice

Frequent co-authors in their collaborative research include:

  • Patsy Yates
  • Claire E. Johnson
  • Tony Stanton
  • Andrew Tonkin
  • Gerald F. Watts

Mitchell's research is regularly published in key venues, reflecting their interdisciplinary approach across clinical and health sciences. The frequent publication venues include:

  • Health & Social Care in the Community
  • BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care
  • Palliative Medicine
  • Australian Journal of General Practice
  • Collegian Journal of the Royal College of Nursing Australia

Over the course of their career, Mitchell has contributed over 100 publications in the field of medicine and over 30 in health professions, with a particular emphasis on improving patient care through multidisciplinary approaches. Their research integrates clinical insights with health service delivery, aiming to address complex health issues such as palliative care, chronic disease management, and quality of life in vulnerable populations.

Best Publications

  • The Single-Case Reporting Guideline In BEhavioural Interventions (SCRIBE) 2016 Statement†

    Robyn L. Tate;Michael Perdices;Ulrike Rosenkoetter;William Shadish

  • The expanding role of primary care in cancer control

    Greg Rubin;Annette Berendsen;S Michael Crawford;Rachel Dommett

  • Information giving and decision-making in patients with advanced cancer : A systematic review

    Christine M. Gaston;Geoffrey Mitchell

  • Clinical practice guidelines for communicating prognosis and end-of-life issues with adults in the advanced stages of a life-limiting illness, and their caregivers

    Josephine M. Clayton;Karen M. Hancock;Phyllis N. Butow;Martin H.N. Tattersall

  • Interventions that can reduce inappropriate prescribing in the elderly: a systematic review.

    Sukhpreet Kaur;Geoffrey Mitchell;Luis Vitetta;Michael S. Roberts

  • Barriers for conducting clinical trials in developing countries- a systematic review

    Chalachew Alemayehu;Geoffrey Mitchell;Jane Nikles

  • Prevalence and characteristics of patients with advanced chronic conditions in need of palliative care in the general population: A cross-sectional study:

    Xavier Gómez-Batiste;Marisa Martínez-Muñoz;Carles Blay;Jordi Amblàs

  • How well do general practitioners deliver palliative care? A systematic review

    Geoffrey K Mitchell

  • Doctors as patients: a systematic review of doctors' health access and the barriers they experience.

    Margaret Kay;Geoffrey Mitchell;Alexandra Clavarino;Jennifer Doust

  • Effectiveness of current treatment approaches for benzodiazepine discontinuation: a meta-analysis.

    Jannette M. Parr;David J. Kavanagh;Lareina Cahill;Geoffrey Mitchell

  • Palliative care from diagnosis to death

    Scott Murray;Marilyn Kendall;Geoffrey K. Mitchell;Sebastien Moine

  • Palliative pharmacological sedation for terminally ill adults.

    Elaine M Beller;Mieke L van Driel;Leanne McGregor;Shani Truong

  • Prevalence and risk factors of sarcopenia among adults living in nursing homes

    Hugh E. Senior;Tim R. Henwood;Elaine M. Beller;Geoffrey K. Mitchell

  • Difficult but necessary conversations--the case for advance care planning.

    Ian A Scott;Geoffrey K Mitchell;Elizabeth J Reymond;Michael P Daly

  • Multidisciplinary care planning and teamwork in primary care.

    Geoffrey K Mitchell;Jennifer J Tieman;Tania M Shelby-James

  • Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: are we helping or harming?

    Rae Thomas;Geoffrey K. Mitchell;Laura Batstra

  • Promoting palliative care in the community: Production of the primary palliative care toolkit by the European Association of Palliative Care Taskforce in primary palliative care

    Scott A Murray;Adam Firth;Nils Schneider;Bart Van den Eynden

  • Systematic review of integrated models of health care delivered at the primary-secondary interface: how effective is it and what determines effectiveness?

    Geoffrey K. Mitchell;Letitia Burridge;Jianzhen Zhang;Maria Donald

  • The retrospective diagnosis of a second outbreak of equine morbillivirus infection.

    P T Hooper;A R Gould;G M Russell;J A Kattenbelt

  • Doctors do not adequately look after their own physical health.

    Margaret P Kay;Geoffrey K Mitchell;Christopher B Del Mar

Frequent Co-Authors

David C. Currow
David C. Currow Flinders University
Afaf Girgis
Afaf Girgis University of New South Wales
Alexandra Clavarino
Alexandra Clavarino University of Queensland
Nancy A. Pachana
Nancy A. Pachana University of Queensland
Elizabeth Beattie
Elizabeth Beattie Queensland University of Technology
Paul Glasziou
Paul Glasziou Bond University
Robyn L. Tate
Robyn L. Tate University of Sydney
Christopher H. Schmid
Christopher H. Schmid Brown University
Brian Kelly
Brian Kelly University of Newcastle Australia
Patricia M. Davidson
Patricia M. Davidson Johns Hopkins University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students drawn to Social Sciences and Humanities, selecting the right online degree can shape your future career. Many universities in the USA now offer flexible online programs designed for working professionals and those seeking an expedited route into the workforce.

If you seek a dynamic role in social work, you may consider online accelerated msw programs, which allow you to earn your Master of Social Work more quickly than traditional pathways. Psychology is another popular field: accelerated psychology programs enable students to fast-track their education and begin serving communities sooner.

For those interested in counseling, choosing a program with the gold standard of accreditation is crucial. Explore cacrep accredited counseling options to ensure your qualifications are recognized and respected. If working with families appeals to you, an online masters in marriage and family therapy provides a specialized path to a rewarding and impactful career.

These pathways not only open fulfilling professional opportunities—they also offer flexibility and affordability to suit different lifestyles and educational needs.

Best Scientists Citing Geoffrey Mitchell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles