World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
45
Citations
11333
World Ranking
7072
National Ranking
3105

Darren Gergle publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Darren Gergle sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 138 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Darren Gergle D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Darren Gergle sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Darren Gergle is affiliated with Northwestern University in the United States. Their research spans multiple intersecting fields primarily within computer science and psychology.

The main fields of study associated with their work include:

  • Computer Science
  • Psychology

The subfields they explore involve:

  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Social Psychology
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Information Systems
  • Computer Science Applications

The research topics frequently addressed in their publications feature:

  • Team Dynamics and Performance
  • Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
  • Topic Modeling
  • Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
  • Usability and User Interface Design
  • Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Personal Information Management and User Behavior

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored include:

  • "Model Positionality and Computational Reflexivity: Promoting Reflexivity in Data Science" (2022), presented at the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
  • "Co11ab: Augmenting Accessibility in Synchronous Collaborative Writing for People with Vision Impairments" (2022), presented at the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
  • "Design and Evaluation of Accessible Collaborative Writing Techniques for People with Vision Impairments" (2022), published in ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
  • "Sensitive Sharing on Social Media: Exploring Willingness to Disclose PrEP Usage Among Adolescent Males Who Have Sex With Males" (2020), published in Social Media + Society
  • "Opportunistic Collective Experiences" (2021), published in Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction

Frequent co-authors include:

  • Kapil Garg
  • Anne Marie Piper
  • Haoqi Zhang
  • Scott Allen Cambo
  • Maitraye Das

The prominent publication venues for Gergle's work are:

  • Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
  • CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
  • Social Media + Society

Best Publications

  • The aligned rank transform for nonparametric factorial analyses using only anova procedures

    Jacob O. Wobbrock;Leah Findlater;Darren Gergle;James J. Higgins

  • Harnessing Context Sensing to Develop a Mobile Intervention for Depression

    Michelle Nicole Burns;Mark Begale;Jennifer Duffecy;Darren Gergle

  • Effects of four computer-mediated communications channels on trust development

    Nathan Bos;Judy Olson;Darren Gergle;Gary Olson

  • Usability for the Web: Designing Web Sites that Work

    Tom Brinck;Darren Gergle;Scott D. Wood

  • Emotion rating from short blog texts

    Alastair J. Gill;Darren Gergle;Robert M. French;Jon Oberlander

  • The use of visual information in shared visual spaces: informing the development of virtual co-presence

    Robert E. Kraut;Darren Gergle;Susan R. Fussell

  • On the "localness" of user-generated content

    Brent J. Hecht;Darren Gergle

  • "Algorithms ruin everything": #RIPTwitter, Folk Theories, and Resistance to Algorithmic Change in Social Media

    Michael A. DeVito;Darren Gergle;Jeremy Birnholtz

  • Physically large displays improve performance on spatial tasks

    Desney S. Tan;Darren Gergle;Peter Scupelli;Randy Pausch

  • With similar visual angles, larger displays improve spatial performance

    Desney S. Tan;Darren Gergle;Peter Scupelli;Randy Pausch

  • The tower of Babel meets web 2.0: user-generated content and its applications in a multilingual context

    Brent Hecht;Darren Gergle

  • Simplifying cyber foraging for mobile devices

    Rajesh Krishna Balan;Darren Gergle;Mahadev Satyanarayanan;James Herbsleb

  • Using Visual Information for Grounding and Awareness in Collaborative Tasks

    Darren Gergle;Robert E. Kraut;Susan R. Fussell

  • Language Efficiency and Visual Technology Minimizing Collaborative Effort with Visual Information

    Darren Gergle;Robert E. Kraut;Susan R. Fussell

  • Addressing Age-Related Bias in Sentiment Analysis.

    Mark Díaz;Isaac Johnson;Amanda Lazar;Anne Marie Piper

  • Action as language in a shared visual space

    Darren Gergle;Robert E. Kraut;Susan R. Fussell

  • Hot Off the Wiki Structures and Dynamics of Wikipedia’s Coverage of Breaking News Events

    Brian Keegan;Darren Gergle;Noshir Contractor

  • Physically large displays improve path integration in 3D virtual navigation tasks

    Desney S. Tan;Darren Gergle;Peter G. Scupelli;Randy Pausch

  • Omnipedia: bridging the wikipedia language gap

    Patti Bao;Brent Hecht;Samuel Carton;Mahmood Quaderi

  • Measuring self-focus bias in community-maintained knowledge repositories

    Brent Hecht;Darren Gergle

Frequent Co-Authors

Brent Hecht
Brent Hecht Northwestern University
Robert E. Kraut
Robert E. Kraut Carnegie Mellon University
Elizabeth M. Gerber
Elizabeth M. Gerber Northwestern University
Susan R. Fussell
Susan R. Fussell Cornell University
Desney S. Tan
Desney S. Tan Microsoft (United States)
Noshir Contractor
Noshir Contractor Northwestern University
Meredith Ringel Morris
Meredith Ringel Morris Google (United States)
Jon Oberlander
Jon Oberlander University of Edinburgh
Jeremy Birnholtz
Jeremy Birnholtz Northwestern University
Pierre Dillenbourg
Pierre Dillenbourg École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens the doors to a wide range of online degrees and career options. Whether you’re looking for fast-track education or specialized expertise, there are several key pathways to consider.

If you wish to start your career quickly, the quickest associates degree programs can provide a solid technical foundation in as little as two years. For those committed to leadership roles in education or academia, pursuing an ed d degree online might align best with your goals.

It’s critical to choose a provider with strong academic standards. Selecting one of the highly accredited online universities ensures your degree will be recognized and valued by employers and advanced programs.

Interested in creative tech careers? Consider a game design masters online to focus on cutting-edge game development. With so many options available, online learning provides flexibility and a pathway to diverse and dynamic careers in technology.

Best Scientists Citing Darren Gergle

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles