World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Meredith Ringel Morris

Meredith Ringel Morris

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
80
Citations
22709
World Ranking
1096
National Ranking
586

Meredith Ringel Morris publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Meredith Ringel Morris sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 246 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Meredith Ringel Morris D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Meredith Ringel Morris sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2020 - ACM Fellow For contributions to human-computer interaction, information retrieval, computer-supported cooperative work, and accessibility
  • 2017 - ACM Distinguished Member
  • 2012 - ACM Senior Member

Overview

Meredith Ringel Morris is a researcher affiliated with Google in the United States. Their work primarily focuses on computer science, with significant contributions in artificial intelligence, human-computer interaction, and information systems. The researcher has produced a substantial body of work, publishing 46 papers in computer science and its subfields.

Their research covers various key topics including:

  • Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing
  • Topic Modeling
  • Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Expert Finding and Q&A Systems
  • Speech and Dialogue Systems
  • Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Wikis in Education and Collaboration

Publications from Meredith Ringel Morris have appeared in multiple venues, often reflecting the interdisciplinary nature of their work. Frequent publication venues include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
  • ACM SIGACCESS Accessibility and Computing
  • Communications of the ACM
  • Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction

Some of their recent papers are:

  • "LaMDA: Language Models for Dialog Applications," 2022, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behavior," 2023, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Toward fairness in AI for people with disabilities SBG@a research roadmap," 2020, ACM SIGACCESS Accessibility and Computing
  • "AI and accessibility," 2020, Communications of the ACM
  • "Factors Affecting Response Quantity, Quality, and Speed for Questions Asked Via Social Network Status Messages," 2021, Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media

The researcher has collaborated frequently with several co-authors across their projects. Notable co-authors include Jaime Teevan, Shanqing Cai, Katrin Tomanek, Ajit Narayanan, and Michael P. Brenner.

Meredith Ringel Morris has received recognition from the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), including being named an ACM Fellow in 2020 for contributions to human-computer interaction, information retrieval, computer-supported cooperative work, and accessibility. Earlier distinctions include ACM Distinguished Member in 2017 and ACM Senior Member in 2012.

Best Publications

  • User-defined gestures for surface computing

    Jacob O. Wobbrock;Meredith Ringel Morris;Andrew D. Wilson

  • Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behavior

    Unknown

  • What do people ask their social networks, and why?: a survey study of status message q&a behavior

    Meredith Ringel Morris;Jaime Teevan;Katrina Panovich

  • Tweeting is believing?: understanding microblog credibility perceptions

    Meredith Ringel Morris;Scott Counts;Asta Roseway;Aaron Hoff

  • SearchTogether: an interface for collaborative web search

    Meredith Ringel Morris;Eric Horvitz

  • From internet access to internet skills: digital inequality among older adults

    Eszter Hargittai;Anne Marie Piper;Meredith Ringel Morris

  • DiamondSpin: an extensible toolkit for around-the-table interaction

    Chia Shen;Frédéric D. Vernier;Clifton Forlines;Meredith Ringel

  • SIDES: a cooperative tabletop computer game for social skills development

    Anne Marie Piper;Eileen O'Brien;Meredith Ringel Morris;Terry Winograd

  • #TwitterSearch: a comparison of microblog search and web search

    Jaime Teevan;Daniel Ramage;Merredith Ringel Morris

  • What do you see when you're surfing?: using eye tracking to predict salient regions of web pages

    Georg Buscher;Edward Cutrell;Meredith Ringel Morris

  • Cooperative gestures: multi-user gestural interactions for co-located groupware

    Meredith Ringel Morris;Anqi Huang;Andreas Paepcke;Terry Winograd

  • Sign Language Recognition, Generation, and Translation: An Interdisciplinary Perspective

    Danielle Bragg;Oscar Koller;Mary Bellard;Larwan Berke

  • A survey of collaborative web search practices

    Meredith Ringel Morris

  • Seeking and sharing health information online: comparing search engines and social media

    Munmun De Choudhury;Meredith Ringel Morris;Ryen W. White

  • CoSearch: a system for co-located collaborative web search

    Saleema Amershi;Meredith Ringel Morris

  • iStuff: a physical user interface toolkit for ubiquitous computing environments

    Rafael Ballagas;Meredith Ringel;Maureen Stone;Jan Borchers

  • Understanding users' preferences for surface gestures

    Meredith Ringel Morris;Jacob O. Wobbrock;Andrew D. Wilson

  • Visual challenges in the everyday lives of blind people

    Erin Brady;Meredith Ringel Morris;Yu Zhong;Samuel White

  • Exploring the effects of group size and table size on interactions with tabletop shared-display groupware

    Kathy Ryall;Clifton Forlines;Chia Shen;Meredith Ringel Morris

  • A Comparison of Information Seeking Using Search Engines and Social Networks

    Meredith Ringel Morris;Jaime Teevan;Katrina Panovich

  • Sign Language Recognition, Generation, and Translation: An Interdisciplinary Perspective

    Danielle Bragg;Oscar Koller;Mary Bellard;Larwan Berke

Frequent Co-Authors

Edward Cutrell
Edward Cutrell Microsoft (United States)
Jaime Teevan
Jaime Teevan Microsoft (United States)
Chia Shen
Chia Shen Harvard University
Jeffrey P. Bigham
Jeffrey P. Bigham Carnegie Mellon University
Clifton Forlines
Clifton Forlines Draper Labs
Shaun K. Kane
Shaun K. Kane Google (United States)
Andrew D. Wilson
Andrew D. Wilson Microsoft (United States)
Terry Winograd
Terry Winograd Stanford University
Jacob O. Wobbrock
Jacob O. Wobbrock University of Washington
Gene Golovchinsky
Gene Golovchinsky FX Palo Alto Laboratory

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens up a range of flexible online education options and career pathways. For those seeking quick entry into tech careers, there are 3-month certificate programs that pay well. These programs can equip you with job-ready skills and credentials in a short timespan, ideal for those wanting to kickstart their careers fast.

If you’re looking to advance your knowledge with a graduate degree but have limited time, the shortest masters degree programs can help you earn your qualification in as little as one year. Additionally, focusing on the most worthwhile masters degrees can further boost your job prospects, as these specialty fields are highly sought-after by employers in technology and related industries.

For students who prefer a quicker or more affordable route, 1 year associate degree programs online provide foundational training for entry-level jobs or further academic progression. With so many flexible online options, you can tailor your education journey to your personal goals, schedule, and career ambitions.

Best Scientists Citing Meredith Ringel Morris

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles