World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Clifton Forlines

Clifton Forlines

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
47
Citations
9211
World Ranking
6475
National Ranking
2876

Clifton Forlines publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Clifton Forlines sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 137 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Clifton Forlines D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Clifton Forlines sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Clifton Forlines is affiliated with Draper Labs in the United States. Their research contribution includes work in the domain of cognitive load assessment using advanced machine learning techniques and physiological sensing data.

They have recently published a paper titled Cognitive Load Assessment Using Feature-Wise Attention-Based Compact Cnn and Subject-Agnostic Meta-Learning Through Low-Cost Physiological Sensing in 2024 in the SSRN Electronic Journal.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Clifton Forlines include:

  • Ghanahshyam B. Kshirsagar
  • Saiph Savage

Their work has appeared in the following publication venue:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Best Publications

  • iLamps: geometrically aware and self-configuring projectors

    Ramesh Raskar;Jeroen van Baar;Paul Beardsley;Thomas Willwacher

  • Direct-touch vs. mouse input for tabletop displays

    Clifton Forlines;Daniel Wigdor;Chia Shen;Ravin Balakrishnan

  • DiamondSpin: an extensible toolkit for around-the-table interaction

    Chia Shen;Frédéric D. Vernier;Clifton Forlines;Meredith Ringel

  • Lucid touch: a see-through mobile device

    Daniel Wigdor;Clifton Forlines;Patrick Baudisch;John Barnwell

  • Method for recognizing hand gesture

    Clifton Lloyd Forlines;Kathleen Ryall;Chia Shen;Michael Chi Hung Wu

  • Gesture registration, relaxation, and reuse for multi-point direct-touch surfaces

    M. Wu;Chia Shen;K. Ryall;C. Forlines

  • Combining and measuring the benefits of bimanual pen and direct-touch interaction on horizontal interfaces

    Peter Brandl;Clifton Forlines;Daniel Wigdor;Michael Haller

  • Exploring the effects of group size and table size on interactions with tabletop shared-display groupware

    Kathy Ryall;Clifton Forlines;Chia Shen;Meredith Ringel Morris

  • Beyond "social protocols": multi-user coordination policies for co-located groupware

    Meredith Ringel Morris;Kathy Ryall;Chia Shen;Clifton Forlines

  • Multi-user interaction using handheld projectors

    Xiang Cao;Clifton Forlines;Ravin Balakrishnan

  • Antialiasing for automultiscopic 3D displays

    Matthias Zwicker;Wojciech Matusik;Frédo Durand;Hanspeter Pfister

  • Sharing and building digital group histories

    Chia Shen;Neal B. Lesh;Frederic Vernier;Clifton Forlines

  • Method for manipulating touch-sensitive graphical user interface and touch-sensitive graphical user interface

    Clifton L Forlines;Mark S Hancock;Chia Shen;Frederic D Vernier

  • WeSpace: the design development and deployment of a walk-up and share multi-surface visual collaboration system

    Daniel Wigdor;Hao Jiang;Clifton Forlines;Michelle Borkin

  • Experiences with and observations of direct-touch tabletops

    K. Ryall;M.R. Morris;K. Everitt;C. Forlines

  • Method and system for presenting image set

    Alan W Esenther;Clifton L Forlines;Thomas R Lanning;Kent B Wittenburg

  • Interaction using a handheld projector

    P. Beardsley;J. van Baar;R. Raskar;C. Forlines

  • Multimodal multiplayer tabletop gaming

    Edward Tse;Saul Greenberg;Chia Shen;Clifton Forlines

  • HybridPointing: fluid switching between absolute and relative pointing with a direct input device

    Clifton Forlines;Daniel Vogel;Ravin Balakrishnan

  • GRAPHIC MULTI-USER INTERFACE FOR SOLVING CONTENTION AND METHOD FOR SOLVING CONTENTION OF GRAPHIC MULTIUSER INTERFACE

    Ringel Meredith J;Ryall Kathleen;Shen Chia;Forlines Clifton Lloyd

Frequent Co-Authors

Chia Shen
Chia Shen Harvard University
Ravin Balakrishnan
Ravin Balakrishnan University of Toronto
Paul Beardsley
Paul Beardsley Weta Digital
Meredith Ringel Morris
Meredith Ringel Morris Google (United States)
Saul Greenberg
Saul Greenberg University of Calgary
Karan Singh
Karan Singh University of Toronto
Hanspeter Pfister
Hanspeter Pfister Harvard University
Paul Henry Dietz
Paul Henry Dietz Misapplied Sciences, Inc.

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science doesn’t have to follow a traditional path. Many students consider online degrees for flexibility and affordability. For those wanting a quick start, options like an associate degree in 6 months online can help you gain foundational skills and enter the tech workforce in less than a year.

Cost is an important factor in any education decision. If you’re pursuing advanced credentials, choosing a cheap doctorate degree online can help reduce student debt and open doors to university teaching or research roles.

For educators in technology fields, online edd programs offer a fast-track to leadership and administrative positions. These programs make it easier for professionals to advance their careers without taking time away from work.

Tech skills also pair well with business. An online business degree can complement your Computer Science expertise, preparing you for management or entrepreneurial roles in the IT sector.

Best Scientists Citing Clifton Forlines

Trending Scientists