World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 86 14019 13200 7112 6584 274 30337

Philip W. Shaul publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Philip W. Shaul between 1984 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Philip W. Shaul published across 43 years, from 1984 to 2026, averaging 6.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 1999. 7 of the 282 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1984 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 1999. 1984: 2 publications 1985: 5 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 5 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 6 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 9 publications 1997: 8 publications 1998: 9 publications 1999: 14 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 11 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 12 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 6 publications 2026: 1 publication
1984 2026

282 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Philip W. Shaul: publications per year, 1984 to 2026
Year Publications
1984 2
1985 5
1986 3
1987 4
1988 0
1989 5
1990 3
1991 4
1992 4
1993 6
1994 6
1995 3
1996 9
1997 8
1998 9
1999 14
2000 8
2001 4
2002 11
2003 9
2004 1
2005 11
2006 9
2007 10
2008 4
2009 6
2010 4
2011 11
2012 4
2013 10
2014 10
2015 7
2016 10
2017 11
2018 6
2019 9
2020 7
2021 8
2022 4
2023 12
2024 4
2025 6
2026 1
Total 282
Download as CSV

Philip W. Shaul publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip W. Shaul sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 261–280 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 274 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722 274
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Philip W. Shaul D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip W. Shaul sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 86–87 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 86 D-Index — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960 86
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians

Overview

Philip W. Shaul is affiliated with The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with significant contributions to subfields including Molecular Biology, Epidemiology, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Surgery, and Immunology.

Their academic output covers various topics, notably:

  • Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism
  • Estrogen and related hormone effects
  • Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
  • Atherosclerosis and Cardiovascular Diseases
  • Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism
  • Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension

Among their recent publications are:

  • Mitochondrial substrate utilization regulates cardiomyocyte cell-cycle progression (2020, Nature Metabolism)
  • Resveratrol intervention attenuates chylomicron secretion via repressing intestinal FXR-induced expression of scavenger receptor SR-B1 (2023, Nature Communications)
  • Macrophage-to-endothelial cell crosstalk by the cholesterol metabolite 27HC promotes atherosclerosis in male mice (2023, Nature Communications)
  • Identification of scavenger receptor B1 as the airway microfold cell receptor for Mycobacterium tuberculosis (2020, eLife)
  • Genetic or therapeutic neutralization of ALK1 reduces LDL transcytosis and atherosclerosis in mice (2023, Nature Cardiovascular Research)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Philip W. Shaul include:

  • Chieko Mineo (29 publications)
  • Anastasia Sacharidou (10 publications)
  • Ling Guo (8 publications)
  • Xiang-An Li (8 publications)
  • Linzhang Huang (7 publications)

Their work appears regularly in well-regarded scientific journals such as:

  • Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology (8 publications)
  • Nature Communications (3 publications)
  • Nature Cardiovascular Research (2 publications)
  • Cancers (2 publications)
  • Molecular Metabolism (2 publications)

Philip W. Shaul has also been recognized as a member of the Association of American Physicians, reflecting their engagement with professional medical organizations.

Best Publications

  • HDL Cholesterol Efflux Capacity and Incident Cardiovascular Events

    Anand K Rohatgi;Amit Khera;Jarett D Berry;Edward G. Givens

  • Estrogen receptor α mediates the nongenomic activation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase by estrogen

    Zhong Chen;Ivan S. Yuhanna;Zoya Galcheva-Gargova;Richard H. Karas

  • Demonstration That C-Reactive Protein Decreases eNOS Expression and Bioactivity in Human Aortic Endothelial Cells

    Senthil Kumar Venugopal;Sridevi Devaraj;Ivan Yuhanna;Philip Shaul

  • Inhaled Nitric Oxide and Persistent Pulmonary Hypertension of the Newborn

    Jesse D. Roberts;Jeffrey R. Fineman;Frederick C. Morin;Philip W. Shaul

  • Acylation Targets Endothelial Nitric-oxide Synthase to Plasmalemmal Caveolae

    Philip W. Shaul;Eric J. Smart;Lisa J. Robinson;Zohre German

  • High-density lipoprotein binding to scavenger receptor-BI activates endothelial nitric oxide synthase

    Ivan S. Yuhanna;Yan Zhu;Blair E. Cox;Lisa D. Hahner

  • Endothelial and Antithrombotic Actions of HDL

    Chieko Mineo;Hiroshi Deguchi;John H. Griffin;Philip W. Shaul

  • Regulation of Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase: Location, Location, Location

    Philip W. Shaul

  • Estrogen modulation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase.

    Ken L. Chambliss;Philip W. Shaul

  • Role of plasmalemmal caveolae in signal transduction

    Philip W. Shaul;Richard G. W. Anderson

  • Abnormal Vascular Function and Hypertension in Mice Deficient in Estrogen Receptor β

    Yan Zhu;Zhao Bian;Ping Lu;Richard H. Karas

  • Estrogen receptor alpha and endothelial nitric oxide synthase are organized into a functional signaling module in caveolae.

    Ken L. Chambliss;Ivan S. Yuhanna;Chieko Mineo;Pingsheng Liu

  • Oxidized Low Density Lipoprotein Displaces Endothelial Nitric-oxide Synthase (eNOS) from Plasmalemmal Caveolae and Impairs eNOS Activation

    Alison Blair;Philip W. Shaul;Ivan S. Yuhanna;Patricia A. Conrad

  • High Density Lipoprotein-induced Endothelial Nitric-oxide Synthase Activation Is Mediated by Akt and MAP Kinases *

    Chieko Mineo;Ivan S. Yuhanna;Michael J. Quon;Philip W. Shaul

  • 27-Hydroxycholesterol is an endogenous SERM that inhibits the cardiovascular effects of estrogen

    Michihisa Umetani;Hideharu Domoto;Andrew K Gormley;Ivan S Yuhanna

  • Estrogen Upregulates Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase Gene Expression in Fetal Pulmonary Artery Endothelium

    Amy N. MacRitchie;Sandy S. Jun;Zhong Chen;Zohre German

  • High Density Lipoprotein Prevents Oxidized Low Density Lipoprotein-induced Inhibition of Endothelial Nitric-oxide Synthase Localization and Activation in Caveolae

    Annette Uittenbogaard;Philip W. Shaul;Ivan S. Yuhanna;Alison Blair

  • Estrogen acutely stimulates nitric oxide synthase activity in fetal pulmonary artery endothelium.

    Regina L. Lantin-Hermoso;Charles R. Rosenfeld;Ivan S. Yuhanna;Zohre German

  • 27-Hydroxycholesterol Is an Endogenous Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulator

    Carolyn D. DuSell;Michihisa Umetani;Philip W. Shaul;David J. Mangelsdorf

  • Plasma Membrane Estrogen Receptors Are Coupled to Endothelial Nitric-oxide Synthase through Gαi

    Myra H. Wyckoff;Ken L. Chambliss;Chieko Mineo;Ivan S. Yuhanna

Frequent Co-Authors

William Oh
William Oh Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
John A. Katzenellenbogen
John A. Katzenellenbogen University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Benita S. Katzenellenbogen
Benita S. Katzenellenbogen University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Joachim Herz
Joachim Herz The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Richard G. W. Anderson
Richard G. W. Anderson The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Jane E. Salmon
Jane E. Salmon Hospital for Special Surgery
Barbara S. Stonestreet
Barbara S. Stonestreet Brown University
L. M. Buja
L. M. Buja The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Eric J. Smart
Eric J. Smart University of Kentucky
Kenneth S. Korach
Kenneth S. Korach National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Medicine doesn't always mean becoming a doctor. Many students consider alternative healthcare roles that can be pursued online. Options include programs focused on healthcare leadership and specialized clinical practice.

For those interested in management, pursuing one of the best online mha programs can lead to roles in hospital administration or healthcare consulting. Finding a quality education without a hefty price tag is also important—some of the cheapest online mha programs offer excellent value and strong career outcomes.

If advanced nursing is your goal, the least expensive dnp programs prepare students for leadership in clinical settings and advanced patient care. For aspiring pharmacists, a 3 year online pharmd is a fast-track option to entering the evolving world of pharmacy practice.

Choosing the right online degree pathway depends on your interests, career goals, and financial considerations. Explore all your options to find a program that meets your unique needs and ambitions in the healthcare field.

Best Scientists Citing Philip W. Shaul

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles