World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Barbara S. Stonestreet

Barbara S. Stonestreet

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
42
Citations
6231
World Ranking
7693
National Ranking
3300

Barbara S. Stonestreet publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Barbara S. Stonestreet sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 234 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Barbara S. Stonestreet D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Barbara S. Stonestreet sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Barbara S. Stonestreet is affiliated with Brown University in the United States and has a significant body of research primarily within the field of Medicine. Their scholarly work spans across several subfields including Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Neurology, Molecular Biology, and Immunology. This diverse set of specialties reflects a multidisciplinary approach to medical research.

The primary focus of their research relates to neonatal and fetal brain pathology, with 40 publications addressing this subject. Additional key research topics include neonatal respiratory health, traumatic brain injury and neurovascular disturbances, neuroscience of respiration and sleep, anesthesia and neurotoxicity, neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration mechanisms, and mitochondrial function and pathology. These areas highlight a strong interest in developmental and acute brain conditions, as well as respiratory and neurobiological interactions.

Among their recent papers, several contributions stand out in respected scientific venues:

  • Hypoxic-ischemic-related cerebrovascular changes and potential therapeutic strategies in the neonatal brain (2020, Journal of Neuroscience Research)
  • Lipopolysaccharide-induced changes in the neurovascular unit in the preterm fetal sheep brain (2020, Journal of Neuroinflammation)
  • Exogenous inter-α inhibitor proteins prevent cell death and improve ischemic stroke outcomes in mice (2021, Journal of Clinical Investigation)
  • Novel Neuroprotective Agents to Treat Neonatal Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy: Inter-Alpha Inhibitor Proteins (2020, International Journal of Molecular Sciences)
  • Brain organoids for hypoxic-ischemic studies: from bench to bedside (2023, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences)

Their research has been published predominantly in the International Journal of Molecular Sciences, with five publications. Other frequent publication venues include Experimental Neurology and Neurotherapeutics, each with three papers, as well as Journal of Perinatology and Journal of Neuroscience Research.

Barbara S. Stonestreet collaborates regularly with a network of coauthors including Xiaodi Chen, Yow-Pin Lim, Clémence Disdier, Richard Tucker, and Joseph Qiu. This indicates active engagement with multiple researchers contributing to their fields of study.

Best Publications

  • Validity of Doppler Measurements of Anterior Cerebral Artery Blood Flow Velocity: Correlation with Brain Blood Flow in Piglets

    Nancy B. Hansen;Barbara S. Stonestreet;Ted S. Rosenkrantz;William Oh

  • Hemodynamic Effects of Delayed Cord Clamping in Premature Infants

    Ross Sommers;Barbara S. Stonestreet;William Oh;Abbot Laptook

  • Ontogeny of blood-brain barrier function in ovine fetuses, lambs, and adults

    B. S. Stonestreet;C. S. Patlak;K. D. Pettigrew;C. B. Reilly

  • The Effects of Variations in Paco2 on Brain Blood Flow and Cardiac Output in the Newborn Piglet

    Nancy B Hansen;Ann-Mari Brubakk;Dag Bratlid;William Oh

  • Comparison of intravenous and endotracheal epinephrine during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in newborn piglets

    Monica E. Kleinman;William Oh;Barbara S. Stonestreet

  • Anti–IL-6 neutralizing antibody modulates blood-brain barrier function in the ovine fetus

    Jiyong Zhang;Grazyna B. Sadowska;Xiaodi Chen;Seon Yeong Park

  • Comparison of three dosing procedures for administration of bovine surfactant to neonates with respiratory distress syndrome

    Elizabeth M. Zola;J. Harry Gunkel;Raymond K. Chan;Mary O. Lim

  • Postnatal hemodynamic changes in very-low-birthweight infants.

    Toby Debra Yanowitz;Alice C. Yao;Karen D. Pettigrew;John C. Werner

  • White matter injury after cerebral ischemia in ovine fetuses

    Katherine H Petersson;Halit Pinar;Edward G Stopa;Ronald A Faris;Ronald A Faris

  • Effects of prophylactic low-dose indomethacin on hemodynamics in very low birth weight infants.

    Toby Debra Yanowitz;Alice C. Yao;John C. Werner;Karen D. Pettigrew

  • Autoregulation of brain blood flow in the newborn piglet: Regional differences in flow reduction during hypotension

    Abbot Laptook;Barbara S. Stonestreet;William Oh

  • Severe umbilical cord inflammation—a predictor of periventricular leukomalacia in very low birth weight infants

    Karen N. Wharton;Halit Pinar;Barbara S. Stonestreet;Richard Tucker

  • Ischemia-reperfusion impairs blood-brain barrier function and alters tight junction protein expression in the ovine fetus.

    Xiaodi Chen;Steven W. Threlkeld;Erin E. Cummings;Ilona Juan

  • Ovine proinflammatory cytokines cross the murine blood-brain barrier by a common saturable transport mechanism

    Steven W. Threlkeld;Jessica L. Lynch;Kristin M. Lynch;Grazyna B. Sadowska

  • Glucocorticoid accelerates renal functional maturation in fetal lambs

    Barbara S. Stonestreet;Nancy B. Hansen;Abbot R. Laptook;William Oh

  • The effects of different rates of plasmanate infusions upon brain blood flow after asphyxia and hypotension in newborn piglets

    Abbot Laptook;Barbara S. Stonestreet;William Oh

  • Effects of indomethacin on brain blood flow and cerebral metabolism in hypoxic newborn piglets

    M. G. Coyle;W. Oh;B. S. Stonestreet

  • Glucose Disposal of Low Birth Weight Infants: Steady State Hyperglycemia Produced by Constant Intravenous Glucose Infusion

    Richard M. Cowett;William Oh;Arnold Pollak;Robert Schwartz

  • Antenatal steroids decrease blood-brain barrier permeability in the ovine fetus

    Barbara S. Stonestreet;Katherine H. Petersson;Grazyna B. Sadowska;Karen D. Pettigrew

  • Gastrointestinal blood flow and oxygen consumption in awake newborn piglets: effect of feeding

    P. T. Nowicki;B. S. Stonestreet;N. B. Hansen;A. C. Yao

  • Effects of Interleukin-6 on the Expression of Tight Junction Proteins in Isolated Cerebral Microvessels from Yearling and Adult Sheep

    Susan S. Cohen;May Min;Erin E. Cummings;Xiaodi Chen

  • Hemodynamic Effects of Delayed Cord Clamping in Premature Infants WHAT'S KNOWN ON THIS SUBJECT: Delayed umbilical cord clamping in premature infants has been associated with decreased rates of intraventricular hemorrhage; however, the mechanisms that explain this finding have not been described.

    Ross Sommers;Barbara S. Stonestreet;William Oh;Abbot Laptook

Frequent Co-Authors

William Oh
William Oh Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Abbot R. Laptook
Abbot R. Laptook Brown University
Edward G. Stopa
Edward G. Stopa Brown University
William A. Banks
William A. Banks University of Washington
Philip W. Shaul
Philip W. Shaul The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Masahiro Nishibori
Masahiro Nishibori Okayama University
Suzanne M. de la Monte
Suzanne M. de la Monte Brown University
David Warburton
David Warburton University of Southern California
Surendra Sharma
Surendra Sharma Brown University
Betty R. Vohr
Betty R. Vohr Brown University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Neuroscience in the USA can open doors to a range of rewarding and impactful career paths. Beyond lab-based and clinical jobs, many graduates explore related fields where understanding the brain and behavior is crucial. If you are looking to work directly with individuals or families, you might consider earning a masters in marriage and family therapy online, which focuses on mental health and family dynamics.

For those seeking more flexibility, there are several affordable psychology degree options available. For example, you can find a masters in psychology online cheap that provides strong foundations in human behavior, research, and therapy. You can also pursue a psychology degree online at the undergraduate level, ideal for entry-level roles or as a stepping stone to graduate programs.

Another rewarding track is social work. Students looking for accessibility and streamlined admissions may be interested in the easiest msw program. Each of these degree options offers unique ways to apply neuroscience knowledge in professional settings, from therapy to community service.

Best Scientists Citing Barbara S. Stonestreet

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles