World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
71
Citations
16251
World Ranking
2432
National Ranking
1147

Edward G. Stopa publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edward G. Stopa sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 207 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Edward G. Stopa D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edward G. Stopa sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 71 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Edward G. Stopa was affiliated with Brown University in the United States and contributed to research primarily in the fields of Medicine and Immunology and Microbiology. Their work focused on subfields including Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Neurology, and Immunology, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach within biomedical sciences.

Stopa's research topics consistently involved studies of Multiple Sclerosis and related neurological disorders, with particular emphasis on Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders. Additionally, their investigations covered Immunotherapy and Immune Responses, highlighting a focus on the interactions between the immune system and neurological conditions.

During their career, Stopa published work in the following venues:

  • The Journal of Immunology

One notable publication from 2021 was titled Meningeal B Cell Clusters Correlate with Submeningeal Pathology in a Natural Model of Multiple Sclerosis, which appeared in The Journal of Immunology. This paper garnered citations indicative of engagement within the scientific community studying neuroimmunological aspects of disease.

Stopa collaborated frequently with the following researchers:

  • Molly E. Church
  • Guadalupe Ceja
  • Megan McGeehan
  • Miles C. Miller
  • Priscilla Silva Farias

Their joint efforts likely contributed to advancing understanding in areas intersecting immunology and neurology, particularly concerning immune system involvement in multiple sclerosis.

Best Publications

  • Advanced glycation end products contribute to amyloidosis in Alzheimer disease

    M. P. Vitek;Keshab Bhattacharya;J. M. Glendening;E. Stopa

  • Multiplicity of cerebrospinal fluid functions: New challenges in health and disease

    Conrad E Johanson;John A Duncan;Petra M Klinge;Thomas Brinker

  • A new look at cerebrospinal fluid circulation

    Thomas Brinker;Edward G Stopa;John Morrison;Petra Klinge

  • Putative melatonin receptors in a human biological clock

    Steven M. Reppert;David R. Weaver;Scott A. Rivkees;Edward G. Stopa

  • RAGE, LRP-1, and amyloid-beta protein in Alzheimer’s disease

    John E. Donahue;Stephanie L. Flaherty;Conrad E. Johanson;John A. Duncan

  • Microvascular injury and blood-brain barrier leakage in Alzheimer's disease.

    B.D. Zipser;C.E. Johanson;L. Gonzalez;T.M. Berzin

  • Expression of heme oxygenase-1 in the senescent and Alzheimer-diseased brain.

    H. M. Schipper;S. Cissé;E. G. Stopa

  • Neural Heme Oxygenase-1 Expression in Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease

    H.M. Schipper;A. Liberman;E.G. Stopa

  • Pathologic evaluation of the human suprachiasmatic nucleus in severe dementia.

    Edward G. Stopa;Ladislav Volicer;Victoria Kuo-Leblanc;David Harper

  • Differential circadian rhythm disturbances in men with Alzheimer disease and frontotemporal degeneration.

    David G. Harper;Edward G. Stopa;Ann C. McKee;Andrew Satlin

  • Circadian Locomotor Activity and Core-Body Temperature Rhythms in Alzheimer's Disease

    Andrew Satlin;Ladislav Volicer;Edward G. Stopa;David Harper

  • Melatonin receptors in human hypothalamus and pituitary: implications for circadian and reproductive responses to melatonin

    D R Weaver;J H Stehle;E G Stopa;S M Reppert

  • The Blood–Cerebrospinal Fluid Barrier: Structure and Functional Significance

    Conrad E. Johanson;Edward G. Stopa;Paul N. McMillan

  • Interaction of colocalized neuropeptides: functional significance in the circadian timing system.

    H. E. Albers;Shyh-Yuh Liou;E. G. Stopa;R. T. Zoeller

  • Alzheimer's Therapeutics Targeting Amyloid Beta 1–42 Oligomers I: Abeta 42 Oligomer Binding to Specific Neuronal Receptors Is Displaced by Drug Candidates That Improve Cognitive Deficits

    Nicholas J. Izzo;Agnes Staniszewski;Lillian To;Mauro Fa

  • Basic fibroblast growth factor in Alzheimer's disease.

    Edward G. Stopa;Ana-Maria Gonzalez;Regina Chorsky;Robert J. Corona

  • Hippocampal RAGE Immunoreactivity in Early and Advanced Alzheimer’s Disease

    Miles C. Miller;Rosemarie Tavares;Conrad E. Johanson;Virginia Hovanesian

  • Disturbance of Endogenous Circadian Rhythm in Aging and Alzheimer Disease

    David G. Harper;Ladislav Volicer;Edward G. Stopa;Ann C. McKee

  • Anti-striatal antibodies in Tourette syndrome cause neuronal dysfunction.

    Joseph J. Hallett;Christine J. Harling-Berg;Paul M. Knopf;Edward G. Stopa;Edward G. Stopa

  • Agrin and microvascular damage in Alzheimer's disease.

    Tyler M. Berzin;Brian D. Zipser;Michael S. Rafii;Victoria Kuo-Leblanc

Frequent Co-Authors

Conrad E. Johanson
Conrad E. Johanson Brown University
Andrew Baird
Andrew Baird University of California, San Diego
Barbara S. Stonestreet
Barbara S. Stonestreet Brown University
Michael P. Vitek
Michael P. Vitek Duke University
Hyman M. Schipper
Hyman M. Schipper McGill University
Ann C. McKee
Ann C. McKee Boston University
Suzanne M. de la Monte
Suzanne M. de la Monte Brown University
Justin R. Fallon
Justin R. Fallon Brown University
Stephen Salloway
Stephen Salloway Brown University
Todd M. Preuss
Todd M. Preuss Emory University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Neuroscience, a variety of online degrees and educational routes can help you advance your career. Psychology, social work, counseling, and marriage and family therapy all intersect with neuroscience and offer rewarding paths to support individuals and communities.

Pursuing an online psychology degree cheap can be a cost-effective starting point, providing foundational knowledge in brain science and behavior. If you’re looking for the most accessible route to working in social services, consider reviewing the easiest msw programs to get into, which can prepare you for clinical and community work.

For those interested in clinical roles, exploring the shortest online psyd programs can accelerate your path toward becoming a licensed psychologist. Alternatively, individuals focused on relationship dynamics and therapy might consider lmft online programs to qualify as a licensed marriage and family therapist.

Each of these degrees addresses unique aspects of neuroscience and mental health, offering flexible online formats and diverse career opportunities in both research and practice.

Best Scientists Citing Edward G. Stopa

Recently Published Articles