World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
74
Citations
15676
World Ranking
2144
National Ranking
69

Frank van Bel publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank van Bel sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 319 publications — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Frank van Bel D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank van Bel sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Frank van Bel is affiliated with Utrecht University in the Netherlands and has a significant body of research contributions primarily in the field of Medicine. Their work spans multiple subfields including Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Nutrition and Dietetics, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Epidemiology.

The scientist's research topics include neonatal respiratory health, infant nutrition and health, neonatal and maternal infections, infant development and preterm care, neonatal and fetal brain pathology, pediatric pain management techniques, and birth, development, and health.

Frequent coauthors of Frank van Bel include Anton H. van Kaam, Hendrik J. Niemarkt, Christian V. Hulzebos, Marc A. Benninga, and Nanne K.H. de Boer.

Van Bel has published extensively in journals focusing on pediatric and neonatal health. The most frequent publication venues are the European Journal of Pediatrics, Nutrients, Frontiers in Pediatrics, Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal & Neonatal, and Acta Paediatrica.

Selected recent papers authored or coauthored by van Bel include:

  • Real-time continuous glucose monitoring in preterm infants (REACT): an international, open-label, randomised controlled trial, 2021, The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health
  • Profound Pathogen-Specific Alterations in Intestinal Microbiota Composition Precede Late-Onset Sepsis in Preterm Infants: A Longitudinal, Multicenter, Case-Control Study, 2020, Clinical Infectious Diseases
  • Effect of a Multi-Strain Probiotic on the Incidence and Severity of Necrotizing Enterocolitis and Feeding Intolerances in Preterm Neonates, 2022, Nutrients
  • Association between duration of early empiric antibiotics and necrotizing enterocolitis and late-onset sepsis in preterm infants: a multicenter cohort study, 2022, European Journal of Pediatrics
  • Predictive factors for surgical treatment in preterm neonates with necrotizing enterocolitis: a multicenter case-control study, 2020, European Journal of Pediatrics

Best Publications

  • Mesenchymal stem cell treatment after neonatal hypoxic-ischemic brain injury improves behavioral outcome and induces neuronal and oligodendrocyte regeneration.

    Cindy T.J. van Velthoven;Annemieke Kavelaars;Frank van Bel;Cobi Jacoba Johanna Heijnen

  • Impact of Patent Ductus Arteriosus and Subsequent Therapy With Indomethacin on Cerebral Oxygenation in Preterm Infants

    Petra M. A. Lemmers;Mona C. Toet;Frank van Bel

  • Monitoring neonatal regional cerebral oxygen saturation in clinical practice: value and pitfalls.

    Frank van Bel;Petra Lemmers;Gunnar Naulaers

  • Cerebral oxygenation and electrical activity after birth asphyxia: their relation to outcome

    Mona C Toet;Petra M A Lemmers;Leonard J van Schelven;Frank van Bel

  • Cerebral oxygenation, extraction, and autoregulation in very preterm infants who develop peri-intraventricular hemorrhage.

    Thomas Alderliesten;Petra M.A. Lemmers;Janneke J.M. Smarius;René E. van de Vosse

  • Repeated Mesenchymal Stem Cell Treatment after Neonatal Hypoxia–Ischemia Has Distinct Effects on Formation and Maturation of New Neurons and Oligodendrocytes Leading to Restoration of Damage, Corticospinal Motor Tract Activity, and Sensorimotor Function

    Cindy T J Van Velthoven;Annemieke Kavelaars;Frank Van Bel;Cobi Jacoba Johanna Heijnen

  • Impact of nutrition on brain development and its neuroprotective implications following preterm birth

    Kristin Keunen;Ruurd M. van Elburg;Frank van Bel;Manon J. N. L. Benders

  • Nasal Administration of Stem Cells: A Promising Novel Route to Treat Neonatal Ischemic Brain Damage

    Cindy T J Van Velthoven;Annemieke Kavelaars;Frank Van Bel;Cobi Jacoba Johanna Heijnen

  • Intranasal Mesenchymal Stem Cell Treatment for Neonatal Brain Damage: Long-Term Cognitive and Sensorimotor Improvement

    Vanessa Donega;Cindy T. J. van Velthoven;Cora H. Nijboer;Frank van Bel

  • Neuroprotective properties and mechanisms of erythropoietin in in vitro and in vivo experimental models for hypoxia/ischemia.

    Michael A. van der Kooij;Floris Groenendaal;Annemieke Kavelaars;Cobi Jacoba Johanna Heijnen

  • Cell therapy for neonatal hypoxia-ischemia and cerebral palsy.

    Laura Bennet;Sidhartha Tan;Lotte Van Den Heuij;Matthew Derrick

  • Which neuroprotective agents are ready for bench to bedside translation in the newborn infant

    Nicola J. Robertson;Sidhartha Tan;Floris Groenendaal;Frank van Bel

  • Hypotension in Preterm Neonates: Low Blood Pressure Alone Does Not Affect Neurodevelopmental Outcome

    Thomas Alderliesten;Petra M.A. Lemmers;Ingrid C. van Haastert;Linda S. de Vries

  • Gender-specific neuroprotection by 2-iminobiotin after hypoxia-ischemia in the neonatal rat via a nitric oxide independent pathway

    Cora H A Nijboer;Floris Groenendaal;Annemieke Kavelaars;Henrik H Hagberg

  • Comparing near-infrared spectroscopy devices and their sensors for monitoring regional cerebral oxygen saturation in the neonate.

    Laura M.L. Dix;Frank van Bel;Wim Baerts;Petra M.A. Lemmers

  • Effect of indomethacin on superior mesenteric artery blood flow velocity in preterm infants

    Frank Van Bel;Diny Van Zoeren;Jaap Schipper;Gerard L. Gult

  • Impaired oligodendrocyte maturation in preterm infants: Potential therapeutic targets

    Erik van Tilborg;Cobi Jacoba Johanna Heijnen;Manon J. Benders;Frank van Bel

  • Indomethacin-induced changes in renal blood flow velocity waveform in premature infants investigated with color Doppler imaging

    Frank van Bel;Gerard L. Guit;Jaap Schipper;Margot van de Bor

  • Brain-Sparing in Intrauterine Growth Restriction: Considerations for the Neonatologist

    Emily Cohen;Willem Baerts;Frank van Bel

  • Cerebral oxygenation and cerebral oxygen extraction in the preterm infant: the impact of respiratory distress syndrome.

    Petra M. A. Lemmers;Mona Toet;Leonard J. van Schelven;Frank van Bel

  • A Dual Role of the NF-κB Pathway in Neonatal Hypoxic-Ischemic Brain Damage

    Cora H. Nijboer;Cobi Jacoba Johanna Heijnen;Floris Groenendaal;Michael J. May

  • Neuroprotection by selective nitric oxide synthase inhibition at 24 hours after perinatal hypoxia-ischemia

    Cacha Peeters-Scholte;Johanna Koster;Wouter Veldhuis;Evelyn van den Tweel

Frequent Co-Authors

Floris Groenendaal
Floris Groenendaal Utrecht University
Cobi Jacoba Johanna Heijnen
Cobi Jacoba Johanna Heijnen The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Annemieke Kavelaars
Annemieke Kavelaars The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Paul Steendijk
Paul Steendijk Leiden University Medical Center
Linda S. de Vries
Linda S. de Vries Utrecht University
Gerard H.A. Visser
Gerard H.A. Visser Utrecht University
Gorm Greisen
Gorm Greisen Copenhagen University Hospital
Christian Gluud
Christian Gluud University of Southern Denmark
Ben Willem J. Mol
Ben Willem J. Mol Monash University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As you explore Neuroscience studies in the USA, it's useful to consider related fields and advanced online degrees that can complement or expand your career opportunities. Degrees in psychology or related social sciences are particularly relevant, given the shared focus on human behavior, brain function, and mental health.

For those interested in clinical work or counseling, a lmft degree provides specialized training for family and relationship therapy. If you want to delve deeper into psychological research or clinical practice, a masters in psychology online can offer flexibility and a cost-effective path to advanced credentials.

Affordability is a critical concern for many students. Exploring psychology degree cost can help you find programs that fit your budget without compromising educational quality. Additionally, for those passionate about supporting individuals and communities, pursuing a masters in social work prepares you for impactful roles in mental health, advocacy, and public service.

Each of these pathways intersects with neuroscience and broadens your career possibilities in mental health, research, or therapy, even if your core interest lies in the brain and behavior.

Best Scientists Citing Frank van Bel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles