World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
40
Citations
8058
World Ranking
9194
National Ranking
3914

Akhil Kumar publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Akhil Kumar sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 166 publications — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Akhil Kumar D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Akhil Kumar sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Akhil Kumar is affiliated with Pennsylvania State University in the United States. Their research spans multiple domains within computer science and business management, with a total of 15 publications in computer science and 13 in business, management, and accounting.

The scientist's main research areas include information systems, management information systems, and strategy and management, alongside contributions to artificial intelligence and atomic and molecular physics, and optics.

In terms of research topics, Akhil Kumar has extensively worked on business process modeling and analysis, service-oriented architecture and web services, and blockchain technology applications and security. Additional topics include IoT and edge/fog computing, semantic web and ontologies, as well as data quality and management, and aspects related to grief, bereavement, and mental health.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Akhil Kumar are:

  • Lijie Wen
  • Rong Liu
  • Pierre Tiako
  • Manos M. Tentzeris
  • Aashish Gupta

Common publication venues for Akhil Kumar's work include:

  • Harvard Dataverse
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Physical Review A / Physical Review, A
  • Sustainability
  • Information Systems Frontiers

The following papers represent recent scholarly contributions:

  • "Maximal quantum entanglement at exceptional points via unitary and thermal dynamics", 2022, Physical Review A / Physical Review, A
  • "A Systematic Literature Review on the Transition to Circular Business Models for Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs)", 2023, Sustainability
  • "Business Workflow Optimization Through Process Model Redesign", 2020, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
  • "Efficient Transition Adjacency Relation Computation for Process Model Similarity", 2020, IEEE Transactions on Services Computing
  • "Multi-level Team Assignment in Social Business Processes: An Algorithm and Simulation Study", 2021, Information Systems Frontiers

Akhil Kumar has also authored a book titled "Automated Systems, Data, and Sustainable Computing," published by Chronicle of Computing in 2022.

Best Publications

  • Process Mining Manifesto

    Wil van der Aalst;Wil van der Aalst;Arya Adriansyah;Ana Karla Alves de Medeiros;Franco Arcieri

  • Is Blockchain a Silver Bullet for Supply Chain Management? Technical Challenges and Research Opportunities

    Akhil Kumar;Rong Liu;Zhe Shan

  • Analyzing the Resilience of Complex Supply Network Topologies Against Random and Targeted Disruptions

    Kang Zhao;A Kumar;T P Harrison;J Yen

  • XML-Based Schema Definition for Support of Interorganizational Workflow

    W. M. P. van der Aalst;Akhil Kumar

  • Hierarchical quorum consensus: a new algorithm for managing replicated data

    A. Kumar

  • Research Commentary: Workflow Management Issues in e-Business

    Amit Basu;Akhil Kumar

  • W-RBAC — A Workflow Security Model Incorporating Controlled Overriding of Constraints

    Jacques Wainer;Paulo Barthelmess;Akhil Kumar

  • A dynamic warehouse for XML Data of the Web.

    Vassilis Christophides;Richard Hull;Akhil Kumar;Jérôme Siméon

  • An analysis and taxonomy of unstructured workflows

    Rong Liu;Akhil Kumar

  • Dynamic Work Distribution in Workflow Management Systems: How to Balance Quality and Performance

    Akhil Kumar;Wil M. P. Van Der Aalst;Eric M. W. Verbeek

  • A reference model for team-enabled workflow management systems

    W. M. P. van der Aalst;A. Kumar

  • A formal modeling approach for supply chain event management

    Rong Liu;Akhil Kumar;Wil van der Aalst

  • A framework for document-driven workflow systems

    Jianrui Wang;Akhil Kumar

  • Dynamic Routing and Operational Controls in Workflow Management Systems

    Akhil Kumar;J. Leon Zhao

  • DW-RBAC: A formal security model of delegation and revocation in workflow systems

    Jacques Wainer;Akhil Kumar;Paulo Barthelmess

  • An empirical comparison of neural network and logistic regression models

    Akhil Kumar;Vithala R. Rao;Harsh Soni

  • A fine-grained, controllable, user-to-user delegation method in RBAC

    Jacques Wainer;Akhil Kumar

  • Conceptual model for online auditing

    Wil van der Aalst;Kees van Hee;Jan Martijn van der Werf;Akhil Kumar

  • Design and management of flexible process variants using templates and rules

    Akhil Kumar;Wen Yao

  • Achieving High Robustness in Supply Distribution Networks by Rewiring

    Kang Zhao;A Kumar;J Yen

Frequent Co-Authors

Manfred Reichert
Manfred Reichert University of Ulm
Wil M. P. van der Aalst
Wil M. P. van der Aalst RWTH Aachen University
Jianmin Wang
Jianmin Wang Tsinghua University
J. Leon Zhao
J. Leon Zhao Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen
John Yen
John Yen Pennsylvania State University
Sharad Singhal
Sharad Singhal Hewlett-Packard (United States)
Jacques Wainer
Jacques Wainer State University of Campinas
Ernesto Damiani
Ernesto Damiani Khalifa University
Stefanie Rinderle-Ma
Stefanie Rinderle-Ma Technical University of Munich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA opens up a wide range of online degree options, making advanced education more accessible and flexible than ever. Many students seek least expensive online masters to gain specialized skills without incurring massive debt. These programs are ideal for those looking to boost their career opportunities in tech-related fields.

For professionals aiming to move into executive or academic roles, pursuing a phd in leadership online offers a practical route. This credential can help you lead teams, manage large projects, or shape organizational strategy, building on your technical foundation.

If you’re just starting your academic journey or want a fast entry into the workforce, exploring associates degrees can be a smart first step. These programs often provide practical, job-ready skills in less time, and at a lower cost than traditional four-year degrees.

Educators focusing on leadership roles in academic institutions may benefit from the cheapest online edd programs no gre. These convenient online options remove barriers to entry and help you advance in educational leadership without standardized testing requirements.

Best Scientists Citing Akhil Kumar

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles