World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
36
Citations
5646
World Ranking
11246
National Ranking
42

Jacques Wainer publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jacques Wainer sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 163 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Jacques Wainer D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jacques Wainer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jacques Wainer is a researcher affiliated with the State University of Campinas in Brazil, focusing primarily on computer science. Their work spans several key subfields including artificial intelligence, computer vision and pattern recognition, signal processing, genetics, and electrical and electronic engineering.

Their research topics are concentrated in areas such as machine learning and data classification, biometric identification and security, face recognition and analysis, anomaly detection techniques and applications, imbalanced data classification techniques, metaheuristic optimization algorithms research, and virus-based gene therapy research.

Wainer has authored multiple recent papers covering a range of subjects in these fields. Some notable publications include:

  • "Detecting face presentation attacks in mobile devices with a patch-based CNN and a sensor-aware loss function" (2020) published in PLoS ONE
  • "Nested cross-validation when selecting classifiers is overzealous for most practical applications" (2021) published in Expert Systems with Applications
  • "Open-Set Support Vector Machines" (2021) published in IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Systems
  • "An empirical evaluation of imbalanced data strategies from a practitioner's point of view" (2024) published in Expert Systems with Applications
  • "How to tune the RBF SVM hyperparameters? An empirical evaluation of 18 search algorithms" (2021) published in Artificial Intelligence Review

Wainer frequently collaborates with other researchers, including Anderson Rocha, Waldir R. De Almeida, Fernanda Andaló, Rafael Padilha, and Gabriel Bertocco. These collaborations have contributed to a body of work that has appeared multiple times in selected publication venues such as:

  • Expert Systems with Applications
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Metabolism
  • PLoS ONE

The main field of study for Wainer is computer science, with 23 publications mapped to this general discipline and a particular focus on 14 publications related to artificial intelligence. Their research contributions emphasize methodological and applied aspects of machine learning, verification and evaluation of algorithms, as well as practical issues such as data imbalance and hyperparameter tuning in support vector machines.

Best Publications

  • Automatic fruit and vegetable classification from images

    Anderson Rocha;Daniel C. Hauagge;Jacques Wainer;Siome Goldenstein

  • A conceptual model of groupware

    Clarence Ellis;Jacques Wainer

  • Groupware and computer supported cooperative work

    Clarence Ellis;Jacques Wainer

  • W-RBAC — A Workflow Security Model Incorporating Controlled Overriding of Constraints

    Jacques Wainer;Paulo Barthelmess;Akhil Kumar

  • Nested cross-validation when selecting classifiers is overzealous for most practical applications

    Jacques Wainer;Gavin C. Cawley

  • PROCLETS: A FRAMEWORK FOR LIGHTWEIGHT INTERACTING WORKFLOW PROCESSES

    van der Wmp Wil Aalst;P Barthelmess;CA Ellis;J Wainer

  • Points of Interest and Visual Dictionaries for Automatic Retinal Lesion Detection

    A. Rocha;T. Carvalho;H. F. Jelinek;S. Goldenstein

  • A competition on generalized software-based face presentation attack detection in mobile scenarios

    Z. Boulkenafet;J. Komulainen;Z. Akhtar;A. Benlamoudi

  • DW-RBAC: A formal security model of delegation and revocation in workflow systems

    Jacques Wainer;Akhil Kumar;Paulo Barthelmess

  • A data-driven approach to referable diabetic retinopathy detection.

    Ramon Pires;Sandra Avila;Jacques Wainer;Eduardo Valle

  • A fine-grained, controllable, user-to-user delegation method in RBAC

    Jacques Wainer;Akhil Kumar

  • Algorithms for anomaly detection of traces in logs of process aware information systems

    FáBio Bezerra;Jacques Wainer

  • Workflow Modeling Using Proclets

    Wil M. P. van der Aalst;Wil M. P. van der Aalst;Paulo Barthelmess;Clarence A. Ellis;Jacques Wainer;Jacques Wainer

  • Anomaly Detection Using Process Mining

    Fábio Bezerra;Jacques Wainer;W. M. P. van der Aalst

  • Too much computer and Internet use is bad for your grades, especially if you are young and poor: Results from the 2001 Brazilian SAEB

    Jacques Wainer;Tom Dwyer;Rodrigo Silveira Dutra;Andre Covic

  • Advancing bag-of-visual-words representations for lesion classification in retinal images.

    Ramon Pires;Herbert F. Jelinek;Jacques Wainer;Eduardo Valle

  • Anomaly Detection Using Process Mining.

    Fábio de Lima Bezerra;Jacques Wainer;Wil M. P. van der Aalst

  • Scientific Workflow Systems

    J Wainer;M Weske;G Vossen;Medeiros C Bauzer

  • Applying scheduling techniques to minimize the number of late jobs in workflow systems

    Gregório Baggio;Jacques Wainer;Clarence Ellis

  • Probabilistic Multiagent Patrolling

    Tiago Sak;Jacques Wainer;Siome Klein Goldenstein

Frequent Co-Authors

Anderson Rocha
Anderson Rocha State University of Campinas
Akhil Kumar
Akhil Kumar Pennsylvania State University
Ricardo da Silva Torres
Ricardo da Silva Torres Wageningen University & Research
Gavin C. Cawley
Gavin C. Cawley University of East Anglia
Wil M. P. van der Aalst
Wil M. P. van der Aalst RWTH Aachen University
Hal Daumé
Hal Daumé University of Maryland, College Park
Michael D. Abràmoff
Michael D. Abràmoff University of Iowa
Sébastien Marcel
Sébastien Marcel Idiap Research Institute
Gottfried Vossen
Gottfried Vossen University of Münster
Amir H. Mohammadi
Amir H. Mohammadi University of KwaZulu-Natal

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Computer Science provides a flexible path for students from diverse backgrounds. Those looking to minimize tuition costs can consider the cheapest online college options, which offer quality education without overwhelming debt.

Admissions requirements can vary. For applicants who may not meet traditional academic benchmarks, there are online graduate schools with low gpa requirements. These programs make advanced study accessible to a wider range of students.

Accelerated pathways are increasingly popular for motivated learners. If you’re ready to fast-track your degree, consider an accelerated computer science degree online. These options allow you to enter the workforce more quickly and advance your tech career.

Computer Science graduates enjoy versatile career paths, but if your interests overlap with other fields, it’s worth exploring broader options. Ask yourself, what can i do with an environmental science degree? This can help you discover interdisciplinary opportunities where tech skills are valuable.

Best Scientists Citing Jacques Wainer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles