World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
68
Citations
24481
World Ranking
2048
National Ranking
1036

Richard Hull publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard Hull sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 271 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Richard Hull D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard Hull sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2007 - ACM Fellow For contributions to data semantics and web services.

Overview

Richard Hull is affiliated with the Spring Hills Foundation in the United States. Their work is recognized in academic and professional circles, particularly in the domain of data semantics and web services. In 2007, Hull was named an ACM Fellow for contributions to these areas.

Hull's award, the ACM Fellow distinction, specifically cites their work "For contributions to data semantics and web services," indicating a focus on how data is structured, interpreted, and utilized in web-based applications and networks.

There are no recorded publications, co-authors, main or subfields of study, or detailed topics available in the provided data to further elaborate on Hull's research output or collaborations. Similarly, no book publications or frequent publication venues have been noted. However, the existing data highlights a career connected to computational semantics and web technologies.

Best Publications

  • Foundations of databases

    Serge Abiteboul;Richard Hull;Victor Vianu

  • Semantic database modeling: survey, applications, and research issues

    Richard Hull;Roger King

  • IFO: a formal semantic database model

    Serge Abiteboul;Richard Hull

  • Blockchains for Business Process Management - Challenges and Opportunities

    Jan Mendling;Ingo Weber;Wil Van Der Aalst;Jan Vom Brocke

  • Foundations of Databases: The Logical Level

    Serge Abiteboul;Richard Hull;Victor Vianu

  • Savannah: mobile gaming and learning?

    Keri Facer;Richard W. Joiner;Danae Stanton;Josephine Reid

  • Conversation specification: a new approach to design and analysis of e-service composition

    Tevfik Bultan;Xiang Fu;Richard Hull;Jianwen Su

  • Managing semantic heterogeneity in databases: a theoretical prospective

    Richard Hull

  • Business Artifacts: A Data-centric Approach to Modeling Business Operations and Processes

    David Cohn;Richard Hull

  • Towards formal analysis of artifact-centric business process models

    Kamal Bhattacharya;Cagdas Gerede;Richard Hull;Rong Liu

  • Automatic composition of transition-based semantic web services with messaging

    Daniela Berardi;Diego Calvanese;Giuseppe De Giacomo;Richard Hull

  • Relative information capacity of simple relational database schemata

    Richard Hull

  • Artifact-Centric Business Process Models: Brief Survey of Research Results and Challenges

    Richard Hull

  • A framework for supporting data integration using the materialized and virtual approaches

    Richard Hull;Gang Zhou

  • E-services: a look behind the curtain

    Richard Hull;Michael Benedikt;Vassilis Christophides;Jianwen Su

  • On the equivalence of incremental and fixpoint semantics for business artifacts with Guard-Stage-Milestone lifecycles

    Elio Damaggio;Richard Hull;Roman VaculíN

  • Automatic verification of data-centric business processes

    Alin Deutsch;Richard Hull;Fabio Patrizi;Victor Vianu

  • Introducing the guard-stage-milestone approach for specifying business entity lifecycles

    Richard Hull;Elio Damaggio;Fabiana Fournier;Manmohan Gupta

  • Knowledge and Innovation in the New Service Economy

    Birgitte Andersen;Jeremy Howells;Richard Hull;Ian Miles

  • ILOG: declarative creation and manipulation of object identifiers

    Richard Hull;Masatoshi Yoshikawa

  • Automatic verification of data-centric business processes

    Elio Damaggio;Alin Deutsch;Richard Hull;Victor Vianu

  • Blockchains for Business Process Management - Challenges and Opportunities

    Jan Mendling;Ingo Weber;Wil van der Aalst;Jan vom Brocke

Frequent Co-Authors

Jianwen Su
Jianwen Su University of California, Santa Barbara
Serge Abiteboul
Serge Abiteboul École Normale Supérieure
Victor Vianu
Victor Vianu University of California, San Diego
Seymour Ginsburg
Seymour Ginsburg University of Southern California
Diego Calvanese
Diego Calvanese Free University of Bozen-Bolzano
Jan Mendling
Jan Mendling Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Alin Deutsch
Alin Deutsch University of California, San Diego
Timothy G. Griffin
Timothy G. Griffin University of Cambridge
Dan Suciu
Dan Suciu University of Washington
Guozhu Dong
Guozhu Dong Wright State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education in the USA opens up many flexible options for students interested in Computer Science and adjacent fields. If your academic record includes a low GPA, there are online colleges that accept 2.0 GPA, making higher education and advancement in tech more accessible than ever.

An online computer science degree can quickly prepare you for roles in programming, software development, data analysis, and IT management. These programs are ideal for those needing to balance work or other commitments while pursuing their studies.

Interested in interdisciplinary roles? Those with backgrounds in elementary education or other sciences can extend their opportunities with jobs with elementary education and environmental science degree, spanning educational and environmental sectors.

For those passionate about sustainable technology, consider environmental engineering schools online to prepare for impactful careers in green innovation and resource management. Online options can help you pursue your goals at your own pace, regardless of your background.

Best Scientists Citing Richard Hull

Trending Scientists