World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
39
Citations
6081
World Ranking
9798
National Ranking
612

Michael Benedikt publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Benedikt sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 192 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Michael Benedikt D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Benedikt sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael Benedikt is affiliated with the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom and works primarily in the field of Computer Science. Their research contributions span several subfields including Artificial Intelligence, Computer Networks and Communications, and Computational Theory and Mathematics.

The scientist's work focuses on topics such as Advanced Database Systems and Queries, Semantic Web and Ontologies, Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge, semigroups and automata theory, Formal Methods in Verification, Data Management and Algorithms, and Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms.

The list of recent publications by Michael Benedikt includes:

  • Two Variable Logic with Ultimately Periodic Counting, 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Rewriting the infinite chase, 2022, Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment

Michael Benedikt frequently collaborates with several co-authors, among them Enrique Casanovas, Matthias Aschenbrenner, Verónica Becher, Lev D. Beklemishev, and Stephen Jackson, each with multiple joint publications.

The main publication venues for this scientist include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Journal of Symbolic Logic
  • Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (Schloss Dagstuhl)
  • Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment
  • ACM Transactions on Computational Logic

Best Publications

  • XPath satisfiability in the presence of DTDs

    Michael Benedikt;Wenfei Fan;Floris Geerts

  • E-services: a look behind the curtain

    Richard Hull;Michael Benedikt;Vassilis Christophides;Jianwen Su

  • VeriWeb: Automatically Testing Dynamic Web Sites

    Michael Benedikt;Juliana Freire;Patrice Godefroid

  • Analysis of recursive state machines

    Rajeev Alur;Michael Benedikt;Kousha Etessami;Patrice Godefroid

  • Safe Constraint Queries

    Michael Benedikt;Leonid Libkin

  • Relational expressive power of constraint query languages

    Michael Benedikt;Guozhu Dong;Leonid Libkin;Limsoon Wong

  • Relational expressive power of constraint query languages

    Michael Benedikt;Guozhu Dong;Leonid Libkin;Limsoon Wong

  • Structural Properties of XPath Fragments

    Michael Benedikt;Wenfei Fan;Gabriel M. Kuper

  • XPath leashed

    Michael Benedikt;Christoph Koch

  • XPath satisfiability in the presence of DTDs

    Michael Benedikt;Wenfei Fan;Floris Geerts

  • Efficient network aware search in collaborative tagging sites

    Sihem Amer Yahia;Michael Benedikt;Laks V. S. Lakshmanan;Julia Stoyanovich

  • Computational Models of Space: Isovists and Isovist Fields

    L. S. Davis;M. L. Benedikt

  • Automatic exploration and testing of dynamic Web sites

    Michael Abraham Benedikt;Juliana Freire Silva;Patrice Ismael Godefroid;Avinash Vyas

  • Structured voicemail messages

    Thomas J. Ball;Michael Abraham Benedikt;Peter Andrew Mataga;Carlos Miguel Puchol

  • Method and apparatus for generating program code for world wide web service applications

    Michael Abraham Benedikt;David Alan Ladd;James Christopher Ramming

  • Benchmarking the Chase

    Michael Benedikt;George Konstantinidis;Giansalvatore Mecca;Boris Motik

  • Integrated web and telephone service creation

    David L. Atkins;Thomas Ball;Thomas R. Baran;Michael A. Benedikt

  • Structural properties of XPath fragments

    Michael Benedikt;Wenfei Fan;Gabriel Kuper

  • A Decidable Logic for Describing Linked Data Structures

    Michael Benedikt;Thomas W. Reps;Shmuel Sagiv

  • LTL model checking of interval markov chains

    Michael Benedikt;Rastislav Lenhardt;James Worrell

  • Model Checking of Unrestricted Hierarchical State Machines

    Michael Benedikt;Patrice Godefroid;Thomas W. Reps

Frequent Co-Authors

Leonid Libkin
Leonid Libkin University of Edinburgh
Thomas Ball
Thomas Ball Microsoft (United States)
Balder ten Cate
Balder ten Cate University of Amsterdam
James Worrell
James Worrell University of Oxford
Wenfei Fan
Wenfei Fan University of Edinburgh
Luc Segoufin
Luc Segoufin French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation - INRIA
Patrice Godefroid
Patrice Godefroid Microsoft (United States)
Rajeev Rastogi
Rajeev Rastogi Amazon (United States)
Juliana Freire
Juliana Freire New York University
Thomas Reps
Thomas Reps University of Wisconsin–Madison

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degree options in Computer Science opens many career pathways. As tech innovation evolves rapidly, choosing the top degrees for the future can help you stay competitive in a dynamic job market. Many students consider programs that offer both flexibility and relevance, especially those that target high-demand sectors like data science and cybersecurity.

For those looking to upskill quickly, the availability of some of the easiest masters degrees can be appealing. These programs often focus on foundational knowledge and are structured for working professionals.

If you're interested in advanced research, finding the cheapest doctoral programs online allows you to minimize costs while pursuing top academic credentials. Additionally, educators in tech may consider the accelerated doctoral programs in education online to move quickly into educational leadership or policy roles.

Ultimately, the increasing variety of online options lets students balance affordability, speed, and specialization on the path to rewarding tech careers.

Best Scientists Citing Michael Benedikt

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles