World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
81
Citations
24707
World Ranking
16615
National Ranking
8341

John E. McGowan publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John E. McGowan sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 259 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

John E. McGowan D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John E. McGowan sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 81 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

John E. McGowan is affiliated with Emory University in the United States. Their research contributions include work published in peer-reviewed venues focused on obesity and related fields.

Their recent publication includes the paper titled Abstracts from the 7th UK Congress on Obesity 2022, published in 2023 in the International Journal of Obesity. This paper has received citations, reflecting its role within ongoing scholarly discussions on obesity.

John E. McGowan has collaborated with several researchers, frequently co-authoring papers with the following individuals:

  • Evans Eh
  • Incollingo Ac
  • Nagpal Ts
  • Julia Mueller
  • Ahern Al

Their work has appeared in venues that focus primarily on obesity research, with publications in:

  • International Journal of Obesity

Best Publications

  • Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America Guidelines for Developing an Institutional Program to Enhance Antimicrobial Stewardship

    Timothy H. Dellit;Robert C. Owens;John E. McGowan;Dale N. Gerding

  • Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America and Infectious Diseases Society of America Joint Committee on the Prevention of Antimicrobial Resistance: Guidelines for the Prevention of Antimicrobial Resistance in Hospitals

    David M. Shlaes;Dale N. Gerding;Joseph F. John;William A. Craig

  • Bacteremia at Boston City Hospital: Occurrence and mortality during 12 selected years (1935-1972), with special reference to hospital-acquired cases.

    John E. McGowan;Mildred W. Barnes;Maxwell Finland

  • QUALITY STANDARD FOR ANTIMICROBIAL PROPHYLAXIS IN SURGICAL PROCEDURES

    E. Patchen Dellinger;Peter A. Gross;Trisha L. Barrett;Peter J. Krause

  • Antimicrobial Resistance in Isolates from Inpatients and Outpatients in the United States: Increasing Importance of the Intensive Care Unit

    Lennox Archibald;Lisa Phillips;Dominique Monnet;John E. McGowan

  • Surveillance of Antimicrobial Use and Antimicrobial Resistance in United States Hospitals: Project ICARE Phase 2

    Scott K. Fridkin;Christine D. Steward;Jonathan R. Edwards;Erica R. Pryor

  • Extra charges and prolongation of stay attributable to nosocomial infections: A prospective interhospital comparison

    Robert W. Haley;Dennis R. Schaberg;Kent B. Crossley;Stephen D. Von Allmen

  • Resistance in Nonfermenting Gram-Negative Bacteria: Multidrug Resistance to the Maximum

    J E Mcgowan

  • The Effect of Vancomycin and Third-Generation Cephalosporins on Prevalence of Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci in 126 U.S. Adult Intensive Care Units

    Scott K. Fridkin;Jonathan R. Edwards;Jeanne M. Courval;Holly Hill

  • Bacteremia in Febrile Children Seen in a Walk-in Pediatric Clinic

    John E. MCGowan;Lorna Bratton;Jerome O. Klein;Maxwell Finland

  • Economic impact of antimicrobial resistance.

    John E McGowan

  • Characterization of clinical isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae from 19 laboratories using the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards extended-spectrum beta-lactamase detection methods.

    Christine D. Steward;J. Kamile Rasheed;Susannah K. Hubert;James W. Biddle

  • Carbapenem resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae not detected by automated susceptibility testing.

    Fred C. Tenover;Rajinder K. Kalsi;Portia P. Williams;Roberta B. Carey

  • Preventing the Nosocomial Transmission of Tuberculosis

    Henry M. Blumberg;Dan L. Watkins;Jeffrey D. Berschling;Alexis Antle

  • Testing for Induction of Clindamycin Resistance in Erythromycin-Resistant Isolates of Staphylococcus aureus

    Christine D. Steward;Patti M. Raney;Allison K. Morrell;Portia P. Williams

  • Elimination of Staphylococcus aureus Nasal Carriage in Health Care Workers: Analysis of Six Clinical Trials with Calcium Mupirocin Ointment

    Bradley N. Doebbeling;Debra L. Breneman;Harold C. Neu;Raza Aly

  • Reasons for the Emergence of Antibiotic Resistance

    Fred C. Tenover;John E. McGowan

  • Haemophilus influenzae Infections in Adults: Characterization of Strains by Serotypes, Biotypes, and β-Lactamase Production

    R. J. Wallace;D. M. Musher;E. J. Septimus;J. E. McGowan

  • Do intensive hospital antibiotic control programs prevent the spread of antibiotic resistance

    John E. McGowan

  • Ampicillin-resistant Haemophilus influenzae type B infection.

    Tomeh Mo;Starr Se;McGowan Je;Terry Pm

Frequent Co-Authors

Fred C. Tenover
Fred C. Tenover University of Dayton
Douglas K. Rex
Douglas K. Rex Indiana University
Richard P. Wenzel
Richard P. Wenzel Virginia Commonwealth University
Scott K. Fridkin
Scott K. Fridkin Emory University
J. Kamile Rasheed
J. Kamile Rasheed Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Maxwell Finland
Maxwell Finland Boston University
David Howard
David Howard Newcastle University
Peter J. Krause
Peter J. Krause Yale University
Robert C. Moellering
Robert C. Moellering Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
David L. Paterson
David L. Paterson University of Queensland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online medical degrees opens diverse pathways for prospective students in the USA. One popular choice is pursuing an online rn to bsn no clinicals program, ideal for registered nurses seeking advancement without the need for additional clinical rotations. These flexible formats help RNs balance work, study, and personal commitments.

For those aiming for advanced practice and leadership roles, there are also dnp online programs that allow students to complete their Doctor of Nursing Practice largely through distance education. If research projects are a concern, several dnp programs without dissertation are available, letting candidates focus more on clinical aspects or capstone projects rather than lengthy academic research.

For entry-level professionals, fast track medical lpn programs provide an efficient way to start a nursing career. These online options are typically designed for quick completion, making them attractive for those eager to join the healthcare field sooner.

Choosing the right online pathway can fast-track your medical career, enhance your expertise, and open new professional opportunities—often with a flexibility that suits busy lifestyles.

Best Scientists Citing John E. McGowan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles