World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
69
Citations
24649
World Ranking
1937
National Ranking
981

Thomas Ball publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Ball sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 199 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Thomas Ball D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Ball sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 69 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2011 - ACM Fellow For contributions to software analysis and defect detection.
  • 1934 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Thomas Ball is affiliated with Microsoft in the United States and has contributed to the field of Computer Science through diverse research interests, including applications in teaching programming, embedded systems design, and computational drug discovery methods.

Their research spans several subfields of computer science such as Computer Science Applications, Hardware and Architecture, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Media Technology, and Pharmacology.

Main topics they have worked on include:

  • Teaching and Learning Programming
  • Embedded Systems Design Techniques
  • Experimental Learning in Engineering
  • Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases
  • Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
  • Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques

Thomas Ball has published in multiple venues, with the most frequent including:

  • Computer
  • Communications of the ACM
  • Toxicology Research
  • Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
  • Interaction Design and Children

Some notable papers include:

  • "Physical Computing: A Key Element of Modern Computer Science Education" (2020), Computer
  • "The BBC micro:bit" (2020), Communications of the ACM
  • "Beyond adverse outcome pathways: making toxicity predictions from event networks, SAR models, data and knowledge" (2020), Toxicology Research
  • "Plug-and-play Physical Computing with Jacdac" (2022), Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
  • "How families design and program games: a qualitative analysis of a 4-week online in-home study" (2022), Interaction Design and Children

Frequent coauthors include:

  • Steve Hodges
  • Joe Finney
  • James Devine
  • Peli de Halleux
  • Michał Moskal

Thomas Ball has received recognition in the form of awards such as:

  • ACM Fellow (2011) for contributions to software analysis and defect detection
  • Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Best Publications

  • The SLAM project: debugging system software via static analysis

    Thomas Ball;Sriram K. Rajamani

  • Feedback-Directed Random Test Generation

    Carlos Pacheco;Shuvendu K. Lahiri;Michael D. Ernst;Thomas Ball

  • Mining metrics to predict component failures

    Nachiappan Nagappan;Thomas Ball;Andreas Zeller

  • Automatic predicate abstraction of C programs

    Thomas Ball;Rupak Majumdar;Todd Millstein;Sriram K. Rajamani

  • Use of relative code churn measures to predict system defect density

    Nachiappan Nagappan;Thomas Ball

  • Efficient path profiling

    Thomas Ball;James R. Larus

  • Automatically validating temporal safety properties of interfaces

    Thomas Ball;Sriram K. Rajamani

  • Optimally profiling and tracing programs

    Thomas Ball;James R. Larus

  • Finding and reproducing Heisenbugs in concurrent programs

    Madanlal Musuvathi;Shaz Qadeer;Thomas Ball;Gerard Basler

  • Identifying changes in on-line data repositories

    Thomas J. Ball;Frederick Douglis

  • Exploiting hardware performance counters with flow and context sensitive profiling

    Glenn Ammons;Thomas Ball;James R. Larus

  • Software visualization in the large

    T. Ball;S.G. Eick

  • Bebop: A Symbolic Model Checker for Boolean Programs

    Thomas Ball;Sriram K. Rajamani

  • Thorough static analysis of device drivers

    Thomas Ball;Ella Bounimova;Byron Cook;Vladimir Levin

  • Branch prediction for free

    Thomas Ball;James R. Larus

  • Boolean and Cartesian Abstraction for Model Checking C Programs

    Thomas Ball;Andreas Podelski;Sriram K. Rajamani

  • SLAM and Static Driver Verifier: Technology Transfer of Formal Methods inside Microsoft

    Thomas Ball;Byron Cook;Vladimir Levin;Sriram K. Rajamani

  • From symptom to cause: localizing errors in counterexample traces

    Thomas Ball;Mayur Naik;Sriram K. Rajamani

  • The SLAM Toolkit

    Thomas Ball;Sriram K. Rajamani

  • Automatic predicate abstraction of C programs

    Unknown

  • Optimally Profiling and Tracing

    Thomas Ball;James R. Larus

Frequent Co-Authors

Sriram K. Rajamani
Sriram K. Rajamani Microsoft (United States)
Michael Benedikt
Michael Benedikt University of Oxford
James R. Larus
James R. Larus École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Shuvendu K. Lahiri
Shuvendu K. Lahiri Microsoft (United States)
Nachiappan Nagappan
Nachiappan Nagappan Facebook (United States)
Fred Douglis
Fred Douglis Peraton Labs
Madanlal Musuvathi
Madanlal Musuvathi Microsoft (United States)
Byron Cook
Byron Cook Amazon (United States)
Shaz Qadeer
Shaz Qadeer Microsoft (United States)
Orna Kupferman
Orna Kupferman Hebrew University of Jerusalem

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As the demand for technology professionals rises, online learning offers versatile options beyond traditional computer science programs. Many students now choose to pursue an online computer science degree for greater flexibility and faster completion times. These programs often let you balance study with work or other commitments.

Interested in environmental innovation? You can now earn an environmental engineering degree online, opening doors to careers in sustainability, waste management, or green technology. Online degrees in this field are becoming more accessible and affordable.

Engineering is another major pathway. For students focused on cost, the cheapest online mechanical engineering degree options can help lower tuition costs without sacrificing quality. Many of these programs provide the technical foundation for roles in design, manufacturing, or robotics.

Science-minded students may wonder: can you get a physics degree online? The answer is yes. Online physics programs prepare graduates for further study or entry-level careers in research, analytics, and applied technology.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas Ball

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles