World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
51
Citations
12142
World Ranking
5168
National Ranking
2842

William E. Sedlacek publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William E. Sedlacek sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 258 publications — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

William E. Sedlacek D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William E. Sedlacek sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

William E. Sedlacek is affiliated with the University of Maryland, College Park in the United States. Their academic involvement connects to this institution as the primary affiliation within their scientific career.

Available data does not provide specific details on recent papers, co-authors, publication venues, or books authored by Sedlacek. There is also no available information regarding their main fields of study, subfields of study, or topics of research explored in their work.

Similarly, no information exists about any awards won by Sedlacek, including the year or citation details.

The absence of these particulars indicates the profile is limited to the affiliation without exposition on research focus, publication record, or collaborative networks.

Best Publications

  • Student Perceptions of Campus Cultural Climate by Race

    Julie R. Ancis;William E. Sedlacek;Jonathan J. Mohr

  • The Relationship of Noncognitive Variables to Academic Success: A Longitudinal Comparison by Race.

    Terence J. Tracey;William E. Sedlacek

  • Beyond the Big Test: Noncognitive Assessment in Higher Education

    William E. Sedlacek

  • Noncognitive Variables in Predicting Academic Success by Race

    Terence J. Tracey;William E. Sedlacek

  • The presence of and search for a calling: Connections to career development

    Ryan D. Duffy;William E. Sedlacek

  • Racism in American Education: A Model for Change.

    William E. Sedlacek;Glenwood C. Brooks

  • Prediction of College Graduation Using Noncognitive Variables by Race.

    Terence J. Tracey;William E. Sedlacek

  • Predicting the Academic Success of Student-Athletes Using SAT and Noncognitive Variables

    William E. Sedlacek;Javaune Adams-Gaston

  • Factor Structure and Short Form of the Miville-Guzman Universality-Diversity Scale

    Jairo N. Fuertes;Marie L. Miville;Jonathan J. Mohr;William E. Sedlacek

  • Black Students on White Campuses: 20 Years of Research.

    William E. Sedlacek

  • The Salience of a Career Calling Among College Students: Exploring Group Differences and Links to Religiousness, Life Meaning, and Life Satisfaction

    Ryan D. Duffy;Ryan D. Duffy;William E. Sedlacek

  • Noncognitive Predictors of Academic Success for International Students: A Longitudinal Study.

    Susan P. Boyer;William E. Sedlacek

  • Student Retention and The Use of Campus Facilities by Race

    Brent Mallinckrodt;William E. Sedlacek

  • A Study of Prejudice toward University Student-Athletes.

    Catherine McHUGH Engstrom;William E. Sedlacek

  • A comparison of white and black student academic success using noncognitive variables: A LISREL analysis

    Terence J. Tracey;William E. Sedlacek

  • The Work Values of First-Year College Students: Exploring Group Differences

    Ryan D. Duffy;William E. Sedlacek

  • In Their Own Voices: Latino Student Retention.

    Susan D. Longerbeam;William E. Sedlacek;Helen M. Alatorre

  • The Relationship Between Attitudes Toward Diversity and Overall Satisfaction of University Students by Race

    Edward G. Helm;William E. Sedlacek;Dario O. Prieto

  • An Exploratory Study of Help-Seeking Attitudes and Coping Strategies among College Students by Race and Gender

    Hung-Bin Sheu;William E. Sedlacek

  • So Close, Yet So Far: Predictors of Attrition in College Seniors.

    Jonathan J. Mohr;Keith D. Eiche;William E. Sedlacek

  • Predicting the Academic Success of Student-Athletes Using SAT and Noncognitive Variables. Research Report #20-89.

    William E. Sedlacek;Javaune Adams-Gaston

Frequent Co-Authors

Terence J. G. Tracey
Terence J. G. Tracey Arizona State University
Ryan D. Duffy
Ryan D. Duffy University of Florida
Jonathan J. Mohr
Jonathan J. Mohr University of Maryland, College Park
Jairo N. Fuertes
Jairo N. Fuertes Adelphi University
Frederick T. L. Leong
Frederick T. L. Leong Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen
Charles J. Gelso
Charles J. Gelso University of Maryland, College Park
Brent Mallinckrodt
Brent Mallinckrodt Western Washington University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology can open doors to several related disciplines, with social work often being a popular choice for those who want to make a direct impact in communities. Many students look for affordable educational pathways, especially through online programs that provide flexibility and cost savings.

Social work degrees are offered at a range of price points across the United States. For those considering cost-effective options, our guide to the cheapest social work programs in Mississippi highlights institutions where students can earn valuable credentials without overwhelming debt.

Similarly, the most affordable social work degree programs in New York City provide access to excellent urban resources at reduced tuition rates. Students in the Northeast can also explore the cheapest social work degrees in New Jersey, which can be a great option for both in-state and out-of-state learners.

For learners in the West, the cheapest social work degrees in Nevada present additional choices, especially for those seeking regional job opportunities. Whether you choose psychology or a related field like social work, there are affordable, accredited programs to support your career goals.

Best Scientists Citing William E. Sedlacek

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles