World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 77 18383 17271 234 224 286 23107

Jean-Marc Kaufman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jean-Marc Kaufman between 1974 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jean-Marc Kaufman published across 52 years, from 1974 to 2025, averaging 6 papers a year. Output peaked at 25 publications in 2013. 16 of the 310 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1974 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 25. Peak 25 publications in 2013. 1974: 1 publication 1975: 1 publication 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 0 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 3 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 5 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 14 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 17 publications 2011: 19 publications 2012: 16 publications 2013: 25 publications 2014: 16 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 18 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 13 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 10 publications
1974 2025

310 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jean-Marc Kaufman: publications per year, 1974 to 2025
Year Publications
1974 1
1975 1
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 1
1985 0
1986 2
1987 2
1988 1
1989 0
1990 1
1991 3
1992 0
1993 2
1994 6
1995 5
1996 2
1997 0
1998 3
1999 5
2000 3
2001 1
2002 5
2003 4
2004 6
2005 8
2006 14
2007 8
2008 12
2009 12
2010 17
2011 19
2012 16
2013 25
2014 16
2015 9
2016 18
2017 11
2018 10
2019 13
2020 8
2021 8
2022 13
2023 3
2024 6
2025 10
Total 310
Download as CSV

Jean-Marc Kaufman publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jean-Marc Kaufman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 281–300 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 286 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768 286
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Jean-Marc Kaufman D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jean-Marc Kaufman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 76–77 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730 77
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jean-Marc Kaufman is affiliated with Ghent University Hospital in Belgium and has a research focus situated primarily within the field of Medicine. Their work spans several subfields including Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism; Orthopedics and Sports Medicine; Molecular Biology; Oncology; and Surgery.

The scientist's research concentrates on topics related to bone health and osteoporosis, hormonal and reproductive studies, bone metabolism and diseases, ovarian function and disorders, sexual differentiation and disorders, and muscle metabolism and nutrition. These topics highlight an emphasis on the intersections between hormonal influences, metabolic processes, and musculoskeletal health issues.

Recent notable publications by Kaufman include the following:

  • Is there a role for menopausal hormone therapy in the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis? (2020) published in Osteoporosis International
  • How to manage osteoporosis before the age of 50 (2020) published in Maturitas
  • Management of patients at very high risk of osteoporotic fractures through sequential treatments (2022) published in Aging Clinical and Experimental Research
  • Role of vitamin D supplementation in the management of musculoskeletal diseases: update from an European Society of Clinical and Economical Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO) working group (2022) published in Aging Clinical and Experimental Research
  • Evidence-Based Guideline for the management of osteoporosis in men (2024) published in Nature Reviews Rheumatology

The scientist collaborates frequently with a number of co-authors, including:

  • Bruno Lapauw
  • Tom Fiers
  • René Rizzoli
  • Nicholas C. Harvey
  • Nasser M. Al-Daghri

Kaufman has contributed multiple times to several prominent publication venues:

  • Aging Clinical and Experimental Research (9 publications)
  • The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism (7 publications)
  • Endocrine Abstracts (4 publications)
  • Nature Reviews Rheumatology (3 publications)
  • Osteoporosis International (2 publications)

Best Publications

  • Intravenous zoledronic acid in postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density.

    Ian R. Reid;Jacques P. Brown;Peter Burckhardt;Zebulun Horowitz

  • The effect of teriparatide [human parathyroid hormone (1-34)] therapy on bone density in men with osteoporosis.

    E S Orwoll;W H Scheele;S Paul;S Adami

  • Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Is a Novel Adipokine Potentially Linking Obesity to the Metabolic Syndrome

    Daniela Lamers;Susanne Famulla;Nina Wronkowitz;Sonja Hartwig

  • Pitfalls in the measurement of muscle mass: a need for a reference standard

    Fanny Buckinx;Francesco Landi;Matteo Cesari;Roger A. Fielding

  • Fracture Risk and Zoledronic Acid Therapy in Men with Osteoporosis

    Steven Boonen;Jean-Yves Reginster;Jean-Marc Kaufman;Kurt Lippuner

  • Nutrition and physical activity in the prevention and treatment of sarcopenia: systematic review.

    Charlotte Beaudart;Charlotte Beaudart;A. Dawson;S. C. Shaw;Nicholas C. Harvey

  • Quality of life in sarcopenia and frailty.

    René Rizzoli;Jean-Yves Reginster;Jean-François Arnal;Ivan Bautmans

  • Assessment of muscle function and physical performance in daily clinical practice: a position paper endorsed by the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO).

    Charlotte Beaudart;Yves Rolland;Alfonso J. Cruz-Jentoft;Jürgen M. Bauer

  • Does nutrition play a role in the prevention and management of sarcopenia

    Sian M. Robinson;J.Y. Reginster;R. Rizzoli;S. C. Shaw

  • Investigation, Treatment and Monitoring of Late-Onset Hypogonadism in Males: ISA, ISSAM, and EAU Recommendations

    Christina Wang;Eberhard Nieschlag;Ronald Swerdloff;Hermann M. Behre

  • Frailty and sarcopenia: definitions and outcome parameters

    Cyrus Cooper;Cyrus Cooper;W. Dere;William J Evans;John A. Kanis

  • Vitamin D supplementation in elderly or postmenopausal women: a 2013 update of the 2008 recommendations from the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis (ESCEO)

    R. Rizzoli;S. Boonen;Maria-Luisa Brandi;O. Bruyère

  • Endogenous testosterone and cardiovascular disease in healthy men: a meta-analysis

    Johannes B. Ruige;Ahmed M. Mahmoud;Dirk De Bacquer;Jean Marc Kaufman

  • Central electrophysiologic correlates of pulsatile luteinizing hormone secretion in the rhesus monkey.

    Richard C. Wilson;James S. Kesner;Jean-Marc Kaufman;Tsuguo Uemura

  • Strontium ranelate reduces the risk of vertebral and nonvertebral fractures in women eighty years of age and older.

    Ego Seeman;Bruno Vellas;Claude Benhamou;Jean Pierre Aquino

  • Effects of Dairy Products Consumption on Health: Benefits and Beliefs—A Commentary from the Belgian Bone Club and the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases

    Serge Rozenberg;Jean-Jacques Body;Olivier Bruyère;Pierre Bergmann

  • The physiology of endocrine systems with ageing.

    Annewieke W van den Beld;Jean-Marc Kaufman;M Carola Zillikens;Steven W J Lamberts

  • Harmonized Reference Ranges for Circulating Testosterone Levels in Men of Four Cohort Studies in the United States and Europe

    Thomas G. Travison;Hubert W. Vesper;Eric Orwoll;Frederick Wu

  • Divergences in Insulin Resistance Between the Different Phenotypes of the Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

    Paolo Moghetti;Flavia Tosi;Cecilia Bonin;Daniela Di Sarra

  • Adverse Reactions and Drug–Drug Interactions in the Management of Women with Postmenopausal Osteoporosis

    Rene Rizzoli;Jean-Yves Reginster;Steven Boonen;Gerard Breart

Frequent Co-Authors

Anne Boland
Anne Boland University of Paris-Saclay
Joris R. Delanghe
Joris R. Delanghe Ghent University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring career paths in Medicine does not always require a traditional medical school route. There are several online nursing and healthcare programs in the USA that offer flexible and accelerated pathways for career advancement.

For nurses seeking the highest level of clinical expertise, shortest post master's dnp program options allow experienced professionals to earn their Doctor of Nursing Practice in less time. If you are looking for convenience and a user-friendly curriculum, consider these dnp online programs designed for busy working nurses.

Those interested in entering nursing quickly can benefit from a 9 month lpn program, which prepares students to become Licensed Practical Nurses in under a year. For nurses aiming to specialize in mental health, several shortest post master's pmhnp online programs provide a fast track to becoming a Psychiatric-Mental Health Nurse Practitioner.

These online pathways offer flexibility, accessibility, and accelerated timelines, making advanced healthcare careers more attainable for students with diverse backgrounds and commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Jean-Marc Kaufman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles