World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Jairo N. Fuertes publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jairo N. Fuertes between 1990 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jairo N. Fuertes published across 36 years, from 1990 to 2025, averaging 2 papers a year. Output peaked at 6 publications in 2011. 5 of the 73 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1990 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 6. Peak 6 publications in 2011. 1990: 1 publication 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 2 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 2 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 4 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 3 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 4 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 2 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 4 publications
1990 2025

73 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jairo N. Fuertes: publications per year, 1990 to 2025
Year Publications
1990 1
1991 1
1992 0
1993 1
1994 1
1995 1
1996 1
1997 0
1998 1
1999 2
2000 4
2001 3
2002 3
2003 1
2004 2
2005 2
2006 1
2007 4
2008 0
2009 1
2010 3
2011 6
2012 3
2013 3
2014 1
2015 4
2016 3
2017 4
2018 0
2019 6
2020 0
2021 2
2022 1
2023 2
2024 1
2025 4
Total 73
Download as CSV

Jairo N. Fuertes publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jairo N. Fuertes sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Jairo N. Fuertes D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jairo N. Fuertes sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jairo N. Fuertes is affiliated with Adelphi University in the United States and conducts research primarily within the field of psychology. Their work spans several subfields including clinical psychology, general health professions, social psychology, nephrology, and health.

The areas of focus in their research cover topics such as dialysis and renal disease management, family caregiving in mental illness, optimism, hope, and well-being, mental health treatment and access, clinical practice guidelines implementation, mental health and patient involvement, and psychiatric care and mental health services.

Their recent publications include the following:

  • Social Support, Caregivers, and Chronic Kidney Disease, 2021, Seminars in Nephrology
  • CKD Patients' Emotional Well-Being: An Examination of Their Psychological Stressors and Support Factors, 2025, Kidney and Dialysis

Other notable papers connected to the broader research environment around Fuertes's work include:

  • Broadening the evidentiary basis for clinical practice guidelines: Recommendations from qualitative psychotherapy researchers, 2024, American Psychologist
  • Psychological and relational factors in ESRD hemodialysis treatment in an underserved community, 2020, Patient Education and Counseling
  • Physicians' and Patients' Ratings of the Physician-Patient Working Alliance, Adherence, Satisfaction, and Treatment Outcome, 2021, Behavioral Medicine

Frequent collaborators with Jairo N. Fuertes include Sofia Rubinstein, Michael Moore, Heidi M. Levitt, Olivia Friedman, and Prachi Anand.

Their work has been published in a range of specialized venues including:

  • American Psychologist
  • Seminars in Nephrology
  • Patient Education and Counseling
  • Kidney and Dialysis
  • Behavioral Medicine

Best Publications

  • Appreciating similarities and valuing differences : The Miville-Guzman Universality-Diversity scale

    Marie L. Miville;Charles J. Gelso;Raji Pannu;Will Liu

  • The physician–patient working alliance

    Jairo N. Fuertes;Alexa Mislowack;Jennifer Bennett;Laury Paul

  • Factor Structure and Short Form of the Miville-Guzman Universality-Diversity Scale

    Jairo N. Fuertes;Marie L. Miville;Jonathan J. Mohr;William E. Sedlacek

  • A meta-analysis of the effects of speakers' accents on interpersonal evaluations

    Jairo N. Fuertes;William H. Gottdiener;William H. Gottdiener;Helena Martin;Tracey C. Gilbert

  • Models of multicultural counseling.

    Joseph G. Ponterotto;Jairo N. Fuertes;Eric C. Chen

  • The role of patient attachment and working alliance on patient adherence, satisfaction, and health-related quality of life in lupus treatment.

    Jennifer K. Bennett;Jairo N. Fuertes;Merle Keitel;Robert Phillips

  • Clients' ratings of counselor multicultural competency.

    Jairo N. Fuertes;Karen Brobst

  • Self‐Efficacy, Self‐Rated Abilities, Adjustment, and Academic Performance

    Peggy Brady-Amoon;Jairo N. Fuertes

  • Therapist multicultural competency: A study of therapy dyads.

    Jairo N. Fuertes;Thomas I. Stracuzzi;Jennifer Bennett;Jennifer Scheinholtz

  • Measuring the Real Relationship in Psychotherapy: Initial Validation of the Therapist Form

    Charles J. Gelso;Frances A. Kelley;Jairo N. Fuertes;Cheri Marmarosh

  • Using the SAT and Noncognitive Variables to Predict the Grades and Retention of Asian American University Students.

    Jairo N. Fuertes

  • The physician-patient working alliance: Theory, research, and future possibilities.

    Jairo N. Fuertes;Arielle Toporovsky;Mariela Reyes;Jennifer Bennett Osborne

  • Multicultural Counseling Competencies 2003: Association for Multicultural Counseling and Development

    Gargi Roysircar;Patricia Arredondo;Jairo N. Fuertes;Joseph G. Ponterotto

  • Attachment, Coping, Acculturative Stress, and Quality of Life among Haitian Immigrants

    Lonette S. Belizaire;Lonette S. Belizaire;Jairo N. Fuertes

  • Correlates of the real relationship in psychotherapy: A study of dyads

    Jairo N. Fuertes;Alexa Mislowack;Sarah Brown;Shoval Gur-Arie

  • Using the Social, Attitudinal, Familial, and Environmental (S.A.F.E.) Acculturation Stress Scale to Assess the Adjustment Needs of Hispanic College Students.

    Jairo N. Fuertes;Franklin D. Westbrook

  • The real relationship inventory: development and psychometric investigation of the client form.

    Frances A. Kelley;Charles J. Gelso;Jairo N. Fuertes;Cheri Marmarosh

  • Future Research Directions in the Study of Counselor Multicultural Competency

    Jairo N. Fuertes;Maria Bartolomeo;C. Matthew Nichols

  • Effects of speech accents on interpersonal evaluations: implications for counseling practice and research.

    Jairo N. Fuertes;Jodi C. Potere;Karen Y. Ramirez

  • An Investigation of European American Therapists’ Approach to Counseling African American Clients

    Jairo N. Fuertes;Lisa N. Mueller;Rahul V. Chauhan;Jessica A. Walker

Frequent Co-Authors

Charles J. Gelso
Charles J. Gelso University of Maryland, College Park
William E. Sedlacek
William E. Sedlacek University of Maryland, College Park
Jonathan J. Mohr
Jonathan J. Mohr University of Maryland, College Park
Marvin R. Goldfried
Marvin R. Goldfried Stony Brook University
Joseph G. Ponterotto
Joseph G. Ponterotto Fordham University
Louis G. Castonguay
Louis G. Castonguay Pennsylvania State University
Linda C. Sobell
Linda C. Sobell Nova Southeastern University
Michelle G. Newman
Michelle G. Newman Pennsylvania State University
Jesse Owen
Jesse Owen University of Denver
Howard Giles
Howard Giles University of California, Santa Barbara

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're considering a career in psychology, exploring online degrees and various pathways can expand your opportunities in the field. Online psychology programs offer flexible learning, allowing students to gain essential knowledge while balancing work or family commitments. These degrees can prepare you for roles in schools, workplaces, or clinical settings.

One popular direction is becoming a mental health counselor. Each state has unique requirements, so it’s important to understand your region's specifics. For example, learn how to become a mental health counselor in Henderson or explore the pathway of how to become a mental health counselor in Honolulu. Similarly, you can review the steps on how to become a mental health counselor in Houston.

Educational requirements can also vary. For further information, see the Huntsville mental health counselor education requirements to get an idea of typical program prerequisites.

With a wide range of online options, it's easier than ever to start your journey, no matter where you live.

Best Scientists Citing Jairo N. Fuertes

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles