World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 74 4598 4175 338 312 365 24260

Ute Resch-Genger publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ute Resch-Genger between 1998 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ute Resch-Genger published across 29 years, from 1998 to 2026, averaging 15.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 42 publications in 2022. 22 of the 443 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 42. Peak 42 publications in 2022. 1998: 4 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 13 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 6 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 16 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 17 publications 2012: 19 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 20 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 24 publications 2018: 29 publications 2019: 37 publications 2020: 33 publications 2021: 27 publications 2022: 42 publications 2023: 30 publications 2024: 21 publications 2025: 21 publications 2026: 1 publication
1998 2026

443 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ute Resch-Genger: publications per year, 1998 to 2026
Year Publications
1998 4
1999 2
2000 13
2001 2
2002 2
2003 1
2004 1
2005 6
2006 8
2007 6
2008 16
2009 8
2010 9
2011 17
2012 19
2013 15
2014 15
2015 20
2016 14
2017 24
2018 29
2019 37
2020 33
2021 27
2022 42
2023 30
2024 21
2025 21
2026 1
Total 443
Download as CSV

Ute Resch-Genger publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ute Resch-Genger sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 361–380 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 365 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918
141–160 1,218
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522 365
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Ute Resch-Genger D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ute Resch-Genger sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 74–75 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501 74
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Ute Resch-Genger is affiliated with the Federal Institute For Materials Research and Testing in Germany. Their primary research focus is in the field of Materials Science, with extensive contributions spanning several subfields including Materials Chemistry, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, Spectroscopy, and Molecular Biology.

The main topics of their research encompass:

  • Luminescence and Fluorescent Materials
  • Luminescence Properties of Advanced Materials
  • Crystallization and Solubility Studies
  • X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography
  • Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties
  • Molecular Sensors and Ion Detection
  • Nanocluster Synthesis and Applications

Ute Resch-Genger has published research papers in a variety of venues, with frequent contributions to:

  • The Cambridge Structural Database
  • Scientific Reports
  • Chemistry - A European Journal
  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry

Notable recent papers include:

  • Targeted multicolor in vivo imaging over 1,000 nm enabled by nonamethine cyanines, 2022, Nature Methods
  • Strongly Red-Emissive Molecular Ruby [Cr(bpmp)2]3+ Surpasses [Ru(bpy)3]2+, 2021, Journal of the American Chemical Society
  • Citric Acid Based Carbon Dots with Amine Type Stabilizers: pH-Specific Luminescence and Quantum Yield Characteristics, 2020, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
  • High-Resolution Shortwave Infrared Imaging of Vascular Disorders Using Gold Nanoclusters, 2020, ACS Nano
  • Efficient Triplet-Triplet Annihilation Upconversion Sensitized by a Chromium(III) Complex via an Underexplored Energy Transfer Mechanism, 2022, Angewandte Chemie International Edition

The scientist collaborates frequently with peers such as Christian Würth, K. David Wegner, Katja Heinze, Nithiya Nirmalananthan-Budau, and Elina Andresen. These collaborations reflect a sustained engagement with researchers specializing in related domains.

Best Publications

  • Quantum dots versus organic dyes as fluorescent labels

    Ute Resch-Genger;Markus Grabolle;Sara Cavaliere-Jaricot;Roland Nitschke

  • Relative and absolute determination of fluorescence quantum yields of transparent samples

    Christian Würth;Markus Grabolle;Jutta Pauli;Monika Spieles

  • A Selective and Sensitive Fluoroionophore for HgII, AgI, and CuII with Virtually Decoupled Fluorophore and Receptor Units

    Knut Rurack;Matthias Kollmannsberger;† and Ute Resch-Genger;Jörg Daub

  • Determination of the Fluorescence Quantum Yield of Quantum Dots: Suitable Procedures and Achievable Uncertainties

    Markus Grabolle;Monika Spieles;Vladimir Lesnyak;Nikolai Gaponik

  • Rigidization, preorientation and electronic decoupling—the ‘magic triangle’ for the design of highly efficient fluorescent sensors and switches

    Knut Rurack;Ute Resch-Genger

  • Ultrafast Charge Transfer in Amino-Substituted Boron Dipyrromethene Dyes and Its Inhibition by Cation Complexation: A New Design Concept for Highly Sensitive Fluorescent Probes

    Matthias Kollmannsberger;Knut Rurack;Ute Resch-Genger;Jörg Daub

  • NaYF4 :Yb,Er/NaYF4 Core/Shell Nanocrystals with High Upconversion Luminescence Quantum Yield.

    Christian Homann;Lisa Krukewitt;Florian Frenzel;Bettina Grauel

  • Quenching of the upconversion luminescence of NaYF4:Yb3+,Er3+ and NaYF4:Yb3+,Tm3+ nanophosphors by water: the role of the sensitizer Yb3+ in non-radiative relaxation

    Riikka Arppe;Iko Hyppänen;Niina Perälä;Riikka Peltomaa

  • Redox Switchable Fluorescent Probe Selective for Either Hg(II) or Cd(II) and Zn(II)

    Gunther Hennrich;and Helmut Sonnenschein;† Ute Resch-Genger

  • Water dispersible upconverting nanoparticles: effects of surface modification on their luminescence and colloidal stability

    Stefan Wilhelm;Martin Kaiser;Christian Würth;Josef Heiland

  • Quantum Yields, Surface Quenching, and Passivation Efficiency for Ultrasmall Core/Shell Upconverting Nanoparticles

    Christian Würth;Stefan Fischer;Bettina Grauel;A. Paul Alivisatos

  • Comparison of Methods and Achievable Uncertainties for the Relative and Absolute Measurement of Photoluminescence Quantum Yields

    Christian Würth;Markus Grabolle;Jutta Pauli;Monika Spieles

  • [Cr(ddpd)2]3+: A Molecular, Water‐Soluble, Highly NIR‐Emissive Ruby Analogue

    Sven Otto;Markus Grabolle;Christoph Förster;Christoph Kreitner

  • Particle-Size-Dependent Förster Resonance Energy Transfer from Upconversion Nanoparticles to Organic Dyes

    Verena Muhr;Christian Würth;Marco Kraft;Markus Buchner

  • Determination of the Critical Micelle Concentration of Neutral and Ionic Surfactants with Fluorometry, Conductometry, and Surface Tension—A Method Comparison

    Norman Scholz;Thomas Behnke;Ute Resch-Genger

  • Near-Infrared Dyes for High Technology Applications

    Siegfried Daehne;Ute Resch-Genger;Otto S. Wolfbeis

  • Chalcone-Analogue Dyes Emitting in the Near-Infrared (NIR): Influence of Donor−Acceptor Substitution and Cation Complexation on Their Spectroscopic Properties and X-ray Structure

    Knut Rurack;Julia L. Bricks;Günter Reck;Reiner Radeglia

  • Power-dependent upconversion quantum yield of NaYF4:Yb3+,Er3+ nano- and micrometer-sized particles – measurements and simulations

    Martin Kaiser;Christian Würth;Marco Kraft;Iko Hyppänen

  • Determination of the Photoluminescence Quantum Yield of Dilute Dye Solutions (IUPAC Technical Report)

    Ute Resch-Genger;Knut Rurack

  • Image-guided, targeted and triggered drug delivery to tumors using polymer-based microbubbles.

    Stanley Fokong;Benjamin Theek;Zhuojun Wu;Patrick Koczera

  • Cation-triggered ‘switching on’ of the red/near infra-red (NIR) fluorescence of rigid fluorophore–spacer–receptor ionophores

    Knut Rurack;Ute Resch-Genger;Julia L. Bricks;Monika Spieles

Frequent Co-Authors

Katja Heinze
Katja Heinze Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz
Knut Rurack
Knut Rurack Federal Institute For Materials Research and Testing
Wolfgang Rettig
Wolfgang Rettig Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Thomas Nann
Thomas Nann University of Newcastle Australia
Roland Nitschke
Roland Nitschke University of Freiburg
Tero Soukka
Tero Soukka University of Turku
Thomas J. J. Müller
Thomas J. J. Müller Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in pursuing a career related to Chemistry in the USA, exploring specialized fields such as forensic science and criminal justice can be highly rewarding. Many students seek affordable options, and programs like forensic science degree online offer a flexible way to gain critical knowledge without the need for on-campus attendance.

Further specialization can be achieved through graduate studies, with options such as an online masters forensic psychology program that blends psychological insights with forensic principles. Such degrees open doors to careers that require a deep understanding of both science and human behavior.

Career opportunities in forensic fields are not only intellectually stimulating but can also be financially rewarding. Those interested should research high paying jobs in forensics to better understand the potential paths and earning possibilities.

Cost is often a significant concern for students, and evaluating aspects like criminal justice degree tuition is essential when planning your education budget. Many online options provide affordable tuition rates without compromising quality, making these programs accessible to a wider range of learners.

Best Scientists Citing Ute Resch-Genger

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles