World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
34
Citations
6944
World Ranking
9269
National Ranking
157

Luis Carretié publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Luis Carretié sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 104 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Luis Carretié D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Luis Carretié sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Luis Carretié is a researcher affiliated with the Autonomous University of Madrid in Spain, specializing in the field of neuroscience. Their work encompasses a range of topics within neuroscience, with a strong focus on cognitive neuroscience.

The scientist's research spans several main topics including:

  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Neural and behavioral psychology studies
  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Memory and neural mechanisms
  • EEG and brain-computer interfaces
  • Neuroscience and neuropharmacology research
  • Menstrual health and disorders

In terms of subfields, Luis Carretié's publications predominantly address cognitive neuroscience, with additional contributions in social psychology, cellular and molecular neuroscience, public health, environmental and occupational health, and physiology.

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Uxía Fernández-Folgueiras
  • Dominique Kessel
  • Fátima Álvarez
  • Constantino Méndez-Bértolo
  • Manuel Tapia

Research outputs are often published in venues such as:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Psychophysiology
  • Hormones and Behavior
  • Preprints.org
  • International Journal of Psychophysiology

Among recent papers authored or coauthored by Luis Carretié are:

  • "The Missing Link in Early Emotional Processing" (2021), published in Emotion Review
  • "Fast unconscious processing of emotional stimuli in early stages of the visual cortex" (2021), published in Cerebral Cortex
  • "Prejudice drives exogenous attention to outgroups" (2020), published in Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
  • "Suppression of alpha-band power underlies exogenous attention to emotional distractors" (2022), published in Psychophysiology
  • "Pain E-motion Faces Database (PEMF): Pain-related micro-clips for emotion research" (2022), published in Behavior Research Methods

Best Publications

  • Emotion, attention, and the 'negativity bias', studied through event-related potentials.

    Luis Carretié;Francisco Mercado;Manuel Tapia;José A. Hinojosa

  • Automatic attention to emotional stimuli: neural correlates.

    Luis Carretié;José A. Hinojosa;Manuel Martín-Loeches;Francisco Mercado

  • N170 sensitivity to facial expression: A meta-analysis

    J.A. Hinojosa;F. Mercado;L. Carretié

  • Exogenous (automatic) attention to emotional stimuli: a review

    Luis Carretié

  • Emotion and Attention Interaction Studied through Event-Related Potentials

    Luis Carretié;Manuel Martín-loeches;José Antonio Hinojosa;Francisco Mercado

  • Emotional context modulates response inhibition: Neural and behavioral data

    Jacobo Albert;Sara López-Martín;Luis Carretié

  • Negative brain: an integrative review on the neural processes activated by unpleasant stimuli.

    Luis Carretié;Jacobo Albert;Sara López-Martín;Manuel Tapia

  • Electrophysiological differences in the processing of affective information in words and pictures.

    José A. Hinojosa;Luis Carretié;María A. Valcárcel;Constantino Méndez-Bértolo

  • Spatiotemporal characterization of response inhibition

    Jacobo Albert;Sara López-Martín;José Antonio Hinojosa;Luis Carretié

  • Cortical response to subjectively unconscious danger.

    Luis Carretié;José Antonio Hinojosa;Francisco Mercado;Manuel Tapia

  • Modulation of ongoing cognitive processes by emotionally intense words.

    Luis Carretié;José A. Hinojosa;Jacobo Albert;Sara López-Martín

  • N300, P300 and the emotional processing of visual stimuli

    L. Carretié;J. Iglesias;T. García;M. Ballesteros

  • Cerebral patterns of attentional habituation to emotional visual stimuli

    Luis Carretié;José Antonio Hinojosa;Francisco Mercado

  • An ERP study on the specificity of facial expression processing.

    Luis Carretié;Jaime Iglesias

  • Neural response to sustained affective visual stimulation using an indirect task

    Luis Carretié;José Antonio Hinojosa;Jacobo Albert;Francisco Mercado

  • Neural activity associated with metaphor comprehension: spatial analysis.

    María Sotillo;Luis Carretié;José A. Hinojosa;Manuel Tapia

  • An electrophysiological study on the interaction between emotional content and spatial frequency of visual stimuli

    Luis Carretié;José A. Hinojosa;Sara López-Martín;Manuel Tapia

  • Decomposing unpleasantness: Differential exogenous attention to disgusting and fearful stimuli

    L. Carretié;E. Ruiz-Padial;S. López-Martín;J. Albert

  • Alteraciones emocionales en el trastorno por déficit de atención/hiperactividad: datos existentes y cuestiones abiertas.

    Albert J;López-Martín S;Fernández-Jaén A;Carretié L

  • The role of the anterior cingulate cortex in emotional response inhibition.

    Jacobo Albert;Jacobo Albert;Sara López-Martín;Manuel Tapia;Daniel Montoya

Frequent Co-Authors

José A. Hinojosa
José A. Hinojosa Complutense University of Madrid
Manuel Martín-Loeches
Manuel Martín-Loeches Complutense University of Madrid
Roberto Colom
Roberto Colom Autonomous University of Madrid
Elizabeth Kuipers
Elizabeth Kuipers King's College London
Juliana Onwumere
Juliana Onwumere King's College London
Morten Overgaard
Morten Overgaard Aarhus University
Yuejia Luo
Yuejia Luo Shenzhen University
Veena Kumari
Veena Kumari Brunel University London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience in the USA opens doors to a range of related online degrees and diverse career pathways. Many students combine neuroscience with fields like psychology, social work, or therapy to expand their opportunities.

For those interested in counseling or clinical work, earning a marriage and family therapist degree is a popular option. This path prepares graduates for roles supporting families and individuals in mental health settings.

The accessibility of online education continues to grow, with numerous most affordable online psychology degree programs available. These degrees provide foundational knowledge in human behavior and can complement neuroscience studies.

Advanced credentials, such as an online masters psychology degree, can sharpen specialized expertise, support research ambitions, and lead to higher-level positions.

Social work is another frequent pairing with neuroscience, especially for those passionate about advocacy. If you’re wondering how long does it take to get a msw online, many programs offer flexible timelines, from accelerated to part-time, to fit various career goals.

These online options make it easier than ever to create a personalized educational journey, combining neuroscience with complementary disciplines to enhance career prospects.

Best Scientists Citing Luis Carretié

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles