World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
43
Citations
7534
World Ranking
7272
National Ranking
82

Neuroscience

D-Index
44
Citations
7589
World Ranking
7169
National Ranking
116

José A. Hinojosa publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where José A. Hinojosa sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 136 publications — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

José A. Hinojosa D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where José A. Hinojosa sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

José A. Hinojosa is affiliated with the Complutense University of Madrid in Spain and has a research focus primarily within the fields of Psychology and Neuroscience. Their work spans subfields including Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, and Language and Linguistics.

The research topics covered by José A. Hinojosa include:

  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Categorization, perception, and language

They have contributed frequently to several publication venues, notably:

  • Behavior Research Methods
  • Language Cognition and Neuroscience
  • Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  • Cognition & Emotion
  • Frontiers in Psychology

Some of their recent publications include:

  • #EEGManyLabs: Investigating the replicability of influential EEG experiments (2021, Cortex)
  • A multi-lab test of the facial feedback hypothesis by the Many Smiles Collaboration (2022, Nature Human Behaviour)
  • EmoPro - Emotional prototypicality for 1286 Spanish words: Relationships with affective and psycholinguistic variables (2021, Behavior Research Methods)
  • Visual awareness and the levels of processing hypothesis: A critical review (2020, Consciousness and Cognition)
  • Gut microbiota and voluntary alcohol consumption (2022, Translational Psychiatry)

José A. Hinojosa's frequent co-authors include:

  • Pilar Ferré
  • Pedro R. Montoro
  • Juan Haro
  • Jacobo Albert
  • Claudia Poch

Best Publications

  • Emotion, attention, and the 'negativity bias', studied through event-related potentials.

    Luis Carretié;Francisco Mercado;Manuel Tapia;José A. Hinojosa

  • Automatic attention to emotional stimuli: neural correlates.

    Luis Carretié;José A. Hinojosa;Manuel Martín-Loeches;Francisco Mercado

  • N170 sensitivity to facial expression: A meta-analysis

    J.A. Hinojosa;F. Mercado;L. Carretié

  • Emotion and Attention Interaction Studied through Event-Related Potentials

    Luis Carretié;Manuel Martín-loeches;José Antonio Hinojosa;Francisco Mercado

  • Looking at emotional words is not the same as reading emotional words: Behavioral and neural correlates

    José A. Hinojosa;Constantino Méndez‐Bértolo;Miguel A. Pozo

  • Electrophysiological differences in the processing of affective information in words and pictures.

    José A. Hinojosa;Luis Carretié;María A. Valcárcel;Constantino Méndez-Bértolo

  • Spatiotemporal characterization of response inhibition

    Jacobo Albert;Sara López-Martín;José Antonio Hinojosa;Luis Carretié

  • Cortical response to subjectively unconscious danger.

    Luis Carretié;José Antonio Hinojosa;Francisco Mercado;Manuel Tapia

  • Modulation of ongoing cognitive processes by emotionally intense words.

    Luis Carretié;José A. Hinojosa;Jacobo Albert;Sara López-Martín

  • Affective neurolinguistics: towards a framework for reconciling language and emotion

    J. A. Hinojosa;E. M. Moreno;P. Ferré

  • Cerebral patterns of attentional habituation to emotional visual stimuli

    Luis Carretié;José Antonio Hinojosa;Francisco Mercado

  • Affective norms of 875 Spanish words for five discrete emotional categories and two emotional dimensions

    J. A. Hinojosa;N. Martínez-García;C. Villalba-García;U. Fernández-Folgueiras

  • Neural response to sustained affective visual stimulation using an indirect task

    Luis Carretié;José Antonio Hinojosa;Jacobo Albert;Francisco Mercado

  • Neural activity associated with metaphor comprehension: spatial analysis.

    María Sotillo;Luis Carretié;José A. Hinojosa;Manuel Tapia

  • An electrophysiological study on the interaction between emotional content and spatial frequency of visual stimuli

    Luis Carretié;José A. Hinojosa;Sara López-Martín;Manuel Tapia

  • #EEGManyLabs : investigating the replicability of influential EEG experiments

    Yuri G. Pavlov;Nika Adamian;Stefan Appelhoff;Mahnaz Arvaneh

  • The Recognition Potential: An ERP Index of Lexical Access ☆

    Manuel Martín-Loeches;José A. Hinojosa;Gregorio Gómez-Jarabo;Francisco J. Rubia

  • A multi-lab test of the facial feedback hypothesis by the Many Smiles Collaboration.

    Unknown

  • An early electrophysiological sign of semantic processing in basal extrastriate areas.

    Manuel Martín-Loeches;Manuel Martín-Loeches;José A. Hinojosa;Gregorio Gómez-Jarabo;Francisco J. Rubia

  • Arousal contributions to affective priming: electrophysiological correlates.

    José A. Hinojosa;Luis Carretié;Constantino Méndez-Bértolo;Arturo Míguez

  • Valence-related vigilance biases in anxiety studied through event-related potentials

    Luis Carretié;Francisco Mercado;José A. Hinojosa;Manuel Martı́n-Loeches

  • Event-related potentials and semantics: an overview and an integrative proposal.

    José A. Hinojosa;Manuel Martı́n-Loeches;Francisco J. Rubia

Frequent Co-Authors

Manuel Martín-Loeches
Manuel Martín-Loeches Complutense University of Madrid
Luis Carretié
Luis Carretié Autonomous University of Madrid
Jon Andoni Duñabeitia
Jon Andoni Duñabeitia Nebrija University
Edelyn Verona
Edelyn Verona University of South Florida
Michael Inzlicht
Michael Inzlicht University of Toronto
Marc Brysbaert
Marc Brysbaert Ghent University
Annmarie MacNamara
Annmarie MacNamara Texas A&M University
Joel S. Snyder
Joel S. Snyder University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Giorgio Ganis
Giorgio Ganis Plymouth University
Cecile D. Ladouceur
Cecile D. Ladouceur University of Pittsburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in Neuroscience opens doors to diverse opportunities in health, research, and behavioral sciences. Many students explore additional academic pathways to broaden their skills and enhance employment options. Today, pursuing online courses with certificates is a popular route, allowing learners to specialize in related fields such as cognitive psychology, mental health support, or medical technology.

Flexibility is key for many, making online courses appealing for those balancing work, family, or other responsibilities. For those seeking a meaningful career in social work, the cheapest cswe-accredited online msw programs offer an affordable pathway to become a licensed clinical social worker—a common complement to neuroscience backgrounds.

Similarly, roles in behavioral analysis are highly relevant. The cheapest bcba online program helps students meet the requirements for Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA) certification, blending neuroscience knowledge with applied behavioral intervention. Exploring these online degrees creates new opportunities—both for professional growth and for making a real-world impact.

Best Scientists Citing José A. Hinojosa

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles