World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 39 8644 8076 74 72 119 5296

Hong Li publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Hong Li between 2005 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Hong Li published across 22 years, from 2005 to 2026, averaging 11.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 39 publications in 2023. 40 of the 260 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 39. Peak 39 publications in 2023. 2005: 2 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 16 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 17 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 31 publications 2023: 39 publications 2024: 30 publications 2025: 35 publications 2026: 5 publications
2005 2026

260 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Hong Li: publications per year, 2005 to 2026
Year Publications
2005 2
2006 2
2007 9
2008 12
2009 16
2010 8
2011 10
2012 14
2013 17
2014 6
2015 8
2016 6
2017 3
2018 2
2019 0
2020 3
2021 2
2022 31
2023 39
2024 30
2025 35
2026 5
Total 260
Download as CSV

Hong Li publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hong Li sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 111–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 119 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686 119
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Hong Li D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hong Li sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641 39
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Cognition
  • Neuroscience
  • Social psychology

Hong Li mainly focuses on Developmental psychology, Event-related potential, Cognition, Categorization and Valence. His Developmental psychology study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Stimulus and Cognitive psychology. As a member of one scientific family, he mostly works in the field of Event-related potential, focusing on Electrophysiology and, on occasion, Posterior cingulate and Anterior cingulate cortex.

His Cognition study incorporates themes from Handwriting and Motor control. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Negativity bias, Emotion recognition, Facial affect and Human brain. His studies in Valence integrate themes in fields like Right prefrontal cortex and Salience.

His most cited work include:

  • Are we sensitive to valence differences in emotionally negative stimuli? Electrophysiological evidence from an ERP study. (167 citations)
  • Are we sensitive to valence differences in emotionally negative stimuli? Electrophysiological evidence from an ERP study. (167 citations)
  • Gender differences in behavioral inhibitory control: ERP evidence from a two-choice oddball task (107 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His primary scientific interests are in Developmental psychology, Event-related potential, Stimulus, Cognition and Cognitive psychology. The concepts of his Developmental psychology study are interwoven with issues in Valence, Oddball paradigm, Neural correlates of consciousness and Salience. His Event-related potential study combines topics in areas such as Posterior cingulate, Electrophysiology, Categorization and Mood.

His Stimulus study is focused on Neuroscience in general. His research in Cognition intersects with topics in Negative emotion, Prospection and Positive emotion. He integrates several fields in his works, including Cognitive psychology and Intertemporal choice.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Developmental psychology (71.88%)
  • Event-related potential (43.75%)
  • Stimulus (43.75%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2012-2013)?

  • Cognitive psychology (43.75%)
  • Correlation (12.50%)
  • Stimulus (43.75%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Hong Li focuses on Cognitive psychology, Correlation, Stimulus, N2pc and Developmental psychology. His work carried out in the field of Cognitive psychology brings together such families of science as Negative emotion, Prospection, Cognition and Positive emotion. His Correlation research incorporates a variety of disciplines, including Visual search, Salience, Neural correlates of consciousness, Reward sensitivity and Meridian.

Between 2012 and 2013, his most popular works were:

  • Neural correlates of reward-driven attentional capture in visual search (71 citations)
  • Neural correlates of reward-driven attentional capture in visual search (71 citations)
  • The Value of Emotion: How Does Episodic Prospection Modulate Delay Discounting? (56 citations)

Best Publications

  • Are we sensitive to valence differences in emotionally negative stimuli? Electrophysiological evidence from an ERP study.

    Jiajin Yuan;Qinglin Zhang;Qinglin Zhang;Antao Chen;Antao Chen;Hong Li;Hong Li

  • Gender differences in behavioral inhibitory control: ERP evidence from a two-choice oddball task

    Jiajin Yuan;Yuanyuan He;Yuanyuan He;Zhang Qinglin;Zhang Qinglin;Antao Chen;Antao Chen

  • Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment deteriorate fine movement control.

    Jin H. Yan;Susan Rountree;Paul Massman;Rachelle Smith Doody

  • The Value of Emotion: How Does Episodic Prospection Modulate Delay Discounting?

    Lei Liu;Lei Liu;Tingyong Feng;Tingyong Feng;Jing Chen;Hong Li

  • The neural basis of insight problem solving: an event-related potential study.

    Jiang Qiu;Hong Li;Dong Yang;Yuejia Luo

  • Neural correlates of the "Aha" experiences: evidence from an fMRI study of insight problem solving.

    Jiang Qiu;Hong Li;Hong Li;Jerwen Jou;Jia Liu

  • The neural mechanism underlying the female advantage in identifying negative emotions: an event-related potential study.

    Hong Li;Jiajin Yuan;Chongde Lin

  • Musical training induces functional plasticity in perceptual and motor networks: insights from resting-state FMRI.

    Cheng Luo;Zhi-wei Guo;Yong-xiu Lai;Wei Liao

  • Experiencing a Natural Disaster Alters Children’s Altruistic Giving

    Yiyuan Li;Yiyuan Li;Hong Li;Jean Decety;Kang Lee

  • The influence of the diffusion of responsibility effect on outcome evaluations: electrophysiological evidence from an ERP study.

    Peng Li;Peng Li;Shiwei Jia;Tingyong Feng;Tingyong Feng;Qiang Liu;Qiang Liu

  • Neural correlates of the females' susceptibility to negative emotions: an insight into gender-related prevalence of affective disturbances.

    Jiajin Yuan;Jiajin Yuan;Yuejia Luo;Jin H. Yan;Xianxin Meng;Xianxin Meng

  • Neural correlates of reward-driven attentional capture in visual search

    Senqing Qi;Senqing Qi;Qinghong Zeng;Cody Ding;Cody Ding;Hong Li;Hong Li

  • Electrophysiological correlates of processing facial attractiveness and its influence on cooperative behavior.

    Jie Chen;Jun Zhong;Youxue Zhang;Peng Li

  • Are children's faces really more appealing than those of adults? Testing the baby schema hypothesis beyond infancy.

    Li Zhuo Luo;Hong Li;Hong Li;Kang Lee;Kang Lee

  • The impact of auditory working memory training on the fronto-parietal working memory network

    Julia A. Schneiders;Bertram Opitz;Huijun Tang;Yuan Deng

  • Adapting to the destitute situations: poverty cues lead to short-term choice.

    Lei Liu;Tingyong Feng;Tingyong Feng;Tao Suo;Kang Lee

  • Temporal features of the degree effect in self-relevance: Neural correlates

    Jie Chen;Jiajin Yuan;Tingyong Feng;Antao Chen

  • Pleasant mood intensifies brain processing of cognitive control: ERP correlates.

    Jiajin Yuan;Shuang Xu;Shuang Xu;Jiemin Yang;Jiemin Yang;Qiang Liu;Qiang Liu

  • The Timing of Cognitive Control in Partially Incongruent Categorization

    Antao Chen;Peng Xu;Quanhong Wang;Yuejia Luo

  • Accessible cultural mind-set modulates default mode activity: Evidence for the culturally situated brain

    Chenbo Wang;Daphna Oyserman;Qiang Liu;Hong Li

Frequent Co-Authors

Tingyong Feng
Tingyong Feng Southwest University
Qiang Liu
Qiang Liu Chinese Academy of Sciences
Qinglin Zhang
Qinglin Zhang Southwest University
Yuejia Luo
Yuejia Luo Shenzhen University
Kang Lee
Kang Lee University of Toronto
Dezhong Yao
Dezhong Yao University of Electronic Science and Technology of China
Jiang Qiu
Jiang Qiu Southwest University
Axel Mecklinger
Axel Mecklinger Saarland University
Xiaolin Zhou
Xiaolin Zhou Peking University
Yuan Deng
Yuan Deng Beihang University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing to study psychology opens doors to a wide range of career opportunities, from clinical practice to research, counseling, and organizational roles. Online psychology degree programs in the USA offer flexibility for students balancing work, family, or geographical limitations, making high-quality education more accessible than ever.

Students interested in graduate studies can explore the best online master's in psychology degree programs ranking in Kansas, which highlight programs known for strong faculty and comprehensive student support. For those seeking study options on the East Coast, the best online psychology master's program rankings in New York list top graduate opportunities throughout the state.

Undergraduate and graduate psychology students alike can benefit from exploring online psychology degrees in Pennsylvania, where many universities offer flexible pathways preparing graduates for licensure or further study. Additionally, those based in California or interested in West Coast programs can review the best online psychology degree rankings in San Diego to identify leading local options in the field.

By selecting an accredited online program that matches your career goals, you can set yourself up for success in a wide variety of psychology-related professions.

Best Scientists Citing Hong Li

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles