World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 32 10945 10242 5717 5219 67 4058

Anna Abraham publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Anna Abraham between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Anna Abraham published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 3.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 2025. 15 of the 88 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 2025. 2003: 2 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 6 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 1 publication 2011: 0 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 9 publications
2003 2025

88 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Anna Abraham: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 2
2004 0
2005 3
2006 1
2007 6
2008 6
2009 1
2010 1
2011 0
2012 6
2013 4
2014 7
2015 6
2016 4
2017 0
2018 7
2019 5
2020 3
2021 2
2022 5
2023 4
2024 6
2025 9
Total 88
Download as CSV

Anna Abraham publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anna Abraham sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 61–70 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 67 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299 67
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Anna Abraham D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anna Abraham sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32–33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702 32
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Anna Abraham is affiliated with the University of Georgia in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of psychology and neuroscience, with a notable focus on experimental and cognitive psychology as well as cognitive neuroscience. The subfields encompassed by their work include sociology and political science, social psychology, and clinical psychology.

The scientist's body of research includes several recent publications in various peer-reviewed journals. Among these are:

  • Conceptual expansion via novel metaphor processing: An ERP replication and extension study examining individual differences in creativity (2021) published in Brain and Language
  • Creativity or creativities? Why context matters (2021) published in Design Studies
  • Why the standard definition of creativity fails to capture the creative act (2024) published in Theory & Psychology

In addition to these, Anna Abraham has coauthored papers with frequent collaborators such as Sarah L. Asquith, Daniel Quintana, Harrison E. Chapman, and Xu Wang.

Their work covers multiple topics related to creativity and cognition, including:

  • Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
  • Mind wandering and attention
  • Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
  • Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function
  • Media Influence and Health
  • Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research

Anna Abraham frequently publishes in journals such as Imagination Cognition and Personality, BMC Psychology, Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts, The American Journal of Psychology, and Behavioral Sciences.

Best Publications

  • Attitudes Toward Violence Against Women: A Cross-Nation Study

    Madhabika B. Nayak;Christina A. Byrne;Mutsumi K. Martin;Anna George Abraham

  • Gender and creativity: an overview of psychological and neuroscientific literature

    Anna Abraham

  • Creativity and the brain: uncovering the neural signature of conceptual expansion.

    Anna Abraham;Karoline Pieritz;Kristin Thybusch;Barbara Rutter

  • Creative thinking as orchestrated by semantic processing vs. cognitive control brain networks.

    Anna Abraham

  • Thinking about the future versus the past in personal and non-personal contexts.

    Anna Abraham;Ricarda Ines Schubotz;D. Yves von Cramon

  • Gender differences in creative thinking: behavioral and fMRI findings

    Anna Abraham;Anna Abraham;Kristin Thybusch;Karoline Pieritz;Christiane Hermann

  • The promises and perils of the neuroscience of creativity

    Anna Abraham

  • Creative thinking in adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)

    Anna Abraham;Sabine Windmann;Rainer Siefen;Irene Daum

  • Conceptual expansion and creative imagery as a function of psychoticism.

    Anna Abraham;Sabine Windmann;Irene Daum;Onur Güntürkün

  • Creative cognition: The diverse operations and the prospect of applying a cognitive neuroscience perspective

    Anna Abraham;Sabine Windmann;Sabine Windmann

  • Semantic memory as the root of imagination.

    Anna Abraham;Andreja Bubic

  • The imaginative mind.

    Anna Abraham

  • Creative cognition and the brain: Dissociations between frontal, parietal-temporal and basal ganglia groups

    Anna Abraham;Susan Beudt;Derek V. M. Ott;D. Yves von Cramon

  • Meeting george bush versus meeting cinderella: The neural response when telling apart what is real from what is fictional in the context of our reality

    Anna Abraham;D. Yves von Cramon;Ricarda I. Schubotz

  • The Neuroscience of Creativity

    Anna Abraham

  • Can clouds dance? Part 2: an ERP investigation of passive conceptual expansion.

    Barbara Rutter;Sören Kröger;Holger Hill;Sabine Windmann

  • Reality = Relevance? Insights from spontaneous modulations of the brain's default network when telling apart reality from fiction

    Anna Abraham;Anna Abraham;D. Yves von Cramon

  • Creative thinking in schizophrenia: the role of executive dysfunction and symptom severity.

    Anna Abraham;Sabine Windmann;Peter McKenna;Onur Güntürkün

  • Selective Information Processing Advantages in Creative Cognition as a Function of Schizotypy

    Anna Abraham;Sabine Windmann

  • Matching mind to world and vice versa: Functional dissociations between belief and desire mental state processing.

    Anna Abraham;Anna Abraham;Hannes Rakoczy;Markus Werning;D. Yves von Cramon

  • Commentary: Creativity and Memory: Effects of an Episodic-Specificity Induction on Divergent Thinking

    Anna Abraham

Frequent Co-Authors

Christiane Hermann
Christiane Hermann University of Giessen
D. Yves von Cramon
D. Yves von Cramon Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences
Ricarda Ines Schubotz
Ricarda Ines Schubotz University of Münster
Onur Güntürkün
Onur Güntürkün Ruhr University Bochum
Irene Daum
Irene Daum Ruhr University Bochum
Rudolf Stark
Rudolf Stark University of Giessen
Hannes Rakoczy
Hannes Rakoczy University of Göttingen
Henk Aarts
Henk Aarts Utrecht University
Julian Paul Keenan
Julian Paul Keenan Montclair State University
Peter J. McKenna
Peter J. McKenna Fidmag Sisters Hospitallers

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens doors to a variety of related fields, especially in social work and counseling. Many careers require specialized education and licensure that differ from state to state.

If you are interested in working as a social worker, it's important to understand the Tennessee social work education requirements, which typically include both academic credentials and supervised experience. Similarly, understanding the Texas social work license requirements is crucial if you plan to practice in Texas, as they have their own processes for licensing and continuing education.

For those aiming to work in the western states, learning how to become a social worker in Utah can help you meet the specific standards that Utah employers expect. Likewise, those interested in the northeast must be aware of the distinct Vermont social work education requirements.

Online psychology programs often allow you to tailor your coursework to meet these requirements, preparing you for licensure and varied career pathways in mental health and social services across the country.

Best Scientists Citing Anna Abraham

Trending Scientists