World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Emmanuelle Volle

Emmanuelle Volle

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
42
Citations
7984
World Ranking
7601
National Ranking
352

Emmanuelle Volle publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emmanuelle Volle sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 83 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Emmanuelle Volle D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emmanuelle Volle sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Emmanuelle Volle is affiliated with Sorbonne University in France and focuses on research primarily in neuroscience and psychology, with a strong emphasis on cognitive neuroscience and experimental and cognitive psychology. A significant portion of their work intersects with the study of creativity, memory, and brain connectivity.

The scientist's research interests cover a broad range of topics including:

  • Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Mind Wandering and Attention
  • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function

Emmanuelle Volle has contributed to numerous papers, some of the more recent and cited works include:

  • Brain connectivity-based prediction of real-life creativity is mediated by semantic memory structure, 2022, Science Advances
  • An investigation of the cognitive and neural correlates of semantic memory search related to creative ability, 2022, Communications Biology
  • Network-level causal analysis of set-shifting during trail making test part B: A multimodal analysis of a glioma surgery case, 2020, Cortex
  • Multilingual semantic distance: Automatic verbal creativity assessment in many languages, 2023, Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts
  • How subjective idea valuation energizes and guides creative idea generation, 2023, American Psychologist

The scientist frequently publishes in venues such as:

  • Cortex
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Communications Biology
  • Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts
  • Communications Psychology

Collaboration is integral to Emmanuelle Volle's research. Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Marcela Ovando-Tellez
  • Théophile Bieth
  • Alizée Lopez-Persem
  • Yoed N. Kenett
  • Mathias Benedek

Overall, Emmanuelle Volle's body of work reflects a consistent engagement with understanding the neural and cognitive mechanisms underlying creativity, memory, and cognitive flexibility, grounded in neuroscience and psychology disciplines.

Best Publications

  • Functions of the left superior frontal gyrus in humans: a lesion study.

    Foucaud du Boisgueheneuc;Richard Levy;Richard Levy;Emmanuelle Volle;Emmanuelle Volle;Magali Seassau;Magali Seassau

  • Direct Evidence for a Parietal-Frontal Pathway Subserving Spatial Awareness in Humans

    Michel Thiebaut de Schotten;Marika Urbanski;Hugues Duffau;Emmanuelle Volle

  • Direct Intracranial, fMRI, and Lesion Evidence for the Causal Role of Left Inferotemporal Cortex in Reading

    Raphaël Gaillard;Lionel Naccache;Lionel Naccache;Philippe Pinel;Stéphane Clémenceau

  • Rostral and caudal prefrontal contribution to creativity: a meta-analysis of functional imaging data

    Gil Gonen-Yaacovi;Leonardo Cruz de Souza;Leonardo Cruz de Souza;Leonardo Cruz de Souza;Richard Levy;Marika Urbanski

  • Functional neuroimaging studies of prospective memory: what have we learnt so far?

    Paul W. Burgess;Gil Gonen-Yaacovi;Emmanuelle Volle

  • Atlasing the frontal lobe connections and their variability due to age and education: a spherical deconvolution tractography study

    K Rojkova;E Volle;M Urbanski;F Humbert

  • An improved neuroanatomical model of the default-mode network reconciles previous neuroimaging and neuropathological findings.

    Pedro Nascimento Alves;Chris Foulon;Chris Foulon;Chris Foulon;Vyacheslav Karolis;Vyacheslav Karolis;Vyacheslav Karolis;Danilo Bzdok

  • Advanced lesion symptom mapping analyses and implementation as BCBtoolkit.

    Chris Foulon;Chris Foulon;Leonardo Cerliani;Leonardo Cerliani;Serge Kinkingnéhun;Richard Levy

  • In search of the depressive self: extended medial prefrontal network during self-referential processing in major depression

    Cédric Lemogne;Guillaume le Bastard;Helen Mayberg;Emmanuelle Volle

  • The role of rostral prefrontal cortex in prospective memory: A voxel-based lesion study

    Emmanuelle Volle;Gil Gonen-Yaacovi;Angela de Lacy Costello;Sam J. Gilbert

  • Poor creativity in frontotemporal dementia: a window into the neural bases of the creative mind.

    Leonardo Cruz de Souza;Emmanuelle Volle;Maxime Bertoux;Maxime Bertoux;Maxime Bertoux;Virginie Czernecki;Virginie Czernecki;Virginie Czernecki

  • When I think about me and simulate you: Medial rostral prefrontal cortex and self-referential processes

    Roland G. Benoit;Roland G. Benoit;Sam J. Gilbert;Emmanuelle Volle;Paul W. Burgess

  • Self-referential processing and the prefrontal cortex over the course of depression: a pilot study.

    Cédric Lemogne;Helen Mayberg;Loretxu Bergouignan;Loretxu Bergouignan;Loretxu Bergouignan;Emmanuelle Volle

  • General and specialized brain correlates for analogical reasoning: A meta-analysis of functional imaging studies

    Lucie Hobeika;Capucine Diard-Detoeuf;Béatrice Garcin;Richard Levy

  • Visualization of disconnection syndromes in humans.

    Michel Thiebaut de Schotten;Serge Kinkingnéhun;Christine Delmaire;Stéphane Lehéricy

  • An investigation of the cognitive and neural correlates of semantic memory search related to creative ability

    Unknown

  • The Functional Architecture of the Left Posterior and Lateral Prefrontal Cortex in Humans

    Emmanuelle Volle;Serge Kinkingnéhun;Jean-Baptiste Pochon;Karl Mondon

  • Mesulam’s frontal lobe mystery re-examined.

    Paul W. Burgess;Nick Alderman;Emmanuelle Volle;Roland G. Benoit

  • Brain connectivity–based prediction of real-life creativity is mediated by semantic memory structure

    Unknown

  • Distinct functional connectivity associated with lateral versus medial rostral prefrontal cortex: A meta-analysis

    Sam J. Gilbert;Gil Gonen-Yaacovi;Roland G. Benoit;Emmanuelle Volle

  • Forced collectionism after orbitofrontal damage

    E. Volle;R. Beato;R. Levy;B. Dubois

  • Functional MR Imaging or Wada Test: Which Is the Better Predictor of Individual Postoperative Memory Outcome?

    Sophie Dupont;Emmanuelle Duron;Séverine Samson;Marisa Denos

Frequent Co-Authors

Michel Thiebaut de Schotten
Michel Thiebaut de Schotten University of Bordeaux
Bruno Dubois
Bruno Dubois Université Paris Cité
Paul W. Burgess
Paul W. Burgess University College London
Sam J. Gilbert
Sam J. Gilbert University College London
Yves Samson
Yves Samson Université Paris Cité
Hugues Duffau
Hugues Duffau University of Montpellier
Daniel S. Margulies
Daniel S. Margulies Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Stéphane Lehéricy
Stéphane Lehéricy Sorbonne University
Cédric Lemogne
Cédric Lemogne Université Paris Cité
Paolo Bartolomeo
Paolo Bartolomeo Allen Institute for Brain Science

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Emmanuelle Volle

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles