World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Maurizio Corbetta

Maurizio Corbetta

Award Badge
Neuroscience
Italy
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
110
Citations
99794
World Ranking
535
National Ranking
13

Maurizio Corbetta publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maurizio Corbetta sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 337 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Maurizio Corbetta D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maurizio Corbetta sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 110 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Neuroscience in Italy Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Neuroscience in Italy Leader Award

Overview

Maurizio Corbetta is affiliated with the University of Padua in Italy. Their research primarily spans the fields of neuroscience and medicine, with a focus on cognitive neuroscience, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, neurology, epidemiology, and molecular biology.

Their work covers several main topics including functional brain connectivity studies, advanced neuroimaging techniques and applications, neural dynamics and brain function, advanced MRI techniques and applications, EEG and brain-computer interfaces, acute ischemic stroke management, and stroke rehabilitation and recovery.

Corbetta has published extensively in various scientific venues. The most frequent publication outlets include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Brain Communications
  • Scientific Reports
  • Brain
  • NeuroImage Clinical

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Corbetta include:

  • Post-stroke deficit prediction from lesion and indirect structural and functional disconnection, 2020, Brain
  • Brain stimulation and brain lesions converge on common causal circuits in neuropsychiatric disease, 2021, Nature Human Behaviour
  • The secret life of predictive brains: what's spontaneous activity for?, 2021, Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  • Lesion Quantification Toolkit: A MATLAB software tool for estimating grey matter damage and white matter disconnections in patients with focal brain lesions, 2021, NeuroImage Clinical
  • Post-stroke outcomes predicted from multivariate lesion-behaviour and lesion network mapping, 2022, Brain

Frequently collaborating co-authors include:

  • Lorenzo Pini
  • Alessandra Bertoldo
  • Alessandro Salvalaggio
  • Erica Silvestri
  • Michel Thiebaut de Schotten

Best Publications

  • Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain

    Maurizio Corbetta;Gordon L. Shulman

  • The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks

    Michael D. Fox;Abraham Z. Snyder;Justin L. Vincent;Maurizio Corbetta

  • The Reorienting System of the Human Brain: From Environment to Theory of Mind

    Maurizio Corbetta;Gaurav Patel;Gordon L. Shulman

  • Dynamic functional connectivity: Promise, issues, and interpretations

    R. Matthew Hutchison;Thilo Womelsdorf;Elena A. Allen;Elena A. Allen;Peter A. Bandettini

  • The Human Connectome Project: A data acquisition perspective

    D. C. Van Essen;Kamil Ugurbil;Edward J Auerbach

  • Spontaneous neuronal activity distinguishes human dorsal and ventral attention systems

    Michael D. Fox;Maurizio Corbetta;Abraham Z. Snyder;Justin L. Vincent

  • Voluntary orienting is dissociated from target detection in human posterior parietal cortex

    Maurizio Corbetta;J. Michelle Kincade;John M. Ollinger;Marc P. McAvoy

  • Common blood flow changes across visual tasks: I. increases in subcortical structures and cerebellum but not in nonvisual cortex

    Gordon L. Shulman;Maurizio Corbetta;Randy L. Buckner;Julie A. Fiez

  • Electrophysiological signatures of resting state networks in the human brain.

    D. Mantini;M. G. Perrucci;C. Del Gratta;G. L. Romani

  • Selective and divided attention during visual discriminations of shape, color, and speed: functional anatomy by positron emission tomography

    M Corbetta;FM Miezin;S Dobmeyer;GL Shulman

  • A Common Network of Functional Areas for Attention and Eye Movements

    Maurizio Corbetta;Erbil Akbudak;Thomas E Conturo;Abraham Z Snyder

  • Intrinsic functional architecture in the anaesthetized monkey brain.

    J. L. Vincent;G. H. Patel;M. D. Fox;A. Z. Snyder

  • A PET study of visuospatial attention

    Maurizio Corbetta;Francis M. Miezin;Gordon L. Shulman;Steven E. Petersen

  • Common blood flow changes across visual tasks: Ii. decreases in cerebral cortex

    Gordon L. Shulman;Julie A. Fiez;Maurizio Corbetta;Randy L. Buckner

  • Function in the human connectome: Task-fMRI and individual differences in behavior

    M Deanna;Gregory C. Burgess;Michael P. Harms;Steven E. Petersen

  • Spatial neglect and attention networks

    Maurizio Corbetta;Gordon L. Shulman

  • Frontoparietal cortical networks for directing attention and the eye to visual locations: Identical, independent, or overlapping neural systems?

    Maurizio Corbetta

  • Attentional modulation of neural processing of shape, color, and velocity in humans

    Maurizio Corbetta;Francis M. Miezin;Susan Dobmeyer;Gordon L. Shulman

  • Large-scale cortical correlation structure of spontaneous oscillatory activity.

    Joerg F Hipp;David J Hawellek;Maurizio Corbetta;Markus Siegel

  • Breakdown of Functional Connectivity in Frontoparietal Networks Underlies Behavioral Deficits in Spatial Neglect

    Biyu J. He;Abraham Z. Snyder;Justin L. Vincent;Adrian Epstein

Frequent Co-Authors

Gordon L. Shulman
Gordon L. Shulman Washington University in St. Louis
Dante Mantini
Dante Mantini KU Leuven
Abraham Z. Snyder
Abraham Z. Snyder Washington University in St. Louis
Gian Luca Romani
Gian Luca Romani University of Chieti-Pescara
Steven E. Petersen
Steven E. Petersen Washington University in St. Louis
Marcus E. Raichle
Marcus E. Raichle Washington University in St. Louis
Gustavo Deco
Gustavo Deco Pompeu Fabra University
Michel Thiebaut de Schotten
Michel Thiebaut de Schotten University of Bordeaux
Francis M. Miezin
Francis M. Miezin Washington University in St. Louis
Lisa Tabor Connor
Lisa Tabor Connor Washington University in St. Louis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience in the USA opens the door to a wide range of online study options and career paths. Many students begin their journey by enrolling in online certification courses to build foundational knowledge in neuroscience, psychology, or healthcare. These short-term programs are practical for gaining industry-relevant skills quickly and often lead to positions that pay well.

For those seeking a more comprehensive education, there are numerous online degree programs that cover broad scientific topics, including neuroscience-related fields. These programs offer flexibility and may provide accelerated pathways for career transition or advancement.

Affordability is key when choosing an online degree. If your interests intersect with mental health or social work, you may consider enrolling in one of the cheapest cswe-accredited online msw programs. These degrees can complement neuroscience study for those interested in clinical, counseling, or advocacy roles.

Additionally, the demand for behavior analysts continues to grow. If you're interested in applied behavior analysis, you might explore bcba masters programs to further specialize your expertise. Such programs can lead directly to licensure and impactful careers in healthcare or education.

Best Scientists Citing Maurizio Corbetta

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles