World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Genetics 55 3562 3361 125 116 168 14301

Annelies de Klein publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Annelies de Klein between 1982 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Annelies de Klein published across 45 years, from 1982 to 2026, averaging 5 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2019. 4 of the 226 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1982 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2019. 1982: 1 publication 1983: 2 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 5 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 0 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 0 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 2 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 5 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 17 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 14 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 3 publications 2026: 1 publication
1982 2026

226 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Annelies de Klein: publications per year, 1982 to 2026
Year Publications
1982 1
1983 2
1984 2
1985 5
1986 3
1987 1
1988 0
1989 1
1990 0
1991 4
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 1
1996 1
1997 0
1998 4
1999 1
2000 1
2001 2
2002 2
2003 1
2004 5
2005 6
2006 4
2007 6
2008 10
2009 6
2010 14
2011 7
2012 14
2013 12
2014 10
2015 5
2016 10
2017 4
2018 10
2019 17
2020 13
2021 8
2022 14
2023 7
2024 8
2025 3
2026 1
Total 226
Download as CSV

Annelies de Klein publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Annelies de Klein sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 67 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 45–54 to 703+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 217. Most scientists, 217, have 125–134 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 165–174 publications, is where this scientist sits. 45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45–54 publications 703+

This scientist: 168 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
45–54 6
55–64 10
65–74 35
75–84 84
85–94 102
95–104 151
105–114 175
115–124 203
125–134 217
135–144 205
145–154 193
155–164 188
165–174 170 168
175–184 178
185–194 164
195–204 173
205–214 159
215–224 134
225–234 143
235–244 105
245–254 114
255–264 92
265–274 88
275–284 87
285–294 80
295–304 62
305–314 75
315–324 67
325–334 60
335–344 52
345–354 40
355–364 48
365–374 47
375–384 46
385–394 31
395–404 27
405–414 40
415–424 30
425–434 43
435–444 29
445–454 14
455–464 28
465–474 21
475–484 21
485–494 22
495–504 17
505–514 12
515–524 11
525–534 8
535–544 8
545–554 14
555–564 4
565–574 11
575–584 5
585–594 11
595–604 12
605–614 7
615–624 6
625–634 10
635–644 9
645–654 10
655–664 6
665–674 6
675–684 6
685–694 4
695–702 6
703+ 100
Download as CSV

Annelies de Klein D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Annelies de Klein sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 160+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 191. Most scientists, 191, have 62–63 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54–55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 24
42–43 52
44–45 84
46–47 112
48–49 118
50–51 141
52–53 143
54–55 145 55
56–57 179
58–59 162
60–61 175
62–63 191
64–65 172
66–67 184
68–69 164
70–71 158
72–73 150
74–75 136
76–77 127
78–79 127
80–81 111
82–83 110
84–85 110
86–87 84
88–89 102
90–91 66
92–93 72
94–95 70
96–97 54
98–99 60
100–101 49
102–103 55
104–105 45
106–107 42
108–109 28
110–111 39
112–113 25
114–115 31
116–117 29
118–119 34
120–121 29
122–123 29
124–125 18
126–127 27
128–129 22
130–131 16
132–133 11
134–135 17
136–137 12
138–139 21
140–141 4
142–143 9
144–145 14
146–147 6
148–149 10
150–151 7
152–153 9
154–155 8
156–157 8
158–159 9
160+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Annelies de Klein is affiliated with Erasmus University Rotterdam in the Netherlands. Their research spans multiple areas within medicine and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with a particular focus on ocular oncology and related fields.

Their main fields of study include Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Subfields in which they have published extensively include Molecular Biology, Ophthalmology, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, and Genetics.

The scientist's research covers several topics, prominently including:

  • Ocular Oncology and Treatments
  • Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studies
  • Renal and related cancers
  • Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Esophageal and GI Pathology
  • Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Cancers
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • Frontiers in Pediatrics
  • Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science

Among their recent publications are:

  • Multicenter External Validation of the Liverpool Uveal Melanoma Prognosticator Online: An OOG Collaborative Study (2020, Cancers)
  • Genetics of Ocular Melanoma: Insights into Genetics, Inheritance and Testing (2020, International Journal of Molecular Sciences)
  • Spliceosome Mutations in Uveal Melanoma (2020, International Journal of Molecular Sciences)
  • Molecular Genetics of Conjunctival Melanoma and Prognostic Value of TERT Promoter Mutation Analysis (2021, International Journal of Molecular Sciences)
  • Genome wide DNA methylation analysis of alveolar capillary dysplasia lung tissue reveals aberrant methylation of genes involved in development including the FOXF1 locus (2021, Clinical Epigenetics)

Collaborations have frequently involved colleagues such as Erwin Brosens, Emine Kılıç, Robert M. Verdijk, Nicole C. Naus, and Dion Paridaens. These coauthors have partnered with Annelies de Klein on multiple research projects, contributing to a body of work often centered on ocular and molecular biology topics.

Best Publications

  • Domain organization of human chromosomes revealed by mapping of nuclear lamina interactions

    Lars Guelen;Ludo Pagie;Emilie Brasset;Wouter Meuleman;Wouter Meuleman

  • A cellular oncogene is translocated to the Philadelphia chromosome in chronic myelocytic leukaemia

    Annelies de Klein;Ad Geurts van Kessel;Gerard Grosveld;Claus R. Bartram

  • Localization of the c- abl oncogene adjacent to a translocation break point in chronic myelocytic leukaemia

    Nora Heisterkamp;John R. Stephenson;John Groffen;Pamela F. Hansen

  • Translocation of c- abl oncogene correlates with the presence of a Philadelphia chromosome in chronic myelocytic leukaemia

    Claus R. Bartram;Annelies de Klein;Anne Hagemeijer;Ton van Agthoven

  • Early-onset parkinsonism associated with PINK1 mutations Frequency, genotypes, and phenotypes

    V. Bonifati;C. F. Rohé;G. J. Breedveld;E. Fabrizio

  • Evidence of a new chimeric bcr/c-abl mRNA in patients with chronic myelocytic leukemia and the Philadelphia chromosome.

    K Stam;N Heisterkamp;G Grosveld;A de Klein

  • Uveal Melanomas with SF3B1 Mutations: A Distinct Subclass Associated with Late-Onset Metastases

    Serdar Yavuzyigitoglu;Anna E. Koopmans;Robert M. Verdijk;Jolanda Vaarwater

  • The SH3 domain of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae peroxisomal membrane protein Pex13p functions as a docking site for Pex5p, a mobile receptor for the import PTS1-containing proteins.

    Y Elgersma;L Kwast;A Klein;T Voorn-Brouwer

  • Uveal melanoma: Towards a molecular understanding.

    Kyra N. Smit;Martine J. Jager;Annelies de Klein;Emine Kiliҫ

  • Clinical significance of immunohistochemistry for detection of BAP1 mutations in uveal melanoma

    Anna E Koopmans;Robert M Verdijk;Rutger W W Brouwer;Thierry P P van den Bosch

  • Clinical and Cytogenetic Analyses in Uveal Melanoma

    Emine Kilic;Walter van Gils;Elisabeth Lodder;H. Berna Beverloo

  • Concurrent Loss of Chromosome Arm 1p and Chromosome 3 Predicts a Decreased Disease-Free Survival in Uveal Melanoma Patients

    Emine Kilic;Nicole C Naus;Walter van Gils;Caroline C Klaver

  • Variegated gene expression caused by cell-specific long-range DNA interactions

    Daan Noordermeer;Elzo de Wit;Petra Klous;Harmen van de Werken

  • Whole-exome resequencing reveals recessive mutations in TRAP1 in individuals with CAKUT and VACTERL association

    Pawaree Saisawat;Stefan Kohl;Alina C. Hilger;Alina C. Hilger;Daw Yang Hwang

  • Small noncoding differentially methylated copy-number variants, including lncRNA genes, cause a lethal lung developmental disorder

    Przemyslaw Szafranski;Avinash V. Dharmadhikari;Erwin Brosens;Priyatansh Gurha;Priyatansh Gurha

  • Higher percentage of FISH-determined monosomy 3 and 8q amplification in uveal melanoma cells relate to poor patient prognosis.

    Thomas van den Bosch;Jackelien G M van Beek;Jolanda Vaarwater;Robert M Verdijk

  • Prognostic parameters in uveal melanoma and their association with BAP1 expression

    T Huibertus van Essen;Sake I van Pelt;Mieke Versluis;Inge H G Bronkhorst

  • Clinical geneticists' views of VACTERL/VATER association.

    Benjamin D. Solomon;Kelly A. Bear;Virginia Kimonis;Annelies de Klein

  • Translocation of c-abl to "masked" Ph in chronic myeloid leukemia.

    Anne Hagemeijer;Annelies de Klein;Elisabeth Gödde-Salz;Claude Turc-Carel

  • Detection of genetic prognostic markers in uveal melanoma biopsies using fluorescence in situ hybridization.

    Nicole C. Naus;Anette C. A. Verhoeven;Ellen van Drunen;Rosalyn Slater

Frequent Co-Authors

Dick Tibboel
Dick Tibboel Erasmus University Rotterdam
Gerard Grosveld
Gerard Grosveld St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
Daryl A. Scott
Daryl A. Scott Baylor College of Medicine
Brendan Lee
Brendan Lee Baylor College of Medicine
H. Berna Beverloo
H. Berna Beverloo Erasmus University Rotterdam
Robert M.W. Hofstra
Robert M.W. Hofstra Erasmus University Rotterdam
Ronald R. de Krijger
Ronald R. de Krijger Erasmus University Rotterdam
John R. Stephenson
John R. Stephenson National Institutes of Health
Claus R. Bartram
Claus R. Bartram Heidelberg University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring the field of genetics in the USA opens doors to diverse online degree options and career pathways in healthcare and biomedical science. For those interested in flexible nursing education, consider an rn to bsn with no clinical hours program, which enables registered nurses to advance their qualifications without the traditional in-person clinical requirement.

Healthcare professionals aiming for leadership roles might explore the 1 year msn to dnp program, offering a fast-track to a Doctor of Nursing Practice degree. Similarly, finding the dnp program that best suits your learning style and career goals can help maximize both educational efficiency and job prospects.

For those seeking to enter the healthcare workforce quickly, an accelerated ma program can provide essential medical assistant training in just weeks. These flexible online pathways often complement genetics studies, qualifying graduates for roles in research, clinical practice, and healthcare support—all key to advancing the medical sciences.

Best Scientists Citing Annelies de Klein

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles