World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
58
Citations
13438
World Ranking
3238
National Ranking
1252

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
58
Citations
13427
World Ranking
13082
National Ranking
5579

Peter Wilf publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Wilf sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 157 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Peter Wilf D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Wilf sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • Fellow of the Geological Society of America
  • Fellow of the Geological Society of America
  • Fellow of the Geological Society of America
  • Fellow of the Geological Society of America
  • Fellow of the Geological Society of America

Overview

Peter Wilf is affiliated with Pennsylvania State University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Earth and Planetary Sciences, with a focus on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Molecular Biology, Paleontology, Atmospheric Science, and Plant Science.

The scientist's work intersects several main topics, including Plant Diversity and Evolution, Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions, Plant and animal studies, Geology and Paleoclimatology Research, Evolution and Paleontology Studies, Geological and Geophysical Studies, and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies.

Peter Wilf has published extensively in a variety of scientific journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • American Journal of Botany
  • Abstracts with programs - Geological Society of America
  • Journal of Paleontology
  • New Phytologist
  • International Journal of Plant Sciences

The scholar has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, such as:

  • María A. Gandolfo
  • Ari Iglesias
  • Scott L. Wing
  • Michael P. Donovan
  • Gabriella Rossetto-Harris

Recent publications by Peter Wilf include:

  • The Angiosperm Terrestrial Revolution and the origins of modern biodiversity (2021) published in New Phytologist
  • Protect Australia's Gondwana Rainforests (2020) published in Science
  • Cretaceous-Paleogene plant extinction and recovery in Patagonia (2020) published in Paleobiology
  • Early Eocene Spore and Pollen Assemblages from the Laguna del Hunco Fossil Lake Beds, Patagonia, Argentina (2020) published in International Journal of Plant Sciences
  • An image dataset of cleared, x-rayed, and fossil leaves vetted to plant family for human and machine learning (2021) published in PhytoKeys

In recognition of their contributions to the scientific community, Peter Wilf has been named a Fellow of the Geological Society of America.

Best Publications

  • Global climatic drivers of leaf size.

    Ian J. Wright;Ning Dong;Ning Dong;Vincent Maire;Vincent Maire;I. Colin Prentice;I. Colin Prentice

  • Phylogenetic biome conservatism on a global scale

    Michael D. Crisp;Mary T. K. Arroyo;Lyn G. Cook;Maria A. Gandolfo

  • Manual of Leaf Architecture Morphological description and categorization of dicotyledonous and net-veined monocotyledonous angiosperms

    Amanda Ash;Beth Ellis;Leo J. Hickey;Kirk Johnson

  • When are leaves good thermometers? A new case for Leaf Margin Analysis

    Peter Wilf

  • Testing the Impact of Calibration on Molecular Divergence Times Using a Fossil-Rich Group: The Case of Nothofagus (Fagales)

    Hervé Sauquet;Simon Y. W. Ho;Simon Y. W. Ho;Maria A. Gandolfo;Gregory J. Jordan

  • USING FOSSIL LEAVES AS PALEOPRECIPITATION INDICATORS : AN EOCENE EXAMPLE

    Peter Wilf;Scott L. Wing;David R. Greenwood;Cathy L. Greenwood

  • Correlations of climate and plant ecology to leaf size and shape: Potential proxies for the fossil record

    Dana L. Royer;Peter Wilf;David A. Janesko;Elizabeth A. Kowalski

  • Late Paleocene–early Eocene climate changes in southwestern Wyoming: Paleobotanical analysis

    Peter Wilf

  • Impact of the terminal Cretaceous event on plant–insect associations

    Conrad C. Labandeira;Conrad C. Labandeira;Kirk R. Johnson;Peter Wilf

  • High Plant Diversity in Eocene South America: Evidence from Patagonia

    Peter Wilf;Peter Wilf;Peter Wilf;N. Rubén Cúneo;Kirk R. Johnson;Jason F. Hicks

  • Correlated terrestrial and marine evidence for global climate changes before mass extinction at the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary.

    Peter Wilf;Kirk R. Johnson;Brian T. Huber

  • Sharply increased insect herbivory during the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum.

    Ellen D. Currano;Ellen D. Currano;Peter Wilf;Scott L. Wing;Conrad C. Labandeira;Conrad C. Labandeira

  • Late Paleocene fossils from the Cerrejón Formation, Colombia, are the earliest record of Neotropical rainforest

    Scott L. Wing;Fabiany Herrera;Fabiany Herrera;Carlos A. Jaramillo;Carolina Gómez-Navarro;Carolina Gómez-Navarro

  • The Angiosperm Terrestrial Revolution and the origins of modern biodiversity

    Michael J Benton;Peter Wilf;Hervé Sauquet;Hervé Sauquet

  • Eocene Plant Diversity at Laguna del Hunco and Río Pichileufú, Patagonia, Argentina

    Peter Wilf;Kirk R. Johnson;N. Rubén Cúneo;M. Elliot Smith

  • Response of Plant-Insect Associations to Paleocene-Eocene Warming

    Peter Wilf;Conrad C. Labandeira;Conrad C. Labandeira

  • WHY DO TOOTHED LEAVES CORRELATE WITH COLD CLIMATES? GAS EXCHANGE AT LEAF MARGINS PROVIDES NEW INSIGHTS INTO A CLASSIC PALEOTEMPERATURE PROXY

    Dana L. Royer;Dana L. Royer;Peter Wilf

  • Timing the radiations of leaf beetles: hispines on gingers from latest cretaceous to recent.

    Peter Wilf;Conrad C. Labandeira;W. John Kress;Charles L. Staines

  • Decoupled Plant and Insect Diversity After the End-Cretaceous Extinction

    Peter Wilf;Conrad C. Labandeira;Conrad C. Labandeira;Kirk R. Johnson;Beth Ellis

  • Sensitivity of leaf size and shape to climate within Acer rubrum and Quercus kelloggii

    Dana L. Royer;Jennifer C. McElwain;Jonathan M. Adams;Peter Wilf

Frequent Co-Authors

Conrad C. Labandeira
Conrad C. Labandeira Smithsonian Institution
Maria A. Gandolfo
Maria A. Gandolfo Cornell University
Kirk R. Johnson
Kirk R. Johnson National Museum of Natural History
Robert M. Kooyman
Robert M. Kooyman Macquarie University
Scott L. Wing
Scott L. Wing National Museum of Natural History
Dana L. Royer
Dana L. Royer Wesleyan University
Mark Westoby
Mark Westoby Macquarie University
Ian J. Wright
Ian J. Wright Western Sydney University
Lawren Sack
Lawren Sack University of California, Los Angeles
Ülo Niinemets
Ülo Niinemets Estonian University of Life Sciences

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career pathways. A public administration focus, for example, can enhance skills in environmental policy and governance. Professionals might consider enrolling in one year MPA programs, which offer a fast-track option to develop leadership capabilities in managing environmental projects and regulations.

Understanding human behavior and societies is also crucial for addressing environmental challenges. Earning a best online bachelor degree in sociology can provide insights into community dynamics and social factors tied to sustainability efforts, making graduates valuable in advocacy and research roles.

For educators looking to specialize in environmental education or integrate sustainability into curriculum, advanced degrees such as education doctoral programs without dissertation requirements offer a flexible route to deepen expertise. These programs allow scholars to focus on applied research and practical solutions without the extended dissertation process.

Furthermore, transitioning from an EdS to EdD program is a popular pathway for education professionals aiming to influence environmental policies at institutional or governmental levels. This progression supports advanced leadership skills and fosters innovation in environmental education strategies.

Exploring these related online degrees can complement an environmental sciences background, broadening both knowledge and career opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Wilf

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles