World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Gregory J. Jordan

Gregory J. Jordan

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
61
Citations
15710
World Ranking
2163
National Ranking
169

Gregory J. Jordan publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gregory J. Jordan sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 235 publications — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Gregory J. Jordan D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gregory J. Jordan sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gregory J. Jordan is affiliated with the University of Tasmania in Australia. Their research primarily spans the fields of Environmental Science and Agricultural and Biological Sciences, with notable focus on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Molecular Biology, and Plant Science.

The scientist's work addresses key topics such as Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies, Plant Diversity and Evolution, Species Distribution and Climate Change, Plant and animal studies, Remote Sensing in Agriculture, Evolution and Paleontology Studies, and Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications.

Recent publications by Gregory J. Jordan include the following:

  • AusTraits, a curated plant trait database for the Australian flora, 2021, Scientific Data
  • Accuracy of ancestral state reconstruction for non-neutral traits, 2020, Scientific Reports
  • AusTraits - a curated plant trait database for the Australian flora, 2021, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • A Permeable Cuticle, Not Open Stomata, Is the Primary Source of Water Loss From Expanding Leaves, 2020, Frontiers in Plant Science
  • Diversity and abundance of soil microbial communities decline, and community compositions change with severity of post-logging fire, 2021, Molecular Ecology

Frequent co-authors in their research include Susan C. Baker, Timothy J. Brodribb, Ian J. Wright, Raymond J. Carpenter, and Bechu K. V. Yadav.

Publication venues where Gregory J. Jordan has contributed multiple papers include Scientific Data, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Forest Ecology and Management, Global Ecology and Biogeography, and New Phytologist.

Best Publications

  • TRY plant trait database : Enhanced coverage and open access

    Jens Kattge;Gerhard Bönisch;Sandra Díaz;Sandra Lavorel

  • Leaf Maximum Photosynthetic Rate and Venation Are Linked by Hydraulics

    Tim J. Brodribb;Taylor S. Feild;Gregory J. Jordan

  • Phylogenetic biome conservatism on a global scale

    Michael D. Crisp;Mary T. K. Arroyo;Lyn G. Cook;Maria A. Gandolfo

  • Sensitivity of leaf size and shape to climate: Global patterns and paleoclimatic applications

    Daniel J. Peppe;Daniel J. Peppe;Dana L. Royer;Bárbara Cariglino;Sofia Y. Oliver

  • Testing the Impact of Calibration on Molecular Divergence Times Using a Fossil-Rich Group: The Case of Nothofagus (Fagales)

    Hervé Sauquet;Simon Y. W. Ho;Simon Y. W. Ho;Maria A. Gandolfo;Gregory J. Jordan

  • Decline of a biome: Evolution, contraction, fragmentation, extinction and invasion of the Australian mesic zone biota

    Margaret Byrne;Dorothy Steane;Leo Joseph;David K. Yeates

  • Leaf hydraulic vulnerability is related to conduit dimensions and drought resistance across a diverse range of woody angiosperms.

    Christopher J. Blackman;Tim J. Brodribb;Gregory J. Jordan

  • Conifer species adapt to low-rainfall climates by following one of two divergent pathways

    Timothy J. Brodribb;Scott A.M. McAdam;Gregory J. Jordan;Samuel C.V. Martins

  • Evolution of stomatal responsiveness to CO2 and optimization of water‐use efficiency among land plants

    Timothy J. Brodribb;Scott A. M. McAdam;Gregory J. Jordan;Taylor S. Feild

  • Leaf hydraulics and drought stress: response, recovery and survivorship in four woody temperate plant species

    Christopher J. Blackman;Timothy J. Brodribb;Gregory J. Jordan

  • Acclimation to humidity modifies the link between leaf size and the density of veins and stomata

    Madeline R. Carins Murphy;Gregory J. Jordan;Timothy J. Brodribb

  • Water supply and demand remain balanced during leaf acclimation of Nothofagus cunninghamii trees

    Timothy J. Brodribb;Gregory J. Jordan

  • Unified changes in cell size permit coordinated leaf evolution.

    Tim J. Brodribb;Greg J. Jordan;Raymond J. Carpenter

  • Differential leaf expansion can enable hydraulic acclimation to sun and shade

    Madeline R. Carins Murphy;Gregory J. Jordan;Timothy J. Brodribb

  • AusTraits, a curated plant trait database for the Australian flora.

    Daniel Falster;Rachael Gallagher;Rachael Gallagher;Elizabeth H. Wenk;Ian J. Wright

  • The evolutionary history of Nothofagus (Nothofagaceae)

    RS Hill;GJ Jordan

  • A geographic mosaic of genetic variation within a foundation tree species and its community-level consequences.

    Robert C. Barbour;Julianne M. O'Reilly-Wapstra;David W. De Little;Gregory J. Jordan

  • Fossil leaf economics quantified: calibration, Eocene case study, and implications

    Dana L. Royer;Lawren Sack;Peter Wilf;Christopher H. Lusk

  • A practical guide to DNA metabarcoding for entomological ecologists

    Mingxin Liu;Laurence J. Clarke;Susan C. Baker;Gregory J. Jordan

  • Strong, independent, quantitative genetic control of the timing of vegetative phase change and first flowering in eucalyptus globulus ssp. globulus (Tasmanian blue gum)

    Gregory J Jordan;Bradley M Potts;Robert J E Wiltshire

  • Glacial refugia and reticulate evolution: the case of the Tasmanian eucalypts

    Gregory J. Jordan;René E. Vaillancourt;Dorothy A. Steane

  • Solar radiation as a factor in the evolution of scleromorphic leaf anatomy in Proteaceae

    Gregory J. Jordan;Rebecca A. Dillon;Peter H. Weston

  • Internal coordination between hydraulics and stomatal control in leaves

    Tim J. Brodribb;Gregory J. Jordan

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert S. Hill
Robert S. Hill University of Adelaide
Timothy J. Brodribb
Timothy J. Brodribb University of Tasmania
Tim Wardlaw
Tim Wardlaw Forestry Tasmania
Brad M. Potts
Brad M. Potts University of Tasmania
René E. Vaillancourt
René E. Vaillancourt University of Tasmania
David M. J. S. Bowman
David M. J. S. Bowman University of Tasmania
Grant J. Williamson
Grant J. Williamson University of Tasmania
Dorothy A. Steane
Dorothy A. Steane University of Tasmania
Scott A. M. McAdam
Scott A. M. McAdam Purdue University West Lafayette
Ülo Niinemets
Ülo Niinemets Estonian University of Life Sciences

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Online degrees in Ecology and Evolution are increasingly accessible, offering flexibility for working professionals and students balancing multiple commitments. With a variety of programs available, choosing the right school is crucial. When comparing institutions, users often ask which school is better snhu vs wgu, highlighting the importance of accreditation, student support, and career outcomes.

For those seeking to advance their expertise, bridge programs are a popular pathway. Degrees such as bsn to msn online programs demonstrate the trend toward streamlined, affordable options that help students move from undergraduate to graduate studies in less time.

Institutional type is another key consideration. Many students prefer to attend non profit online colleges, which often focus on student success rather than profit margins.

Military-connected students have specialized needs. Thankfully, there are military friendly colleges online that offer resources, financial aid, and flexibility tailored to veterans and active-duty members. These options make it possible for a wider range of students to build successful careers in Ecology, Evolution, and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Gregory J. Jordan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles